CANCER RISK FROM LOW DOSE RADIATION DEPENDS DIRECTLY ON THE ORGAN MASS IN A GENERAL MODEL OF RADIATION- INDUCED CANCER RISK

被引:2
作者
Lin, Z. W. [1 ]
机构
[1] E Carolina Univ, Dept Phys, Greenville, NC 27858 USA
来源
HEALTH PHYSICS | 2014年 / 106卷 / 04期
关键词
cancer; dose; organ; radiation protection; radiation risk; CT; HEIGHT;
D O I
10.1097/HP.0b013e3182a829cb
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Current methods of evaluating radiation-induced cancer risk depend on the organ dose but not explicitly on extensive quantities such as the organ mass. However, at the same organ dose, one may expect the larger number of cells in a larger organ to lead to a higher cancer risk. Here the author introduces organ- and radiation type-specific cell cancer risk coefficients and obtains analytical relations between cancer risk and the radiation environment, which contains the dependence of cancer risk on organ masses. The excess cancer risk induced by low dose radiation for an organ is shown to be directly proportional to the organ mass. Therefore the total excess risk for all solid cancers depends directly on organ masses and consequently on body weight or size. This method is also being compared with three existing methods of evaluating the radiation-induced cancer risk, and special cases where this formulation matches each method are demonstrated. The results suggest that the direct dependence of cancer risk on organ masses needs to be checked against existing epidemiological data and, if verified, should be included in the methodology for the evaluation of radiation-induced cancer risk, in particular the individual risk. This dependence is also expected to affect the cancer risk transport from one population group to another that is different in organ mass, body weight or height.
引用
收藏
页码:459 / 465
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] EXTRAPOLATING RADIATION-INDUCED CANCER RISKS FROM LOW DOSES TO VERY LOW DOSES
    Brenner, David J.
    HEALTH PHYSICS, 2009, 97 (05): : 505 - 509
  • [32] Radiation-induced cancer risk from annual computed tomography for patients with cystic fibrosis
    de Gonzalez, Amy Berrington
    Kim, Kwang Pyo
    Samet, Jonathan M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2007, 176 (10) : 970 - 973
  • [33] Should we discount low-dose radiation risk?
    Peckover, R
    Priest, ND
    NUCLEAR ENERGY-JOURNAL OF THE BRITISH NUCLEAR ENERGY SOCIETY, 2004, 43 (03): : 145 - 152
  • [34] State of the art in research into the risk of low dose radiation exposure
    Nikjoo, Hooshang
    Sankaranarayanan, Krishnaswami
    JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION, 2014, 34 (01) : 253 - 258
  • [36] Reducing the Breast Cancer Risk and Radiation Dose of Radiography for Scoliosis in Children: A Phantom Study
    Nemoto, Manami
    Chida, Koichi
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2020, 10 (10)
  • [37] Breast radiation dose equivalent and cancer risk estimation during PET/ CT examinations
    Jambi, Layal
    Alkhorayef, Mohammed
    Almuwanis, Mohammed
    Sulieman, Abdelmoneim
    RADIATION PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY, 2024, 215
  • [38] Vanishing by Design of Cancer Risk Uncertainty for Low Radiation Doses Is Misleading and Unscientific
    Scott, Bobby R.
    DOSE-RESPONSE, 2022, 20 (01):
  • [39] Radiation Dose Management: Part 2, Estimating Fetal Radiation Risk From CT During Pregnancy
    Goldberg-Stein, Shlomit A.
    Liu, Bob
    Hahn, Peter F.
    Lee, Susanna I.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2012, 198 (04) : W352 - W356
  • [40] Incidence Cancer Risk From the Radiation Treatment for Acoustic Neuroma Patient
    Kim, D.
    Chung, W.
    Shin, D.
    Yoon, M.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2014, 41 (06) : 271 - +