Supporting evidence varies for rangeland management practices that seek to improve soil properties and forage production in California

被引:8
作者
Carey, Chelsea J. [1 ]
Gravuer, Kelly [2 ,3 ]
Gennet, Sasha [4 ]
Osleger, Dillon [5 ]
Wood, Stephen A. [6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Point Blue Conservat Sci, Petaluma, CA 94954 USA
[2] Arizona State Univ, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
[3] Nature Conservancy, Arlington Cty, VA USA
[4] Nature Conservancy, North Amer Sustainable Grazing Lands, Arlington Cty, VA USA
[5] Natl Ctr Ecol Anal & Synth, Santa Barbara, CA USA
[6] Nature Conservancy, Agr & Food Syst, Arlington Cty, VA USA
[7] Yale Univ, Sch Forestry & Environm Studies, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
关键词
GRAZING INTENSITY; CARBON SEQUESTRATION; GRASSLAND ECOSYSTEMS; NITROGEN DYNAMICS; QUERCUS-DOUGLASII; ORGANIC-CARBON; IMPACTS; METAANALYSIS; SERVICES; SCIENCE;
D O I
10.3733/ca.2020a0015
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
California is increasingly investing in policies and programs that promote soil stewardship on natural and working lands as a way to help achieve multiple goals, including improved forage production and climate change mitigation. To inform the growing expectations for rangeland management activities to promote such services, we conducted an evidence synthesis assessing how four commonly suggested practices (silvopasture, prescribed grazing, compost application and riparian restoration) affect a suite of soil properties and plant-related metrics throughout the state. We extracted data on soil properties that are potentially responsive to management and relevant to soil health. We also extracted data on aboveground forage production, forage nitrogen content and herbaceous species richness. Our search resulted in 399 individual soil observations and 64 individual plant observations. We found that the presence of oaks had the largest effects on soil properties, with soil organic carbon, microbial biomass and other measures of soil fertility increasing beneath oak canopies. The presence of grazing increased compaction and total nitrogen, and decreased pH. Compost applications did not significantly affect any of the measured soil properties, but did boost forage production. Due to a lack of published data, we were unable to characterize the influence of rangeland riparian restoration on any of the soil or plant metrics in our review.
引用
收藏
页码:101 / 111
页数:11
相关论文
共 81 条
[1]   Critical review of the impacts of grazing intensity on soil organic carbon storage and other soil quality indicators in extensively managed grasslands [J].
Abdalla, M. ;
Hastings, A. ;
Chadwick, D. R. ;
Jones, D. L. ;
Evans, C. D. ;
Jones, M. B. ;
Rees, R. M. ;
Smith, P. .
AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 253 :62-81
[2]  
Allen-Diaz B, 2005, PSWGTR195 USDA FOR S
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2004, RIP BIRD CONS PLAN S
[4]   Grazing Intensity and Spatial Heterogeneity in Bare Soil in a Grazing-Resistant Grassland [J].
Augustine, David J. ;
Booth, D. Terrance ;
Cox, Samuel E. ;
Derner, Justin D. .
RANGELAND ECOLOGY & MANAGEMENT, 2012, 65 (01) :39-46
[5]   Effects of residual dry matter on net primary production and plant functional groups in Californian annual grasslands [J].
Bartolome, J. W. ;
Jackson, R. D. ;
Betts, A. D. K. ;
Connor, J. M. ;
Nader, G. A. ;
Tate, K. W. .
GRASS AND FORAGE SCIENCE, 2007, 62 (04) :445-452
[6]  
Battles J. J., 2008, General Technical Report - Pacific Southwest Research Station, USDA Forest Service, P511
[7]   Using nitrogen-15 to quantify vegetative buffer effectiveness for sequestering nitrogen in runoff [J].
Bedard-Haughn, A ;
Tate, KW ;
van Kessel, C .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 2004, 33 (06) :2252-2262
[8]  
Bemhandt F, 2016, GTR25110 USDA FOR SE
[9]   What can ecological science tell us about opportunities for carbon sequestration on arid rangelands in the United States? [J].
Booker, Kayje ;
Huntsinger, Lynn ;
Bartolome, James W. ;
Sayre, Nathan F. ;
Stewart, William .
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2013, 23 (01) :240-251
[10]   Managing Complex Problems in Rangeland Ecosystems [J].
Boyd, Chad S. ;
Svejcar, Tony J. .
RANGELAND ECOLOGY & MANAGEMENT, 2009, 62 (06) :491-499