Initial evaluation of the Consent Support Tool: A structured procedure to facilitate the inclusion and engagement of people with aphasia in the informed consent process

被引:32
作者
Jayes, Mark [1 ]
Palmer, Rebecca [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Sheffield Teaching Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Sheffield, S Yorkshire, England
[2] Univ Sheffield, Sheffield, S Yorkshire, England
关键词
Aphasia; stroke; case series; EDUCATION MATERIALS; DECISION-MAKING; INFORMATION; PRINCIPLES; AGREEMENT; ISSUES; STROKE;
D O I
10.3109/17549507.2013.795999
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
This study evaluated the Consent Support Tool (CST), a procedure developed to identify the optimum format in which to present research information to people with different severities of aphasia, in order to support their understanding during the informed consent process. Participants were a convenience sample of 13 people with aphasia who had mixed comprehension ability. The CST was used to profile each participant's language ability and identify an information format that should maximize her/his understanding. Next, participants were shown information presented in three formats: standard text and two "aphasia-friendly" versions providing different levels of support. Participants' understanding of the information was measured for each format. The format recommended by the CST was compared with the format observed to maximize understanding for each participant. The CST accurately predicted the optimum format for 11/13 participants and differentiated people who could understand fully with support from those who could not in 12/13 cases. All participants interviewed (10/10) found the adapted formats helpful and 9/10 preferred them to the standard version. These findings suggest that the CST could usefully support researchers to determine whether a person with aphasia is likely to be able to provide informed consent, and which information format will maximize that individual's understanding. The CST and different information formats are available as Supplementary Appendices to be found online at http://www.informahealthcare.com/doi/abs/10.3109/17549507.2013.795999.
引用
收藏
页码:159 / 168
页数:10
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
Bland M., 2008, MEASURING HLTH DIS C
[2]  
Braunack-Mayer A, 2001, J CLIN ETHIC, V12, P388
[3]   The rellationship between specific features of aphasia-friendly written material and comprehension of written material for people with aphasia: An exploratory study [J].
Brennan, AD ;
Worrall, LE ;
McKenna, KT .
APHASIOLOGY, 2005, 19 (08) :693-711
[4]  
Carling-Rowland A., 2010, Med Law Int, V10, P171, DOI [10.1177/096853321001000301, DOI 10.1177/096853321001000301]
[5]   Methodological issues in interviews involving people with communication impairments after acquired brain damage [J].
Carlsson, Eva ;
Paterson, Barbara L. ;
Scott-Findlay, Shannon ;
Ehnfors, Margareta ;
Ehrenberg, Anna .
QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH, 2007, 17 (10) :1361-1371
[6]   A COEFFICIENT OF AGREEMENT FOR NOMINAL SCALES [J].
COHEN, J .
EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1960, 20 (01) :37-46
[7]  
Connect, 2007, INCL PEOPL COMM DIS
[8]   Facilitating the participation of people with aphasia in research: a description of strategies [J].
Dalemans, Ruth ;
Wade, Derick T. ;
van den Heuvel, Wim J. A. ;
de Witte, Luc P. .
CLINICAL REHABILITATION, 2009, 23 (10) :948-959
[9]  
Eames Sally, 2003, Top Stroke Rehabil, V10, P70
[10]   Legal decision-making by people with aphasia: critical incidents for speech pathologists [J].
Ferguson, Alison ;
Duffield, Gemma ;
Worrall, Linda .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LANGUAGE & COMMUNICATION DISORDERS, 2010, 45 (02) :244-258