Sociotechnical agendas: Reviewing future directions for energy and climate research

被引:199
作者
Sovacool, Benjamin K. [1 ,2 ]
Hess, David J. [3 ]
Amir, Sulfikar [4 ]
Geels, Frank W. [4 ]
Hirsh, Richard [5 ]
Medina, Leandro Rodriguez [6 ]
Miller, Clark [7 ]
Palavicino, Carla Alvial [8 ]
Phadke, Roopali [9 ]
Ryghaug, Marianne [9 ]
Schot, Johan [8 ]
Silvast, Antti [10 ]
Stephens, Jennie [11 ]
Stirling, Andy [1 ]
Turnheim, Bruno [12 ]
Vleuten, Erik van der [13 ]
Lente, Harro van [5 ,14 ]
Yearley, Steven [15 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sussex, Brighton, E Sussex, England
[2] Aarhus Univ, Aarhus, Denmark
[3] Vanderbilt Univ, 221 Kirkland Hall, Nashville, TN 37235 USA
[4] Nanyang Technol Univ, Singapore, Singapore
[5] Univ Manchester, Manchester, Lancs, England
[6] Virginia Polytech Inst & State Univ, Blacksburg, VA 24061 USA
[7] Univ Americas Puebla, Cholula, Mexico
[8] Arizona State Univ, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
[9] Univ Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
[10] Macalester Coll, St Paul, MN 55105 USA
[11] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Trondheim, Norway
[12] Northeastern Univ, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[13] Lab Interdisciplinaire Sci Innovat Soc, Marne La Vallee, France
[14] Eindhoven Univ Technol, Eindhoven, Netherlands
[15] Univ Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会; 英国经济与社会研究理事会;
关键词
Science and technology studies; Sociotechnical systems; Science technology and society; Sociology of scientific knowledge; Sustainability transitions; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; LARGE TECHNICAL SYSTEMS; LOW-CARBON TRANSITIONS; SOCIAL-SCIENCE; POLITICAL-ECONOMY; RENEWABLE ENERGY; REGIME DESTABILIZATION; CONTESTED VISIONS; INNOVATION POLICY; ROAD TRANSPORT;
D O I
10.1016/j.erss.2020.101617
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The field of science and technology studies (STS) has introduced and developed a "sociotechnical" perspective that has been taken up by many disciplines and areas of inquiry. The aims and objectives of this study are threefold: to interrogate which sociotechnical concepts or tools from STS are useful at better understanding energy-related social science, to reflect on prominent themes and topics within those approaches, and to identify current research gaps and directions for the future. To do so, the study builds on a companion project, a systematic analysis of 262 articles published from 2009 to mid-2019 that categorized and reviewed sociotechnical perspectives in energy social science. It identifies future research directions by employing the method of "co creation" based on the reflections of sixteen prominent researchers in the field in late 2019 and early 2020. Drawing from this co-created synthesis, this study first identifies three main areas of sociotechnical perspectives in energy research (sociotechnical systems, policy, and expertise and publics) with 15 topics and 39 subareas. The study then identifies five main themes for the future development of sociotechnical perspectives in energy research: conditions of systematic change; embedded agency; justice, power, identity and politics; imaginaries and discourses; and public engagement and governance. It also points to the recognized need for pluralism and parallax: for research to show greater attention to demographic and geographical diversity; to stronger research designs; to greater theoretical triangulation; and to more transdisciplinary approaches.
引用
收藏
页数:35
相关论文
共 319 条
[21]   Framing public engagement: A critical discourse analysis of GM Nation? [J].
Attar, Arif ;
Genus, Audley .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2014, 88 :241-250
[22]   Concerned consumption. Global warming changing household domestication of energy [J].
Aune, Margrethe ;
Godbolt, Asne Lund ;
Sorensen, Knut H. ;
Ryghaug, Marianne ;
Karlstrom, Henrik ;
Naess, Robert .
ENERGY POLICY, 2016, 98 :290-297
[23]   Mismatch or misunderstanding? Calculation and qualculation among economists and consumers in their framings of the electricity market [J].
Aune, Margrethe ;
Godbolt, Asne Lund ;
Sorensen, Knut H. .
ACTA SOCIOLOGICA, 2016, 59 (04) :347-361
[24]  
Backstrand K., 2003, GLOBAL ENVIRON POLIT, V3, P24, DOI DOI 10.1162/152638003322757916
[25]   Arenas of expectations for hydrogen technologies [J].
Bakker, Sjoerd ;
Van Lente, Harro ;
Meeus, Marius .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2011, 78 (01) :152-162
[26]   Energy materiality: A conceptual review of multi-disciplinary approaches [J].
Balmaceda, Margarita ;
Hogselius, Per ;
Johnson, Corey ;
Pleines, Heiko ;
Rogers, Douglas ;
Tynkkynen, Veli-Pekka .
ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2019, 56
[27]   Differentiation, materiality, and power: Towards a political economy of fossil fuels [J].
Balmaceda, Margarita M. .
ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2018, 39 :130-140
[28]   Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment [J].
Benford, RD ;
Snow, DA .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF SOCIOLOGY, 2000, 26 :611-639
[29]   The agency of assemblages and the North American blackout [J].
Bennett, J .
PUBLIC CULTURE, 2005, 17 (03) :445-465
[30]   Transition pathways revisited: Established firms as multi-level actors in the heavy vehicle industry [J].
Berggren, Christian ;
Magnusson, Thomas ;
Sushandoyo, Dedy .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2015, 44 (05) :1017-1028