Estimating the Mass of the Milky Way Using the Ensemble of Classical Satellite Galaxies

被引:45
作者
Patel, Ekta [1 ]
Besla, Gurtina [1 ]
Mandel, Kaisey [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Sohn, Sangmo Tony [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Arizona, Dept Astron, 933 North Cherry Ave, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA
[2] Inst Astron, Madingley Rd, Cambridge CB3 0HA, England
[3] Kavli Inst Cosmol, Madingley Rd, Cambridge CB3 0HA, England
[4] Univ Cambridge, Stat Lab, DPMMS, Wilberforce Rd, Cambridge CB3 0WB, England
[5] Space Telescope Sci Inst, 3700 San Martin Dr, Baltimore, MD 21218 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
galaxies: evolution; galaxies: fundamental parameters; galaxies: kinematics and dynamics; Local Group; DWARF SPHEROIDAL GALAXIES; LARGE-MAGELLANIC-CLOUD; PROPER MOTIONS; ILLUSTRIS SIMULATION; LOCAL GROUP; MATTER; DARK; SUBHALOES; PROJECT; ORBITS;
D O I
10.3847/1538-4357/aab78f
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
High precision proper motion (PM) measurements are available for approximately 20% of all known dwarf satellite galaxies of the Milky Way (MW). Here we extend the Bayesian framework of Patel et al. to include all MW satellites with measured 6D phase-space information and apply it with the Illustris-Dark simulation to constrain the MW's mass. Using the properties of each MW satellite individually, we find that the scatter among mass estimates is reduced when the magnitude of specific orbital angular momentum (j) is adopted, rather than their combined instantaneous positions and velocities. We also find that high j satellites (i.e., Leo II) constrain the upper limits for the MW's mass and low j satellites, rather than the highest speed satellites (i.e., Leo I and Large Magellanic Cloud), set the lower mass limits. When j of all classical satellites is used to simultaneously estimate the MW's mass, we conclude the halo mass is 0.85(-0.26)(+0.23) x 10(12) M-circle dot (including Sagittarius dSph) and 0.96(-0.28)(+0.29) x 10(12) M-circle dot. (excluding Sagittarius dSph), cautioning that low j satellites on decaying orbits like Sagittarius dSph may bias the distribution. These estimates markedly reduce the current factor of two spread in the mass range of the MW. We also find a well-defined relationship between host halo mass and satellite j distribution, which yields the prediction that upcoming PMs for ultra-faint dwarfs should reveal j within 5 x 10(3)-10(4) kpc km s(-1). This is a promising method to significantly constrain the cosmologically expected mass range for the MW and eventually M31 as more satellite PMs become available.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The Planar Satellite Distributions around Andromeda, the Milky Way and Other Galaxies, and Their Implications for Fundamental Physics
    Kroupa, P.
    MULTI-SPIN GALAXIES, 2014, 486 : 183 - 202
  • [42] Properties of simulated Milky Way-mass galaxies in loose group and field environments
    Few, C. G.
    Gibson, B. K.
    Courty, S.
    Michel-Dansac, L.
    Brook, C. B.
    Stinson, G. S.
    ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS, 2012, 547
  • [43] Nearest Neighbor: The Low-mass Milky Way Satellite Tucana III
    Simon, J. D.
    Li, T. S.
    Drlica-Wagner, A.
    Bechtol, K.
    Marshall, J. L.
    James, D. J.
    Wang, M. Y.
    Strigari, L.
    Balbinot, E.
    Kuehn, K.
    Walker, A. R.
    Abbott, T. M. C.
    Allam, S.
    Annis, J.
    Benoit-Levy, A.
    Brooks, D.
    Buckley-Geer, E.
    Burke, D. L.
    Carnero Rosell, A.
    Kind, M. Carrasco
    Carretero, J.
    Cunha, C. E.
    D'Andrea, C. B.
    da Costa, L. N.
    DePoy, D. L.
    Desai, S.
    Doel, P.
    Fernandez, E.
    Flaugher, B.
    Frieman, J.
    Garcia-Bellido, J.
    Gaztanaga, E.
    Goldstein, D. A.
    Gruen, D.
    Gutierrez, G.
    Kuropatkin, N.
    Maia, M. A. G.
    Martini, P.
    Menanteau, F.
    Miller, C. J.
    Miquel, R.
    Neilsen, E.
    Nord, B.
    Ogando, R.
    Plazas, A. A.
    Romer, A. K.
    Rykoff, E. S.
    Sanchez, E.
    Santiago, B.
    Scarpine, V.
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2017, 838 (01)
  • [44] The formation times and building blocks of Milky Way-mass galaxies in the FIRE simulations
    Santistevan, Isaiah B.
    Wetzel, Andrew
    El-Badry, Kareem
    Bland-Hawthorn, Joss
    Boylan-Kolchin, Michael
    Bailin, Jeremy
    Faucher-Giguere, Claude-Andre
    Benincasa, Samantha
    MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2020, 497 (01) : 747 - 764
  • [45] Search for 511 keV emission in satellite galaxies of the Milky Way with INTEGRAL/SPI
    Siegert, Thomas
    Diehl, Roland
    Vincent, Aaron C.
    Guglielmetti, Fabrizia
    Krause, Martin G. H.
    Boehm, Celine
    ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS, 2016, 595
  • [46] THE MASS OF THE MILKY WAY AND M31 USING THE METHOD OF LEAST ACTION
    Phelps, Steven
    Nusser, Adi
    Desjacques, Vincent
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2013, 775 (02)
  • [47] How common is the Milky Way-satellite system alignment?
    Libeskind, Noam I.
    Frenk, Carlos S.
    Cole, Shaun
    Jenkins, Adrian
    Helly, John C.
    MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2009, 399 (02) : 550 - 558
  • [48] Estimating the Milky Way's Mass via Hierarchical Bayes: A Blind Test on MUGS2 Simulated Galaxies
    Eadie, Gwendolyn
    Keller, Benjamin
    Harris, William E.
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2018, 865 (01)
  • [49] Tidal tails of dwarf galaxies on different orbits around the Milky Way
    Lokas, Ewa L.
    Gajda, Grzegorz
    Kazantzidis, Stelios
    MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2013, 433 (01) : 878 - 888
  • [50] THE COSMIC ABUNDANCE OF CLASSICAL MILKY WAY SATELLITES
    Strigari, Louis E.
    Wechsler, Risa H.
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2012, 749 (01)