Next generation engagement: Setting a research agenda for community engagement in Australia's infrastructure sector

被引:25
作者
Bice, Sara [1 ,2 ]
Neely, Kate [3 ]
Einfeld, Colette [1 ]
机构
[1] Australian Natl Univ, Crawford Sch Publ Policy, Canberra, ACT 2600, Australia
[2] Tsinghua Univ, Sch Publ Policy & Management, Ctr Publ Private Partnerships, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Melbourne, Melbourne Sch Govt, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
关键词
codesign; community engagement; infrastructure; research agenda; PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS; SOCIAL LICENSE; IMPACT ASSESSMENT; POLICY CHANGE; PARTICIPATION; OPERATE; CONTRADICTIONS; COPRODUCTION; DESIGN; ISSUES;
D O I
10.1111/1467-8500.12381
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; D035 [国家行政管理]; D523 [行政管理]; D63 [国家行政管理];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ; 1204 ; 120401 ;
摘要
The global infrastructure sector is thriving. But community opposition to major projects is also rising. Australian examples demonstrate the policy backflips, reputational pitfalls, and financial costs of project delays and cancellations. Failures to engage communities are surprising, given the widespread adoption of community engagement (CE) principles and the increasing professionalization of CE roles. If acceptance of the need for CE in infrastructure is more widespread than ever, why are we not seeing smoother project delivery, reduced protest, and cost savings? This paradox is the driving force behind the Next Generation Engagement project. This article offers a practitioners' perspective to introduce the project and present key findings from its 12-month pilot study aiming to establish a transdisciplinary, industry-led research agenda for CE in Australia's infrastructure sector. The article contributes to our understanding of CE literature and research codesign. It maps out the top five priority themes for future research to support infrastructure selection, planning and delivery. The research agenda provides guidance for policy, and practice, offering consolidated, research-based insights for policymakers and practitioners.
引用
收藏
页码:290 / 310
页数:21
相关论文
共 75 条
[1]   Deliberations about deliberative methods: issues in the design and evaluation of public participation processes [J].
Abelson, J ;
Forest, PG ;
Eyles, J ;
Smith, P ;
Martin, E ;
Gauvin, FP .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2003, 57 (02) :239-251
[2]  
Albrecht G., 2005, Philosophy Activism Nature, V3, P41, DOI [10.4225/03/584f410704696, DOI 10.4225/03/584F410704696]
[3]   Co-Production of Public Services in Australia: The Roles of Government Organisations and Co-Producers [J].
Alford, John ;
Yates, Sophie .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2016, 75 (02) :159-175
[4]  
[Anonymous], YB 2015 AUSTR INFR S
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2015, COMPLEXITIES GLOBAL
[6]  
[Anonymous], VICT INFR PLAN
[7]  
[Anonymous], SOC IMP ASS GUID MAR
[8]  
[Anonymous], IAP2 FED 2016 YEAR R
[9]  
[Anonymous], ANN REP INFR AUSTR R
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2009, WHY DELIBERATIVE DEM