A randomized controlled trial of a smoking cessation intervention for pregnant adolescents

被引:33
|
作者
Albrecht, Susan A. [1 ]
Caruthers, Donna
Patrick, Thelma
Reynolds, Maureen
Salamie, Denise
Higgins, Linda W.
Braxter, Betty
Kim, Yookyung
Mlynarchek, Sara
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Nursing, Antonio J & Janet Palumbo Cystic Fibrosis Ctr, Pittsburgh, PA 15261 USA
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Pharm, Pittsburgh, PA 15261 USA
[3] Childrens Hosp Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
关键词
adolescence; pregnancy; smoking cessation;
D O I
10.1097/00006199-200611000-00004
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Background: The smoking prevalence rate among pregnant adolescents has been estimated at 59-62%, and 60-80% of these adolescents continue to smoke throughout their pregnancies. Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the short- and long-term effects. of smoking cessation strategies tailored to the pregnant adolescent to attain and maintain abstinence. The specific aim was to examine differences in short- and long-term smoking behaviors among three groups: Teen FreshStart (TFS), Teen FreshStart Plus Buddy TFS-B, and Usual Care (UC) control. Methods: In this randomized controlled intervention study, a 3-group (TFS, TFS-B, and UC) by 3-occasion (baseline, 8 weeks postrandomization, and 1-year following study entry) design was used. The study included 142 pregnant adolescents who were aged 14 to 19 years. Both self-reported smoking status collected on the Smoking History Questionnaire and saliva cotinine levels were used to identify smoking behaviors. Results: There were no significant differences among the three treatment groups at baseline in terms of the racial, distribution, age, gestational age, age of menses initiation, number in family household, number of family members who smoked, or tobacco use. A significant difference be tween the UC group and the TFS-B group (p = .010) was seen in smoking behaviors measured 8 weeks following treatment initiation. At 1 year following study entry, however, there were no differences between the groups in smoking behaviors. Discussion: The TFS-B intervention was more effective in attaining short-term smoking cessation in the pregnant adolescent than TFS or UC. Findings suggest that the peer-enhanced programming had a limited effect but could not sustain the participant beyond postpartum (1 year following study entry). Future studies should include relapse prevention to sustain smoking abstinence into the postpartum period.
引用
收藏
页码:402 / 410
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The role of gender in a smoking cessation intervention: a cluster randomized clinical trial
    Diana Puente
    Carmen Cabezas
    Teresa Rodriguez-Blanco
    Carmen Fernández-Alonso
    Tránsito Cebrian
    Miguel Torrecilla
    Lourdes Clemente
    Carlos Martín
    BMC Public Health, 11
  • [42] Immediate, Remote Smoking Cessation Intervention in Participants Undergoing a Targeted Lung Health Check Quit Smoking Lung Health Intervention Trial, a Randomized Controlled Trial
    Williams, Parris J.
    Philip, Keir E. J.
    Gill, Navjot Kaur
    Flannery, Deirdre
    Buttery, Sara
    Bartlett, Emily C.
    Devaraj, Anand
    Kemp, Samuel, V
    Addis, Jamie
    Derbyshire, Jane
    Chen, Michelle
    Morris, Katie
    Laverty, Anthony A.
    Hopkinson, Nicholas S.
    CHEST, 2023, 163 (02) : 455 - 463
  • [43] A Text Message Delivered Smoking Cessation Intervention: The Initial Trial of TXT-2-Quit: Randomized Controlled Trial
    Bock, Beth
    Heron, Kristin
    Jennings, Ernestine
    Morrow, Kathleen
    Cobb, Victoria
    Magee, Joshua
    Fava, Joseph
    Deutsch, Christopher
    Foster, Robert
    JMIR MHEALTH AND UHEALTH, 2013, 1 (02):
  • [44] Smoking cessation intervention in parents of young children: a randomised controlled trial
    Abdullah, ASM
    Mak, YW
    Loke, AY
    Lam, TH
    ADDICTION, 2005, 100 (11) : 1731 - 1740
  • [45] Biomarker feedback intervention for smoking cessation among Alaska Native pregnant women: Randomized pilot study
    Patten, Christi A.
    Koller, Kathryn R.
    Flanagan, Christie A.
    Hiratsuka, Vanessa Y.
    Hughes, Christine A.
    Wolfe, Abbie W.
    Decker, Paul A.
    Fruth, Kristin
    Brockman, Tabetha A.
    Korpela, Molly
    Gamez, Diana
    Bronars, Carrie
    Murphy, Neil J.
    Hatsukami, Dorothy
    Benowitz, Neal L.
    Thomas, Timothy K.
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2019, 102 (03) : 528 - 535
  • [46] Brief intervention on maternal smoking:: a randomized controlled trial
    Yilmaz, G
    Karacan, C
    Yöney, A
    Yilmaz, T
    CHILD CARE HEALTH AND DEVELOPMENT, 2006, 32 (01) : 73 - 79
  • [47] A controlled study of a cigarette smoking cessation intervention for adolescents in substance abuse treatment
    Myers, MG
    Brown, SA
    PSYCHOLOGY OF ADDICTIVE BEHAVIORS, 2005, 19 (02) : 230 - 233
  • [48] Integrating smoking cessation into routine care in hospitalsa randomized controlled trial
    Thomas, D.
    Abramson, M. J.
    Bonevski, B.
    Taylor, S.
    Poole, S. G.
    Paul, E.
    Weeks, G. R.
    Dooley, M. J.
    George, J.
    ADDICTION, 2016, 111 (04) : 714 - 723
  • [49] Randomized, controlled, double-blind trial of taranabant for smoking cessation
    Morrison, Mary F.
    Ceesay, Paulette
    Gantz, Ira
    Kaufman, Keith D.
    Lines, Christopher R.
    PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2010, 209 (03) : 245 - 253
  • [50] Increasing smoking cessation care in a preoperative clinic: a randomized controlled trial
    Wolfenden, L
    Wiggers, J
    Knight, J
    Campbell, E
    Spigelman, A
    Kerridge, R
    Moore, K
    PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2005, 41 (01) : 284 - 290