Same-occupation spouses: preferences or search costs?

被引:16
作者
Mansour, Hani [1 ,2 ]
McKinnish, Terra [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Colorado Denver, Dept Econ, Campus Box 181, Denver, CO 80217 USA
[2] IZA, Campus Box 181, Denver, CO 80217 USA
[3] Univ Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
关键词
Marital matching; Occupation; Sex composition; Search costs; MARRIAGE MARKET; MATE SELECTION; EDUCATION; HOMOGAMY; TRENDS; OPPORTUNITIES; FEMINIZATION; DIVORCE; MARRY; PAY;
D O I
10.1007/s00148-017-0670-z
中图分类号
C921 [人口统计学];
学科分类号
摘要
Married individuals match with spouses who share their occupation more frequently than should happen by chance if marriage markets are large frictionless search markets covering a particular geographic area. This suggests that either there is a preference for same-occupation matches or that search costs are lower within occupation. This paper uses 2008-2015 data from the American Community Survey to analyze same-occupation matching among a sample of recently married couples. Our empirical strategy compares the difference in wages between same-occupation husbands and different-occupation husbands across occupations with different percent male workers. Under a preference explanation, this difference should become less negative as the share of males in the occupation increases. Under a search cost explanation, this difference should become more negative as the share of males increases. Our results are consistent with the search cost explanation. Furthermore, using an occupation-specific index of workplace communication, we demonstrate that the results are most consistent with the search cost mechanism for occupations with a greater degree of workplace communication. Finally, we show that matching on field of degree for couples in which both spouses have a college degree is also consistent with the search cost explanation.
引用
收藏
页码:1005 / 1033
页数:29
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]   Marrying Up: The Role of Sex Ratio in Assortative Matching [J].
Abramitzky, Ran ;
Delavande, Adeline ;
Vasconcelos, Luis .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC JOURNAL-APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2011, 3 (03) :124-157
[2]   How do sex ratios affect marriage and labor markets? Evidence from America's second generation [J].
Angrist, J .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2002, 117 (03) :997-1038
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2003, WHO MARRIES WHOM ED
[4]   Marry for What? Caste and Mate Selection in Modern India [J].
Banerjee, Abhijit ;
Duflo, Esther ;
Ghatak, Maitreesh ;
Lafortune, Jeanne .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC JOURNAL-MICROECONOMICS, 2013, 5 (02) :33-72
[5]  
Belot M, 2013, J HUM RESOUR, V48, P474
[6]   Trends in Occupational Segregation by Gender 1970-2009: Adjusting for the Impact of Changes in the Occupational Coding System [J].
Blau, Francine D. ;
Brummund, Peter ;
Liu, Albert Yung-Hsu .
DEMOGRAPHY, 2013, 50 (02) :471-492
[7]  
Bloch F, 2000, INT ECON REV, V41, P93
[8]   Educational Assortative Marriage in Comparative Perspective [J].
Blossfeld, Hans-Peter .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF SOCIOLOGY, 2009, 35 :513-530
[9]   Marriage Choices of Movie Stars: Does Spouse's Education Matter? [J].
Bruze, Gustaf .
JOURNAL OF HUMAN CAPITAL, 2011, 5 (01) :1-28
[10]   Marriage and class [J].
Burdett, K ;
Coles, MG .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1997, 112 (01) :141-168