Rising cesarean rates: Are patients sicker?

被引:62
作者
Bailit, JL [1 ]
Love, TE
Mercer, B
机构
[1] Case Western Reserve Univ, Div Maternal Fetal Med, Metrohlth Med Ctr, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[2] Case Western Reserve Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Metrohlth Med Ctr, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[3] Case Western Reserve Univ, Dept Med, Metrohlth Med Ctr, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[4] Case Western Reserve Univ, Dept Operat, Metrohlth Med Ctr, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[5] Case Western Reserve Univ, Ctr Hlth Care Res & Policy, Metrohlth Med Ctr, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
关键词
cesarean delivery; risk adjustment; quality of care;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajog.2004.01.051
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: Our study explored if patient risk factors for cesarean delivery (CD) are changing over time. Study design: North Carolina birth certificates from 1995 were used to build a logistic regression model to predict the probability of primary CD. The model estimated each patient's probability of primary CD for 4 years of deliveries (397,793). The percentage of the population in each of the 10 CD risk deciles were compared across years. Results: The incidence of primary CD rose from 16.6 to 18.4 (P<.0001). Despite this increase over time, more women were low risk (probability of CD <10%) (43.2% to 46.4%, P<.0001). The cesarean rate even rose for women in the lowest risk group (4.6% to 5.9%, P<.0001). Conclusion: The rate of primary CD is increasing, despite improvements in patient risk profile. The increasing CD rate may result from changes in physician behavior, institutional factors, and increasing patient demand for elective cesarean delivery. (C) 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:800 / 803
页数:4
相关论文
共 17 条
  • [1] *AM COLL OBST GYNE, 2000, SCHED CES DEL PREV V
  • [2] TRENDS IN AN OBSTETRIC PATIENT POPULATION - AN 18-YEAR STUDY
    AMINI, SB
    DIERKER, LJ
    CATALANO, PM
    ASHMEAD, GG
    MANN, LI
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1994, 171 (04) : 1014 - 1021
  • [3] Impact of risk-adjusting cesarean delivery rates when reporting hospital performance
    Aron, DC
    Harper, DL
    Shepardson, LB
    Rosenthal, GE
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1998, 279 (24): : 1968 - 1972
  • [4] Comparison of risk-adjustment methodologies for cesarean delivery rates
    Bailit, J
    Garrett, J
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2003, 102 (01) : 45 - 51
  • [5] Hospital primary cesarean delivery rates and the risk of poor neonatal outcomes
    Bailit, JL
    Garrett, JM
    Miller, WC
    McMahon, MJ
    Cefalo, RC
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2002, 187 (03) : 721 - 727
  • [6] Risk adjustment for interhospital comparison of primary cesarean rates
    Bailit, JL
    Dooley, SL
    Peaceman, AN
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1999, 93 (06) : 1025 - 1030
  • [7] Cesarean delivery risk adjustment for regional interhospital comparisons
    Glantz, JC
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1999, 181 (06) : 1425 - 1431
  • [8] Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial
    Hannah, ME
    Hannah, WJ
    Hewson, SA
    Hodnett, ED
    Saigal, S
    Willan, AR
    [J]. LANCET, 2000, 356 (9239) : 1375 - 1383
  • [9] Hosmer W., 2000, Applied Logistic Regression, VSecond
  • [10] IEZZONI L, 1997, RISK ADJUSTMENT MEAS, P609