Effective dose of escitalopram in moderate versus severe DSM-IV major depression

被引:43
作者
Bech, P. [1 ]
Andersen, H. F.
Wade, A.
机构
[1] Frederiksborg Cent Cty Hosp, Psychiat Res Unit, DK-3400 Hillerod, Denmark
[2] H Lundbeck, Dept Biostat, Copenhagen, Denmark
[3] CPS Clin Res Ctr, Glasgow, Lanark, Scotland
关键词
D O I
10.1055/s-2006-946702
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Introduction: Data from the three available placebo-controlled trials with fixed doses of escitalopram in the acute therapy of DSM-IV major depressive disorder (MDD) were pooled. The hypothesis tested was that escitalopram 10 mg/d might be an effective dose in moderate MDD, whereas escitalopram 20 mg/d might be needed in severe depression. Methods: The Montgomery-Asberg Depression Scale with all 10 items was used at baseline to differentiate between moderate (score range 22 to 29) and severe (scores >= 30) major depression. The MADRS(6) was selected as the primary efficacy parameter, using a standardised effect size of 0.40 as indicator of clincally significant response. Results: After 8 weeks of therapy, escitalopram 10 mg was superior to placebo, with a standardised effect size above 0.40 for patients with moderate depression, but not for those with severe depression. In contrast, 20 mg escitalopram was superior to placebo, with a standardised effect size above 0.40 in severe depression, but not in moderate depression. The MADRS(6) showed response (standardised effect sizes above 0.40) for moderate depression after two weeks of treatment with 10 mg: escitalopram and in severely depressed patients after 4 weeks with 20 mg escitalopram. Conclusion: Escitalopram 10 mg/d was the optimal dose for the treatment of moderate DSM-IV MDD, while escitalopram 20 mg/d was an effective dose in patients with moderate to severe depression.
引用
收藏
页码:128 / 134
页数:7
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1993, INT CLASS DIS 10 REV
[2]   The Hamilton depression rating scale: Has the gold standard become a lead weight? [J].
Bagby, RM ;
Ryder, AG ;
Schuller, DR ;
Marshall, MB .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2004, 161 (12) :2163-2177
[3]   Amitriptyline v. the rest:: still the leading antidepressant after 40 years of randomised controlled trials [J].
Barbui, C ;
Hotopf, M .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2001, 178 :129-144
[4]   Escitalopram dose-response revisited: an alternative psychometric approach to evaluate clinical effects of escitalopram compared to citalopram and placebo in patients with major depression [J].
Bech, P ;
Tanghoj, P ;
Cialdella, P ;
Andersen, HF ;
Pedersen, AG .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2004, 7 (03) :283-290
[5]   Meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials of fluoxetine v. placebo and tricyclic antidepressants in the short-term treatment of major depression [J].
Bech, P ;
Cialdella, P ;
Haugh, MC ;
Birkett, MA ;
Hours, A ;
Boissel, JP ;
Tollefson, GD .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2000, 176 :421-428
[6]  
BECH P, 2002, DEPRESSIVE DISORDERS
[7]  
BULPITT CJ, 1988, LANCET, V2, P93
[8]   Fixed-dose trial of the single isomer SSRI escitalopram in depressed outpatients [J].
Burke, WJ ;
Gergel, I ;
Bose, A .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2002, 63 (04) :331-336
[9]   The S-enantiomer of R,S-citalopram, increases inhibitor binding to the human serotonin transporter by an allosteric mechanism.: Comparison with other serotonin transporter inhibitors [J].
Chen, FH ;
Larsen, MB ;
Sánchez, C ;
Wiborg, O .
EUROPEAN NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2005, 15 (02) :193-198
[10]  
Cohen J., 1988, STAT POWER ANAL BEHA