Short- and long-term outcomes of totally robotic versus robotic-assisted right hemicolectomy for colon cancer A retrospective study

被引:16
|
作者
Liu, Dongning [1 ]
Li, Jieming [2 ]
He, Penghui [1 ]
Tang, Cheng [1 ]
Lei, Xiong [1 ]
Jiang, Qunguang [1 ]
Li, Taiyuan [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanchang Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Gen Surg, Nanchang 330006, Jiangxi, Peoples R China
[2] Jiangxi Prov Peoples Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, Nanchang, Jiangxi, Peoples R China
关键词
colon cancer; right hemicolectomy; robotic surgery; LAPAROSCOPIC RIGHT HEMICOLECTOMY; INTRACORPOREAL ANASTOMOSIS; SIGMOID COLECTOMIES; SURGERY; EXTRACORPOREAL; RESECTION; BENIGN;
D O I
10.1097/MD.0000000000015028
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Totally robotic right hemicolectomy (TRRH) is a novel alternative surgical method used for the treatment of colon cancer. The aim of this study was to compare both the short-and long-term outcomes of TRRH and robotic-assisted right hemicolectomy (RARH) for the treatment of colon cancer. We performed a 1: 2 matched propensity score analysis. We then retrospectively analyzed all procedures (64 cases TRRH and 128 cases RARH) carried out by a single surgeon between December 4, 2014 and June 20, 2018 at a large center. Both short-and long-term surgical outcomes were compared between 2 different groups. Based on the propensity score matching, we selected 64 patients that had undergone TRRH treatment and 128 patients who had undergone RARH treatment. The preoperative clinical-pathological characteristics were well matched between the 2 groups. We observed no significant differences between the 2 groups in postoperative pathological outcomes. The mean operative time was found to be significantly longer in the TRRH group compared to the RARH group (168.2 +/- 9.1 minutes vs 153.4 +/- 7.4 minutes, P=.034). The mean operative incision length was found to be significantly longer in the TRRH group than in the RARH group (4.5 +/- 0.6 cm vs 6.9 +/- 1.1 cm, P=.023). Postoperative pain score (visual analog scale at day 1) was found to be significantly lower in the TRRH group than in the RARH group (2.9 +/- 1.3 vs 4.1 +/- 2.1, P=.005). The time to pass flatus was observed to be statistically lower in the TRRH group (P=.042). We observed 3 twists of mesentery in the RARH group, while none were observed in the TRRH group (P<.050). Both the 3-year overall survival (TRRH [91.6%] vs RARH [89.2%], P=.467) and the 3-year disease-free survival (TRRH [81.4%] vs RARH [78.2%], P=.551) were determined to be comparable between the 2 groups studied here. We show that TRRH is a safe and feasible treatment option for colon cancer patients in terms of both short-and long-term outcomes. High-volume, randomized, controlled trials with sufficient follow-up studies will need to be carried out in order to confirm this rationale.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Robotic-assisted colectomy for right-sided colon cancer: Short-term surgical outcomes of a multi-institutional prospective cohort study in Japan
    Yamauchi, Shinichi
    Shiomi, Akio
    Matsuda, Chu
    Takemasa, Ichiro
    Hanai, Tsunekazu
    Uemura, Mamoru
    Kinugasa, Yusuke
    ANNALS OF GASTROENTEROLOGICAL SURGERY, 2023, 7 (06): : 932 - 939
  • [22] Robotic versus laparoscopic anterior resection of sigmoid colon cancer: comparative study of long-term oncologic outcomes
    Lim, Dae Ro
    Min, Byung Soh
    Kim, Min Sung
    Alasari, Sami
    Kim, Gangmi
    Hur, Hyuk
    Baik, Seung Hyuk
    Lee, Kang Young
    Kim, Nam Kyu
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2013, 27 (04): : 1379 - 1385
  • [23] Short-term outcomes of robotic-assisted right colectomy compared with laparoscopic surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ma, Shixun
    Chen, Yan
    Chen, Yifeng
    Guo, Tiankang
    Yang, Xiongfei
    Lu, Yufeng
    Tian, Jinhui
    Cai, Hui
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2019, 42 (05) : 589 - 598
  • [24] Comparison of Short- and Long-Term Outcomes of an Early Experience with Robotic and Laparoscopic-Assisted Resection for Rectal Cancer
    Yoon, Sang Nam
    Kim, Kwang Yong
    Kim, Ji Won
    Lee, Seung Chul
    Kwon, Yong Jin
    Cho, Ji Woong
    Jung, So Young
    Kim, Byung Chun
    HEPATO-GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2015, 62 (137) : 34 - 39
  • [25] Short- and long-term outcomes of robotic- versus laparoscopic-assisted early-onset gastric cancer: a propensity score-matched retrospective cohort study
    Qiao, Yihuan
    Kang, Boyu
    Zhang, Yichao
    Song, Jiawei
    Liu, Shuai
    Wang, Qi
    Guo, Yajie
    Li, Yunlong
    Zhu, Jun
    Li, Jipeng
    BMC CANCER, 2025, 25 (01)
  • [26] Short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision for colon cancer in the elderly: A retrospective cohort study
    Wu, Huawen
    Chen, Guofu
    Li, Wenhuan
    Xu, Lewei
    Jin, Pengfei
    Zheng, Zhijian
    JOURNAL OF BUON, 2020, 25 (04): : 1832 - 1839
  • [27] Robotic versus laparoscopic right colectomy for cancer: short-term outcomes and influence of Body Mass Index on conversion rate
    Cardinali, Luca
    Belfiori, Giulio
    Ghiselli, Roberto
    Ortenzi, Monica
    Guerrieri, Mario
    MINERVA CHIRURGICA, 2016, 71 (04) : 217 - 222
  • [28] Robotic versus laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with complete mesocolic excision: a retrospective multicenter study with propensity score matching
    Tian, Yue
    Xiong, Dehai
    Xu, Ming
    Fan, Qi
    Zheng, Huichao
    Shen, Haode
    Huang, Bin
    Wang, Li
    Li, Chunxue
    Zhang, Anping
    Liu, Baohua
    Li, Fan
    Gao, Feng
    Tong, Weidong
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2023, 13
  • [29] Long-term oncologic after robotic versus laparoscopic right colectomy: a prospective randomized study
    Park, Jun Seok
    Kang, Hyun
    Park, Soo Yeun
    Kim, Hye Jin
    Woo, In Teak
    Park, In-Kyu
    Choi, Gyu-Seog
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2019, 33 (09): : 2975 - 2981
  • [30] Robotic versus open total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: Comparative study of short and long-term outcomes
    Ghezzi, T. L.
    Luca, F.
    Valvo, M.
    Corleta, O. C.
    Zuccaro, M.
    Cenciarelli, S.
    Biffi, R.
    EJSO, 2014, 40 (09): : 1072 - 1079