RATIONAL CREDENCE THROUGH REASONING

被引:0
作者
Dogramaci, Sinan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Austin, Austin, TX 78712 USA
来源
PHILOSOPHERS IMPRINT | 2018年 / 18卷 / 11期
关键词
DUAL-PROCESS THEORIES; COUNTEREXAMPLE; REPRESENTATION; PROBABILITY; INTERNALISM; PSYCHOLOGY; ARGUMENTS; JUDGMENT;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ;
摘要
Whereas Bayesians have proposed norms such as probabilism, which requires immediate and permanent certainty in all logical truths, I propose a framework on which credences, including credences in logical truths, are rational because they are based on reasoning that follows plausible rules for the adoption of credences. I argue that my proposed framework has many virtues. In particular, it resolves the problem of logical omniscience.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 25
页数:25
相关论文
共 108 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1999, WHO IS RATIONAL STUD
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2007, Bayesian rationality: The probabilistic approach to human reasoning
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2001, SCI CONJECTURE EVIDE
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1989, LAWS SYMMETRY, DOI DOI 10.1093/0198248601.001.0001
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2015, The centered mind: What the science of working memory shows us about the nature of human thought
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2009, The Origin of Concepts
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2008, Rationality for mortals: how people cope with uncertainty
[8]  
[Anonymous], 1986, Epistemology and cognition
[9]  
Arpaly NomyTimothy Schroeder., 2014, IN PRAISE OF DESIRE
[10]   What is inference? [J].
Boghossian, Paul .
PHILOSOPHICAL STUDIES, 2014, 169 (01) :1-18