Dose-finding based on efficacy-toxicity trade-offs

被引:329
作者
Thall, PF [1 ]
Cook, JD [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Biostat & Appl Math, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
adaptive design; Bayesian design; biologic agents; dose-finding; phase I clinical trial; phase II clinical trial;
D O I
10.1111/j.0006-341X.2004.00218.x
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
We present an adaptive Bayesian method for dose-finding in phase I/II clinical trials based on trade-offs between the probabilities of treatment efficacy and toxicity. The method accommodates either trinary or bivariate binary outcomes, as well as efficacy probabilities that possibly are nonmonotone in dose. Doses are selected for successive patient cohorts based on a set of efficacy-toxicity trade-off contours that partition the two-dimensional outcome probability domain. Priors are established by solving for hyperparameters that optimize the fit of the model to elicited mean outcome probabilities. For trinary outcomes, the new algorithm is compared to the method of Thall and Russell (1998, Biometrics 54, 251-264) by application to a trial of rapid treatment for ischemic stroke. The bivariate binary outcome case is illustrated by a trial of graft-versus-host disease treatment in allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Computer simulations show that, under a wide rage of dose-outcome scenarios, the new method has high probabilities of making correct decisions and treats most patients at doses with desirable efficacy-toxicity trade-offs.
引用
收藏
页码:684 / 693
页数:10
相关论文
共 19 条
  • [1] Patient specific dosing in a cancer phase I clinical trial
    Babb, JS
    Rogatko, A
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2001, 20 (14) : 2079 - 2090
  • [2] The bivariate continual reassessment method: extending the CRM to phase I trials of two competing outcomes
    Braun, TA
    [J]. CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 2002, 23 (03): : 240 - 256
  • [3] Approaches for optimal sequential decision analysis in clinical trials
    Carlin, BP
    Kadane, JB
    Gelfand, AE
    [J]. BIOMETRICS, 1998, 54 (03) : 964 - 975
  • [4] COURIEL D, 2001, 01327 MD AND CANC CT
  • [5] DELIMA M, 2001, 00153 MD AND CANC CT
  • [6] GLONEK GFV, 1995, J ROY STAT SOC B MET, V57, P533
  • [7] SIMULATION AS A DESIGN TOOL FOR PHASE I/II CLINICAL-TRIALS - AN EXAMPLE FROM BONE-MARROW TRANSPLANTATION
    GOOLEY, TA
    MARTIN, PJ
    FISHER, LD
    PETTINGER, M
    [J]. CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 1994, 15 (06): : 450 - 462
  • [8] JOE H, 1997, MULTIV ARIATE MODELS
  • [9] McCullagh P., 1989, Bulletin of the International Statistical Institute, V53, P407
  • [10] McCullagh P., 2018, Generalized Linear Models