A randomized controlled trial of a smoking cessation intervention for pregnant adolescents

被引:33
|
作者
Albrecht, Susan A. [1 ]
Caruthers, Donna
Patrick, Thelma
Reynolds, Maureen
Salamie, Denise
Higgins, Linda W.
Braxter, Betty
Kim, Yookyung
Mlynarchek, Sara
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Nursing, Antonio J & Janet Palumbo Cystic Fibrosis Ctr, Pittsburgh, PA 15261 USA
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Pharm, Pittsburgh, PA 15261 USA
[3] Childrens Hosp Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
关键词
adolescence; pregnancy; smoking cessation;
D O I
10.1097/00006199-200611000-00004
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Background: The smoking prevalence rate among pregnant adolescents has been estimated at 59-62%, and 60-80% of these adolescents continue to smoke throughout their pregnancies. Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the short- and long-term effects. of smoking cessation strategies tailored to the pregnant adolescent to attain and maintain abstinence. The specific aim was to examine differences in short- and long-term smoking behaviors among three groups: Teen FreshStart (TFS), Teen FreshStart Plus Buddy TFS-B, and Usual Care (UC) control. Methods: In this randomized controlled intervention study, a 3-group (TFS, TFS-B, and UC) by 3-occasion (baseline, 8 weeks postrandomization, and 1-year following study entry) design was used. The study included 142 pregnant adolescents who were aged 14 to 19 years. Both self-reported smoking status collected on the Smoking History Questionnaire and saliva cotinine levels were used to identify smoking behaviors. Results: There were no significant differences among the three treatment groups at baseline in terms of the racial, distribution, age, gestational age, age of menses initiation, number in family household, number of family members who smoked, or tobacco use. A significant difference be tween the UC group and the TFS-B group (p = .010) was seen in smoking behaviors measured 8 weeks following treatment initiation. At 1 year following study entry, however, there were no differences between the groups in smoking behaviors. Discussion: The TFS-B intervention was more effective in attaining short-term smoking cessation in the pregnant adolescent than TFS or UC. Findings suggest that the peer-enhanced programming had a limited effect but could not sustain the participant beyond postpartum (1 year following study entry). Future studies should include relapse prevention to sustain smoking abstinence into the postpartum period.
引用
收藏
页码:402 / 410
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Pilot randomized controlled trial of an internet-based smoking cessation intervention for pregnant smokers ('MumsQuit')
    Herbec, Aleksandra
    Brown, Jamie
    Tombor, Ildiko
    Michie, Susan
    West, Robert
    DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE, 2014, 140 : 130 - 136
  • [2] Randomized trial of a "stage-of-change" oriented smoking cessation intervention in infertile and pregnant women
    Hughes, EG
    Lamont, DA
    Beecroff, ML
    Wilson, DMC
    Brennan, BG
    Rice, SC
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2000, 74 (03) : 498 - 503
  • [3] A randomized controlled trial of a smoking cessation intervention conducted among prisoners
    Richmond, Robyn
    Indig, Devon
    Butler, Tony
    Wilhelm, Kay
    Archer, Vicki
    Wodak, Alex
    ADDICTION, 2013, 108 (05) : 966 - 974
  • [4] Effect of a pediatric practice-based smoking prevention and cessation intervention for adolescents: A randomized, controlled trial
    Pbert, Lori
    Flint, Alan J.
    Fletcher, Kenneth E.
    Young, Martin H.
    Druker, Susan
    DiFranza, Joseph R.
    PEDIATRICS, 2008, 121 (04) : E738 - E747
  • [5] The emergency department as a potential site for smoking cessation intervention: A randomized, controlled trial
    Richman, PB
    Dinowitz, S
    Nashed, AH
    Eskin, B
    Sylvan, E
    Allegra, C
    Allegra, J
    Mandell, M
    ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2000, 7 (04) : 348 - 353
  • [6] Smoking cessation in pregnant women: A randomized controlled trial investigating the effectiveness of an eHealth intervention including heart rate variability-biofeedback training
    Van Dijk, Willeke
    Oosterman, Mirjam
    De Vente, Wieke
    Jansen, Imke
    Blankers, Matthijs
    Huizink, Anja C.
    ADDICTIVE BEHAVIORS, 2024, 154
  • [7] A school nurse-delivered adolescent smoking cessation intervention: A randomized controlled trial
    Pbert, Lori
    Osganian, Stavroula K.
    Gorak, Diane
    Druker, Susan
    Reed, George
    O'Neill, Katherine M.
    Sheetz, Anne
    PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2006, 43 (04) : 312 - 320
  • [8] Smoking cessation intervention for patients with head and neck cancer: A prospective randomized controlled trial
    Smaily, Hussein
    Khalaf, Michel
    Melkane, Antoine E.
    Helou, Diane
    Richa, Tony
    Khoury, Clement
    Azoury, Fares
    Farha, Georges
    Haddad, Amine
    Matar, Nayla
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2021, 42 (01)
  • [9] Intervention study for smoking cessation in Spanish college students: pragmatic randomized controlled trial
    Pardavila-Belio, Miren I.
    Garcia-Vivar, Cristina
    Pimenta, Adriano Marcal
    Canga-Armayor, Ana
    Pueyo-Garrigues, Sara
    Canga-Armayor, Navidad
    ADDICTION, 2015, 110 (10) : 1676 - 1683
  • [10] Text messaging as an addition to an internet based smoking cessation intervention: a randomized controlled trial
    Nilsen, Olav
    Wangberg, Silje Camilla
    Gram, Inger Torhild
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTEGRATED CARE, 2016, 16