What is the point: will screening mammography save my life?

被引:24
作者
Keen, John D. [1 ]
Keen, James E. [2 ]
机构
[1] John H Stroger Jr Hosp Cook Cty, Dept Radiol, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
[2] Univ Nebraska, Dept Vet & Biomed Sci, Clay Ctr, NE 68933 USA
关键词
BREAST-CANCER RISK; MEDICAL LITERATURE; RANDOMIZED-TRIALS; AMERICAN-COLLEGE; USERS GUIDES; FOLLOW-UP; WOMEN; 40; MORTALITY; BENEFITS; AGE;
D O I
10.1186/1472-6947-9-18
中图分类号
R-058 [];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: We analyzed the claim "mammography saves lives" by calculating the life-saving absolute benefit of screening mammography in reducing breast cancer mortality in women ages 40 to 65. Methods: To calculate the absolute benefit, we first estimated the screen-free absolute death risk from breast cancer by adjusting the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Program 15-year cumulative breast cancer mortality to account for the separate effects of screening mammography and improved therapy. We calculated the absolute risk reduction (reduction in absolute death risk), the number needed to screen assuming repeated screening, and the survival percentages without and with screening. We varied the relative risk reduction from 10%-30% based on the randomized trials of screening mammography. We developed additional variations of the absolute risk reduction for a screening intervention, including the average benefit of a single screen, as well as the life-saving proportion among patients with earlier cancer detection. Results: Because the screen-free absolute death risk is approximately 1% overall but rises with age, the relative risk reduction from repeated screening mammography is about 100 times the absolute risk reduction between the starting ages of 50 and 60. Assuming a base case 20% relative risk reduction, repeated screening starting at age 50 saves about 1.8 ( overall range, 0.9-2.7) lives over 15 years for every 1000 women screened. The number needed to screen repeatedly is 1000/1.8, or 570. The survival percentage is 99.12% without and 99.29% with screening. The average benefit of a single screening mammogram is 0.034%, or 2970 women must be screened once to save one life. Mammography saves 4.3% of screen-detectable cancer patients' lives starting at age 50. This means 23 cancers must be found starting at age 50, or 27 cancers at age 40 and 21 cancers at age 65, to save one life. Conclusion: The life-saving absolute benefit of screening mammography increases with age as the absolute death risk increases. The number of events needed to save one life varies depending on the prospective screening subset or reference class. Less than 5% of women with screen-detectable cancers have their lives saved.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Commentary on 'What is the point: will screening mammography save my life?' by Keen and Keen
    Duffy, Stephen W.
    BMC MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND DECISION MAKING, 2009, 9
  • [2] Comments on John D. Keen and James E. Keen, What is the point: will screening mammography save my life? BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 2009
    Retsky, Michael
    BMC MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND DECISION MAKING, 2009, 9
  • [3] At what age should screening mammography be recommended for Asian women?
    Tsuchida, Junko
    Nagahashi, Masayuki
    Rashid, Omar M.
    Takabe, Kazuaki
    Wakai, Toshifumi
    CANCER MEDICINE, 2015, 4 (07): : 1136 - 1144
  • [4] Point: Mammography screening-sticking to the science
    Yaffe, M. J.
    CURRENT ONCOLOGY, 2015, 22 (03) : 174 - 176
  • [5] Mammography screening, what does the future hold?
    Serral, Gemma
    Puigpinos-Riera, Rosa
    MEDICINA CLINICA, 2018, 150 (06): : 224 - 225
  • [6] Screening with Mammography Organized by Family Physicians Teams: What Have We Learnt?
    Pribic, Sanda
    Gmajnic, Rudika
    Majnaric-Trtica, Ljiljana
    Ebling, Barbara
    Vranjes, Zeljko
    COLLEGIUM ANTROPOLOGICUM, 2010, 34 (03) : 871 - 876
  • [7] Controversies in Screening Mammography
    Swain, Monique
    Jeudy, Myrlene
    Pearlman, Mark D.
    CLINICAL OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2016, 59 (02) : 351 - 361
  • [8] Risk Stratification for Screening Mammography: Benefits and Harms
    Lee, Cindy S.
    Sickles, Edward A.
    Moy, Linda
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2019, 212 (02) : 250 - 258
  • [9] Geographic access to mammography facilities and frequency of mammography screening
    Jewett, Patricia I.
    Gangnon, Ronald E.
    Elkin, Elena
    Hampton, John M.
    Jacobs, Elizabeth A.
    Malecki, Kristen
    LaGro, James
    Newcomb, Polly A.
    Trentham-Dietz, Amy
    ANNALS OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2018, 28 (02) : 65 - 71
  • [10] Harms of screening mammography for breast cancer in Japanese women
    Kasahara, Yoshio
    Kawai, Masaaki
    Tsuji, Ichiro
    Tohno, Eriko
    Yokoe, Takao
    Irahara, Minoru
    Tangoku, Akira
    Ohuchi, Noriaki
    BREAST CANCER, 2013, 20 (04) : 310 - 315