Measuring Energy Efficiency and Environmental Performance: A Case of South Asia

被引:94
作者
Hou, Yumei [1 ]
Iqbal, Wasim [1 ]
Shaikh, Ghulam Muhammad [2 ]
Iqbal, Nadeem [3 ]
Solangi, Yasir Ahmad [4 ]
Fatima, Arooj [1 ]
机构
[1] Yanshan Univ, Coll Econ & Management, Qinhuangdao 066004, Hebei, Peoples R China
[2] Bahria Univ, Dept Comp Sci, Karachi Campus, Karachi 74800, Pakistan
[3] Ghazai Univ, Fac Management Sci, Dept Finance, Dg Khan 322000, Pakistan
[4] Nanjing Univ Aeronaut & Astronaut, Coll Econ & Management, Nanjing 210000, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
关键词
energy efficiency; environmental performance; energy efficiency indicators; South Asia region; RENEWABLE ENERGY; COMPOSITE INDICATORS; DECISION-ANALYSIS; SUPPLY SECURITY; SUSTAINABILITY; CONSUMPTION; CHALLENGES; INDEX; INDIA; GENERATION;
D O I
10.3390/pr7060325
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
When assessing energy efficiency, most studies have frequently ignored environmental aspects even though the concept has been widely used in the past. This study evaluates the energy efficiency and environmental performance of South Asia by using DEA (data envelopment analysis) like mathematical composite indicator. We construct a comprehensive set of indicators, including an energy self-sufficiency ratio, energy production over consumption ratio, energy imports, diversification index of energy imports, energy reserve ratio, GDP productivity, energy intensity, per capita energy consumption index, carbon emission index, carbon emission index per unit of energy consumption and share of renewable energy in order to develop an energy efficiency and environmental performance index. Unlike other studies, this study first examines each indicator and then estimates a combined score for each country. The results reveal that Bhutan as a more secure country and Pakistan showed a decreasing trend, while Sri Lanka and India performed satisfactorily. Remarkably, Bangladesh, Nepal and Afghanistan showed a decreasing trend. This study proposes a policy that increases the cross-border trade of renewable energy for long term energy efficiency and environmental performance.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 61 条
[11]  
Conti J., 2016, International energy outlook
[12]   A comparison of environmental and energetic performance of European countries: A sustainability index [J].
Cucchiella, Federica ;
D'Adamo, Idiano ;
Gastaldi, Massimo ;
Koh, S. C. Lenny ;
Rosa, Paolo .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2017, 78 :401-413
[13]   Role of renewable energy and non-renewable energy consumption on EKC: Evidence from Pakistan [J].
Danish ;
Zhang, Bin ;
Wang, Bo ;
Wang, Zhaohua .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 156 :855-864
[14]   Energy consumption and activity patterns: An analysis extended to total time and energy use for French households [J].
De Lauretis, Simona ;
Ghersi, Frederic ;
Cayla, Jean-Michel .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2017, 206 :634-648
[15]   In search of a natural systems sustainability index [J].
Diaz-Balteiro, L ;
Romero, C .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2004, 49 (03) :401-405
[16]  
Dincer I., 2018, Exergetic, Energ Environ Dimens, DOI [DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-813734-5.00001-9, 10.1016/B978-0-12-813734-5.00001-9, 10.1016/b978-0-12-813734-5.00001-9]
[17]   Composite indicator for measuring corporate sustainability [J].
Docekalova, Marie Pavlakova ;
Kocmanova, Alena .
ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2016, 61 :612-623
[18]   Meaningful environmental indices: a social choice approach [J].
Ebert, U ;
Welsch, H .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2004, 47 (02) :270-283
[19]   Structural changes of global power generation capacity towards sustainability and the risk of stranded investments supported by a sustainability indicator [J].
Farfan, Javier ;
Breyer, Christian .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 141 :370-384
[20]   Design of coordinated energy and environmental policies: use of multi-criteria decision-making [J].
Greening, LA ;
Bernow, S .
ENERGY POLICY, 2004, 32 (06) :721-735