Comparative outcomes of ulnar nerve transposition versus neurolysis in patients with entrapment neuropathy at the cubital tunnel: a 20-year analysis

Entrapment neuropathy of the ulnar nerve at the level of the elbow is the shared domain of multiple surgical specialties. A wide variety of operative methods for its surgical management have been reported. Our hospital utilizes neurolysis (NL) and subcutaneous transposition (AST). The aim of this paper was to compare the clinical outcomes in patients treated by ulnar nerve transposition versus neurolysis over a 20-year period. We included patients who underwent either neurolysis or an ulnar nerve transposition. A retrospective analysis was performed which included 480 patients at our institution between January 1992 and December 2012. In total, physical and electronic records for 480 patients were reviewed. Three-hundred and one underwent ulnar nerve transposition and 179 underwent ulnar nerve neurolysis . In the AST group 201/301 patients suffered from parasthesiae pre-operatively and 156/301 had pain at and around the cubital tunnel. Paresis of the ulnar nerve innervated muscles was present in 99/301 patients. At the 3-month follow-up appointment, 187/201 patients with parasthesiae and 113/156 patients with local pain had resolution of their symptoms. In the NL group 151/179 patients had parasthesiae pre-operatively and 126/179 had pain at and around the cubital tunnel. Paresis of the ulnar nerve innervated muscles was present in 56/179 patients. At the 3-month follow-up appointment, 141/151 patients with parasthesiae and 117/126 patients with local pain had resolution of their symptoms. In cases of ulnar nerve compression at the cubital tunnel, both neurolysis and transposition are effective in improving clinical outcome. The only statistically significant advantage of neurolysis over transposition seems to be relief of localized elbow pain. We recommend neurolysis as the preferred procedure.