What is the point: will screening mammography save my life?

被引:24
作者
Keen, John D. [1 ]
Keen, James E. [2 ]
机构
[1] John H Stroger Jr Hosp Cook Cty, Dept Radiol, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
[2] Univ Nebraska, Dept Vet & Biomed Sci, Clay Ctr, NE 68933 USA
关键词
BREAST-CANCER RISK; MEDICAL LITERATURE; RANDOMIZED-TRIALS; AMERICAN-COLLEGE; USERS GUIDES; FOLLOW-UP; WOMEN; 40; MORTALITY; BENEFITS; AGE;
D O I
10.1186/1472-6947-9-18
中图分类号
R-058 [];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: We analyzed the claim "mammography saves lives" by calculating the life-saving absolute benefit of screening mammography in reducing breast cancer mortality in women ages 40 to 65. Methods: To calculate the absolute benefit, we first estimated the screen-free absolute death risk from breast cancer by adjusting the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Program 15-year cumulative breast cancer mortality to account for the separate effects of screening mammography and improved therapy. We calculated the absolute risk reduction (reduction in absolute death risk), the number needed to screen assuming repeated screening, and the survival percentages without and with screening. We varied the relative risk reduction from 10%-30% based on the randomized trials of screening mammography. We developed additional variations of the absolute risk reduction for a screening intervention, including the average benefit of a single screen, as well as the life-saving proportion among patients with earlier cancer detection. Results: Because the screen-free absolute death risk is approximately 1% overall but rises with age, the relative risk reduction from repeated screening mammography is about 100 times the absolute risk reduction between the starting ages of 50 and 60. Assuming a base case 20% relative risk reduction, repeated screening starting at age 50 saves about 1.8 ( overall range, 0.9-2.7) lives over 15 years for every 1000 women screened. The number needed to screen repeatedly is 1000/1.8, or 570. The survival percentage is 99.12% without and 99.29% with screening. The average benefit of a single screening mammogram is 0.034%, or 2970 women must be screened once to save one life. Mammography saves 4.3% of screen-detectable cancer patients' lives starting at age 50. This means 23 cancers must be found starting at age 50, or 27 cancers at age 40 and 21 cancers at age 65, to save one life. Conclusion: The life-saving absolute benefit of screening mammography increases with age as the absolute death risk increases. The number of events needed to save one life varies depending on the prospective screening subset or reference class. Less than 5% of women with screen-detectable cancers have their lives saved.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Quality-of-life effects of screening mammography in Norway
    Zahl, Per-Henrik
    Kalager, Mette
    Suhrke, Pal
    Nord, Erik
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2020, 146 (08) : 2104 - 2112
  • [22] Were Our Estimates of Overdiagnosis With Mammography Screening in the United States "Based on Faulty Science"?
    Bleyer, Archie
    ONCOLOGIST, 2014, 19 (02) : 113 - 126
  • [23] Screening mammography - early detection or over-diagnosis? Contribution from Australian data
    Bell, R. J.
    CLIMACTERIC, 2014, 17 : 66 - 72
  • [24] Factors Influencing Adherence to Mammography Screening Guidelines in Appalachian Women Participating in a Mobile Mammography Program
    Vyas, Ami
    Madhavan, Suresh
    LeMasters, Traci
    Atkins, Elvonna
    Gainor, Sara
    Kennedy, Stephenie
    Kelly, Kimberly
    Vona-Davis, Linda
    Remick, Scot
    JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2012, 37 (03) : 632 - 646
  • [25] Screening Mammography and Breast Cancer Reduction: Examining the Evidence
    Tupper, Ruth
    Holm, Karyn
    JNP-JOURNAL FOR NURSE PRACTITIONERS, 2014, 10 (09): : 117 - 124
  • [26] Association of Health Literacy With Adherence to Screening Mammography Guidelines
    Komenaka, Ian K.
    Nodora, Jesse N.
    Hsu, Chiu-Hsieh
    Martinez, Maria Elena
    Gandhi, Sonal G.
    Bouton, Marcia E.
    Klemens, Anne E.
    Wikholm, Lauren I.
    Weiss, Barry D.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 125 (04) : 852 - 859
  • [27] Radiation risk of breast screening in England with digital mammography
    Warren, Lucy M.
    Dance, David R.
    Young, Kenneth C.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2016, 89 (1067)
  • [28] Is Ultrasound an Accurate Alternative for Mammography in Breast Cancer Screening in an Asian Population? A Meta-Analysis
    Wang, Jing
    Zheng, Senshuang
    Ding, Lanjun
    Liang, Xuan
    Wang, Yuan
    Greuter, Marcel J. W.
    de Bock, Geertruida H.
    Lu, Wenli
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2020, 10 (11)
  • [29] Mammography Screening for Breast Cancer
    Smith, Robert A.
    Kerlikowske, Karla
    Miglioretti, Diana L.
    Kalager, Mette
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2012, 367 (21) : e31(1)
  • [30] Benefits and harms of mammography screening
    Loberg, Magnus
    Lousdal, Mette Lise
    Bretthauer, Michael
    Kalager, Mette
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2015, 17