Changes in the "stages of change" as outcome measures of a smoking cessation intervention: A randomized controlled trial

被引:24
作者
Schumann, Anja [1 ]
John, Ulrich
Rumpf, Hans-Juergen
Hapke, Ulfert
Meyer, Christian
机构
[1] Ernst Moritz Arndt Univ Greifswald, Inst Epidemiol & Social Med, D-17487 Greifswald, Germany
[2] Med Univ Lubeck, Dept Psychiat & Psychotherapy, D-23538 Lubeck, Germany
关键词
transtheoretical model; tobacco smoking; smoking cessation; randomized controlled trial; general population;
D O I
10.1016/j.ypmed.2006.04.003
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objective. Employing changes in the "stages of change" as alternative outcome measures of a smoking cessation intervention. Method. RCT carried out between 2002 and 2004 in Germany with 485 daily cigarette smokers recruited from a general population survey. The intervention was conceptually based on the transtheoretical model, involving individualized feedback letters generated by computerized expert-system technology. Results. Latent transition analysis was applied to test models for patterns of change, to evaluate stage of change distributions and transitions over time, and to compare the intervention and control group. The patterns of change across three time points could best be described by a model including stability, one-stage regressions, and one-to-four-stage progressions. There were no significant differences between the intervention and control group in the stage of change distributions at each time point or in the amount of stage transitions over time. Conclusion. The efficacy of the intervention could not be demonstrated. Reasons may include oversampling of smokers who are interested in health-related topics but do not intend to quit, and power problems due to substantial attrition. (c) 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:101 / 106
页数:6
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   A controlled trial of an expert system and self-help manual intervention based on the stages of change versus standard self-help materials in smoking cessation [J].
Aveyard, P ;
Griffin, C ;
Lawrence, T ;
Cheng, KK .
ADDICTION, 2003, 98 (03) :345-354
[2]  
COLLINS L, 1992, BEST METHODS ANAL CH
[3]  
Collins L M, 1994, NIDA Res Monogr, V142, P81
[4]  
COLLINS LM, 2002, WINLTA USERS GUIDE V
[5]   THE PROCESS OF SMOKING CESSATION - AN ANALYSIS OF PRECONTEMPLATION, CONTEMPLATION, AND PREPARATION STAGES OF CHANGE [J].
DICLEMENTE, CC ;
FAIRHURST, SK ;
VELASQUEZ, MM ;
PROCHASKA, JO ;
VELICER, WF ;
ROSSI, JS .
JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1991, 59 (02) :295-304
[6]   Tailoring information to enhance quitting in smokers with low motivation to quit: Three basic efficacy questions [J].
Dijkstra, A ;
De Vries, H ;
Roijackers, J ;
van Breukelen, G .
HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 1998, 17 (06) :513-519
[7]   Long-term effectiveness of computer-generated tailored feedback in smoking cessation [J].
Dijkstra, A ;
De Vries, H ;
Roijackers, J .
HEALTH EDUCATION RESEARCH, 1998, 13 (02) :207-214
[8]   Assessing 'stage of change' in current and former smokers [J].
Etter, JF ;
Sutton, S .
ADDICTION, 2002, 97 (09) :1171-1182
[9]   Effectiveness of a computer-tailored smoking cessation program - A randomized trial [J].
Etter, JF ;
Perneger, TV .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2001, 161 (21) :2596-2601
[10]   On quitting smoking: Development of two scales measuring the use of self-change strategies in current and former smokers (SCS-CS and SCS-FS) [J].
Etter, JF ;
Bergman, MM ;
Perneger, TV .
ADDICTIVE BEHAVIORS, 2000, 25 (04) :523-538