Transcranial direct current stimulation for gait recovery following stroke: A systematic review of current literature and beyond

被引:4
|
作者
Corominas-Teruel, Xavier [1 ,2 ]
Mozo, Rosa Maria San Segundo [3 ]
Simo, Montserrat Fibla [3 ]
Colomina Fosch, Maria Teresa [1 ]
Valero-Cabre, Antoni [2 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Rovira i Virgili, Neurobehav & Hlth Res Grp NEUROLAB, Dept Psychol, Tarragona, Spain
[2] CNRS, UMR 7225, Inst Cerveau & Moelle Epiniere, Cerebral Dynam,Plast & Rehabil Grp, Paris, France
[3] Hosp Universitari Joan XXIII, Rehabil & Phys Med Dept, Tarragona, Spain
[4] Open Univ Catalonia UOC, Cognit Neurosci & Informat Tech Res Program, Barcelona, Spain
[5] Boston Univ, Sch Med, Lab Cerebral Dynam, Dept Anat & Neurobiol, Boston, MA 02118 USA
来源
FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY | 2022年 / 13卷
关键词
non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS); transcranial direct cortical stimulation (tDCS); stroke; neurorehabilitation; neuromodulation; gait rehabilitation; biophysical modeling; MOTOR RECOVERY; CORTICAL EXCITABILITY; COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT; CLINICAL-TRIALS; ISCHEMIC-STROKE; DOUBLE-BLIND; PILOT; REHABILITATION; OUTPUT; INHIBITION;
D O I
10.3389/fneur.2022.953939
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Over the last decade, transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has set promise contributing to post-stroke gait rehabilitation. Even so, results are still inconsistent due to low sample size, heterogeneity of samples, and tDCS design differences preventing comparability. Nonetheless, updated knowledge in post-stroke neurophysiology and stimulation technologies opens up opportunities to massively improve treatments. Objective: The current systematic review aims to summarize the current state-of-the-art on the effects of tDCS applied to stroke subjects for gait rehabilitation, discuss tDCS strategies factoring individual subject profiles, and highlight new promising strategies. Methods: MEDLINE, SCOPUS, CENTRAL, and CINAHL were searched for stroke randomized clinical trials using tDCS for the recovery of gait before 7 February 2022. In order to provide statistical support to the current review, we analyzed the achieved effect sizes and performed statistical comparisons. Results: A total of 24 records were finally included in our review, totaling n = 651 subjects. Detailed analyses revealed n = 4 (17%) studies with large effect sizes (>= 0.8), n = 6 (25%) studies with medium ones (>= 0.5), and n = 6 (25%) studies yielding low effects sizes (<= 0.2). Statistically significant negative correlations (rho = -0.65, p = 0.04) and differences (p = 0.03) argued in favor of tDCS interventions in the sub-acute phase. Finally, significant differences (p = 0.03) were argued in favor of a bifocal stimulation montage (anodal M1 ipsilesional and cathodal M1 contralesional) with respect to anodal ipsilesional M1. Conclusion: Our systematic review highlights the potential of tDCS to contribute to gait recovery following stroke, although also the urgent need to improve current stimulation strategies and subject-customized interventions considering stroke severity, type or time-course, and the use of network-based multifocal stimulation approaches guided by computational biophysical modeling.
引用
收藏
页数:30
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Stroke Recovery
    Schlaug, Gottfried
    Renga, Vijay
    Nair, Dinesh
    ARCHIVES OF NEUROLOGY, 2008, 65 (12) : 1571 - 1576
  • [2] The Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Balance and Gait in Stroke Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Dong, Ke
    Meng, Shifeng
    Guo, Ziqi
    Zhang, Rufang
    Xu, Panpan
    Yuan, Erfen
    Lian, Tao
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY, 2021, 12
  • [3] Safety Review of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Stroke
    Russo, Cristina
    Carneiro, Maira I. Souza
    Bolognini, Nadia
    Fregni, Felipe
    NEUROMODULATION, 2017, 20 (03): : 215 - 222
  • [4] Transcranial direct current stimulation in neglect rehabilitation after stroke: a systematic review
    B. González-Rodriguez
    N. Serradell-Ribé
    R. Viejo-Sobera
    J. P. Romero-Muñoz
    Elena M. Marron
    Journal of Neurology, 2022, 269 : 6310 - 6329
  • [5] Effects of Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Patients with Stroke: a Systematic Review
    Li Hong-yu
    Zhang Zhi-jie
    Li Juan
    Xiong Ting
    He Wei-chun
    Zhu Ning
    The Cerebellum, 2023, 22 : 973 - 984
  • [6] Effects of Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Patients with Stroke: a Systematic Review
    Li Hong-yu
    Zhang Zhi-jie
    Li Juan
    Xiong Ting
    He Wei-chun
    Zhu Ning
    CEREBELLUM, 2023, 22 (05): : 973 - 984
  • [7] Transcranial direct current stimulation in neglect rehabilitation after stroke: a systematic review
    Gonzalez-Rodriguez, B.
    Serradell-Ribe, N.
    Viejo-Sobera, R.
    Romero-Munoz, J. P.
    Marron, Elena M.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2022, 269 (12) : 6310 - 6329
  • [8] Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS): is it effective as a stroke therapy?: a systematic review
    Marquez, J.
    Van Vliet, P.
    McElduff, P.
    Lagopoulos, J.
    Parsons, M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STROKE, 2013, 8 : 11 - 11
  • [9] Review of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Poststroke Recovery
    Feng, Wuwei
    Bowden, Mark G.
    Kautz, Steven
    TOPICS IN STROKE REHABILITATION, 2013, 20 (01) : 68 - 77
  • [10] Review of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Poststroke Recovery
    Feng, Wuwei
    Bowden, Mark G.
    Kautz, Steven
    NATURAL RESOURCES AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT II, PTS 1-4, 2012, 524-527 : 68 - +