The clinical presentation, treatment, and outcome of patients diagnosed with possible ectopic molar gestation

被引:51
作者
Gillespie, AM
Lidbury, EA
Tidy, JA
Hancock, BW
机构
[1] Royal Hallamshire Hosp, Dept Gynaecol Oncol, Sheffield S10 2JF, S Yorkshire, England
[2] Weston Pk Hosp, Trophoblast Dis Screening & Treatment Ctr, Sheffield, S Yorkshire, England
关键词
ectopic; molar and gestational trophoblastic disease;
D O I
10.1111/j.1048-891X.2004.014223.x
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The objective of this study was to determine the clinical presentation, treatment, and outcome of patients diagnosed with possible ectopic molar gestation registered with the Trophoblastic Disease Screening and Treatment Centre, Weston Park Hospital, Sheffield between 1986 and 2000. From the 5581 women registered, those with a diagnosis of ectopic molar pregnancy were identified from a computer database. Information regarding the relevant history of each patient and the clinical presentation, treatment, and outcomes of gestational trophoblastic disease (GTD) was determined by reviewing referral forms, case notes, and pro formas completed by the referring gynecologist. Histological review of the cases was undertaken where possible. Suspected ectopic molar gestations comprised 31/5581 (0.55%) of registrations. Known risk factors for ectopic pregnancy were identified in 79% of cases. Central histological review confirmed only six cases of GTD: three choriocarcinoma and three early complete moles. Four patients subsequently required chemotherapy. All patients are now in complete remission. We conclude that ectopic GTD is uncommon, with a UK incidence of approximately 1.5 per 1,000,000 births. Initial management is usually surgical removal of the conceptus, pathological suspicion of the diagnosis and registration with a screening center. Chemotherapy may be required and the prognosis is excellent.
引用
收藏
页码:366 / 369
页数:4
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   Risk factors for ectopic pregnancy: A meta-analysis [J].
Ankum, WM ;
Mol, BWJ ;
VanderVeen, F ;
Bossuyt, PMM .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 1996, 65 (06) :1093-1099
[2]  
BAGSHAWE KD, 1986, LANCET, V2, P673
[3]   PROSPECTIVE COMPARISON OF VIDEOPELVISCOPY WITH LAPAROTOMY FOR ECTOPIC PREGNANCY [J].
BAUMANN, R ;
MAGOS, AL ;
TURNBULL, A .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1991, 98 (08) :765-771
[4]   Over-diagnosis of hydatidiform mole in early tubal ectopic pregnancy [J].
Burton, JL ;
Lidbury, EA ;
Gillespie, AM ;
Tidy, JA ;
Smith, O ;
Lawry, J ;
Hancock, BW ;
Wells, M .
HISTOPATHOLOGY, 2001, 38 (05) :409-417
[5]  
CHUA RN, 1988, INDIANA MED, V10, P26
[6]  
*DEP HLTH WELSH OF, 1998, REP CONF ENQ MAT DEA
[7]  
Fisher PM, 1997, CANC TREAT REV, V32, P1
[8]  
Garry R., 1996, GYNAECOL ENDOSC, V5, P65
[9]  
GRAY DT, 1995, LANCET, V345, P1139, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(95)90977-X
[10]  
LING FW, 1994, ADV OBSTET GYNAECOLO, V1, P55