Patient treatment preferences for osteoporosis

被引:53
作者
Fraenkel, Liana
Gulanski, Barbara
Wittink, Dick
机构
[1] Yale Univ, Sch Med, Rheumatol Sect, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
[2] VA Connecticut Healthcare Syst, West Haven, CT USA
来源
ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATISM-ARTHRITIS CARE & RESEARCH | 2006年 / 55卷 / 05期
关键词
osteoporosis; bisphosphonates; recombinant human parathyroid hormone; decision making;
D O I
10.1002/art.22229
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective. To examine patient preferences for currently available and promising osteoporosis treatment options. Methods. We recruited patients who had recently (within 2 weeks) undergone bone densitometry and were found to have osteoporosis. Consenting participants completed an Adaptive Conjoint Analysis questionnaire to determine their treatment preferences for oral bisphosphonates taken once per week, intravenous bisphosphonates administered every 3 months, intravenous bisphosphonates administered once per year, and subcutaneous recombinant human parathyroid hormone (rhPTH). We performed simulations based on respondents' values for route of administration, absolute reduction in risk of vertebral and hip fractures over 5 years, and risk of adverse effects to predict each respondent's treatment choice. Results. The study sample included 201 women and 11 men (median age 73). Patients' treatment preferences were strongly influenced by route of administration. Patients' preferred treatment option, across all simulations, was bisphosphonates. Among 80 treatment-naive participants, 52 (65%) preferred an annual infusion over oral weekly bisphosphonates. Participants with poorer perceived health status, those with a high perceived risk of future fracture, and participants preferring to treat health problems without doctors or prescription drugs were more likely to prefer an annual infusion over weekly pills. Conclusion. Patient preferences for osteoporosis treatment options are strongly influenced by route of administration. Therefore, despite the added benefits of rhPTH, patients' preferred treatment option for osteoporosis is bisphosphonates. Among those preferring bisphosphonates, many preferred annual infusions over weekly oral medications, emphasizing the need to incorporate individual patient preferences into treatment decisions for osteoporosis. The latter is especially important given the poor rates of long-term adherence to osteoporosis medications.
引用
收藏
页码:729 / 735
页数:7
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1993, SF-36 Health Status Survey Manual
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1997, AM J MED
  • [3] BLACK D, 2002, INT S REC CLIN ADV O
  • [4] An assessment tool for predicting fracture risk in postmenopausal women
    Black, DM
    Steinbuch, M
    Palermo, L
    Dargent-Molina, P
    Lindsay, R
    Hoseyni, MS
    Johnell, O
    [J]. OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2001, 12 (07) : 519 - 528
  • [5] Randomised trial of effect of alendronate on risk of fracture in women with existing vertebral fractures
    Black, DM
    Cummings, SR
    Karpf, DB
    Cauley, JA
    Thompson, DE
    Nevitt, MC
    Bauer, DC
    Genant, HK
    Haskell, WL
    Marcus, R
    Ott, SM
    Torner, JC
    Quandt, SA
    Reiss, TF
    Ensrud, KE
    [J]. LANCET, 1996, 348 (9041) : 1535 - 1541
  • [6] A Randomized double-blind trial to compare the efficacy of teriparatide [recombinant human parathyroid hormone (1-34)] with alendronate in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis
    Body, JJ
    Gaich, GA
    Scheele, WH
    Kulkarni, PM
    Miller, PD
    Peretz, A
    Dore, RK
    Correa-Rotter, R
    Papaioannou, A
    Cumming, DC
    Hodsman, AB
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM, 2002, 87 (10) : 4528 - 4535
  • [7] Informed decision making in outpatient practice - Time to get back to basics
    Braddock, CH
    Edwards, KA
    Hasenberg, NM
    Laidley, TL
    Levinson, W
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1999, 282 (24): : 2313 - 2320
  • [8] Effect of alendronate on risk of fracture in women with low bone density but without vertebral fractures - Results from the fracture intervention trial
    Cummings, SR
    Black, DM
    Thompson, DE
    Applegate, WB
    Barrett-Connor, E
    Musliner, TA
    Palermo, L
    Prineas, R
    Rubin, SM
    Scott, JC
    Vogt, T
    Wallace, R
    Yates, AJ
    LaCroix, AZ
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1998, 280 (24): : 2077 - 2082
  • [9] DOCTOR-PATIENT COMMUNICATION IN RHEUMATOLOGICAL DISORDERS
    DALTROY, LH
    [J]. BAILLIERES CLINICAL RHEUMATOLOGY, 1993, 7 (02): : 221 - 239
  • [10] Edworthy SM, 1999, J RHEUMATOL, V26, P1793