Jurisprudence of the European court of human rights in the choice of precautionary measures in criminal proceedings: legal realities and perspectives

被引：0

作者：

Romantsova, Svitlana ^{[1
]}

Zinkovskyy, Igor ^{[2
]}

Komisarchuk, Ruslan ^{[3
]}

Balatska, Olha ^{[4
]}

Strelbitska, Lesia ^{[5
]}

机构：

[1] Lviv State Univ Internal Affairs, Fac Law, Dept Criminal Law, Lvov, Ukraine

[2] Natl Univ, Odesa Law Acad, Dept Criminal Procedure Detect & Operat Search Ac, Odesa, Ukraine

[3] Natl Univ, Odesa Law Acad, Criminol Dept, Odesa, Ukraine

[4] Natl Univ, Ostroh Acad, I Malynovskyi Inst Law, Dept Civil Legal Disciplines, Ostroh, Ukraine

[5] Natl Univ, Ostroh Acad, Dept State Legal Disciplines, Ostroh, Ukraine

来源：

CUESTIONES POLITICAS | 2020年 / 38卷 / 67期

关键词：

European Court of Human Rights; European jurisprudence; precautionary measures; criminal process; legal reality of Ukraine;

D O I：

10.46398/cuestpol.382e.34

中图分类号：

D0 [政治学、政治理论];

学科分类号：

0302 ; 030201 ;

摘要：

The article deals with the problems of application of the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) in the selection of precautionary measures in criminal cases in accordance with Ukrainian law. Since the procedural legislation of Ukraine is currently not perfect in the framework of the establishment and regulation of the application of precautionary measures, the decisions of the ECHR serve as an indispensable regulator of this issue. The objective of the work is to study the peculiarities of the application of the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights in the selection of precautionary measures in criminal proceedings. The subject of the investigation is the jurisprudence of the ECHR in the context of the choice of precautionary measures in the criminal process. The research methodology included and combined the dialectical method, logical and legal method, analysis, synthesis. By way of conclusion, the study shows that the practice of the ECHR is mandatory to take into account not only the courts but also the investigators and prosecutors, who legally have the right to request the court to apply such precautionary measures.

引用

页码：443 / 458

页数：16

共 50 条

[31] The Protection of the Right to Life at the Intersection between Reproductive Rights and Scientific Progress in the Jurisprudence of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights and the European Court of Human Rights
Fanni, Simona
ARAUCARIA-REVISTA IBEROAMERICANA DE FILOSOFIA POLITICA Y HUMANIDADES, 2018, 20 (40): : 655 - 732
[32] PRECONDITIONS FOR ACCESS TO COURT - LEGAL VIEWS AND CASE-LAW OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
Sarin, Duska
PRAVNI VJESNIK, 2016, 32 (01): : 95 - 120
[33] The Turkish Constitutional Court's struggle with the European human rights law: an evaluation of the court's case-law on the crime of 'Defamation against the President' in light of the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights
Ozguc, Levent Emre
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN RIGHTS, 2025,
[34] What is Hate Speech? Shall and How to Regulate?-Analysis of Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights
Liao, Fort Fu-Te
EURAMERICA, 2015, 45 (04): : 455 - 515
[35] Legal Remedies for Human Rights Violations in the Armed Conflict in Chechnya: The Approach of the European Court of Human Rights in Context
Koroteev, Kirill
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN LEGAL STUDIES, 2010, 1 (02) : 275 - 303
[36] IDENTITY OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE PRINCIPLE NON BIS IN IDEM BEFORE THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
Martinez Canton, Silvia
Perez Cordon, Ruben
REVISTA JURIDICA DE CASTILLA Y LEON, 2020, (52): : 73 - 92
[37] Towards a Due Diligence ⟪Test⟫ in Domestic Violence Cases? On the Recent European Court of Human Rights' Jurisprudence
De Vido, Sara
DIRITTI UMANI E DIRITTO INTERNAZIONALE, 2022, 16 (03) : 613 - 635
[38] FORCED OR COMPULSORY LABOUR: THE CONTEMPORARY MEANING OF AN OLD PHENOMENON IN THE LIGTH OF THE JURISPRUDENCE OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
Lopez Rodriguez, Josune
REVISTA GENERAL DEL DERECHO DEL TRABAJO Y DE LA SEGURIDAD SOCIAL, 2018, (48): : 372 - 417
[39] AUTONOMY OF RELIGIOUS CONFESSIONS, NEUTRALITY OF THE STATE AND PROHIBITION OF ARBITRARINESS IN THE RECENT JURISPRUDENCE OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
Valero Estarellas, Maria Jose
REVISTA GENERAL DE DERECHO CANONICO Y DERECHO ECLESIASTICO DEL ESTADO, 2019, (49):
[40] Judicial Dialogue between the European Court of Human Rights and the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Field of Legal Liability for Posting Hyperlinks
Oreziak, Bartlomiej
INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY LAW REVIEW, 2019, 21 (05) : 432 - 448

← 1 2 3 4 5 →