MRI Volumetric Analysis of Breast Fibroglandular Tissue to Assess Risk of the Spared Nipple in BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carriers

被引:17
作者
Baltzer, Heather L. [1 ]
Alonzo-Proulx, Olivier [2 ,3 ]
Mainprize, James G. [2 ]
Yaffe, Martin J. [2 ,3 ]
Metcalfe, Kelly A. [4 ,5 ]
Narod, Steve A. [4 ]
Warner, Ellen [2 ,6 ]
Semple, John L. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Div Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Sunnybrook Res Inst, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Dept Med Biophys, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Womens Coll Res Inst, Toronto, ON, Canada
[5] Univ Toronto, Lawrence S Bloomberg Fac Nursing, Toronto, ON, Canada
[6] Sunnybrook Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Med, Div Med Oncol, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada
关键词
AREOLA-SPARING MASTECTOMY; BILATERAL PROPHYLACTIC MASTECTOMY; TECHNICAL CONSIDERATIONS; FAMILY-HISTORY; CANCER; RECONSTRUCTION; WOMEN; SKIN; SATISFACTION; EFFICACY;
D O I
10.1245/s10434-014-3532-x
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Prophylactic nipple-areolar complex (NAC)-sparing mastectomy (NSM) in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers is controversial over concern regarding residual fibroglandular tissue (FGT) with malignant potential. The objective of this study was to model the volume of FGT in the NAC at a standard retroareolar margin (5 mm) and examine the change in this amount with a greater retroareolar margin or areola-sparing technique. A segmentation protocol was applied to breast MRIs from 105 BRCA1/2 patients to quantify volumes of FGT for total breast and NAC. The proportion of FGT in the NAC relative to the breast was calculated as the primary outcome and was compared for 5 mm versus 10 mm retroareolar depths. The proportion of FGT in the areola was compared with the NAC. At 5 mm retroareolar thickness, residual NAC FGT comprised 1.3 % of the total breast FGT. This amount was not significantly greater than the proportion in the areola (p = 0.3, d = 0.1). Increasing the retroareolar thickness to 10 mm led to a statistically and possibly clinically significant increase in the amount of NAC FGT (p < 0.001, d = 1.1). The proportion of FGT remaining in the spared NAC with a 5 mm margin is extremely small, suggesting that leaving the entire NAC would create very little added risk. Doubling the retroareolar margin may translate into a clinically meaningful increase. Overall, our findings support the safety of the current trend toward increased rates of prophylactic NSM performed in this high-risk population.
引用
收藏
页码:1583 / 1588
页数:6
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [1] Nipple sparing mastectomy: Can we predict the factors predisposing to necrosis?
    Algaithy, Z. K.
    Petit, J. Y.
    Lohsiriwat, V.
    Maisonneuve, P.
    Rey, P. C.
    Baros, N.
    Lai, H.
    Mulas, P.
    Barbalho, D. M.
    Veronesi, P.
    Rietjens, M.
    [J]. EJSO, 2012, 38 (02): : 125 - 129
  • [2] Average risks of breast and ovarian cancer associated with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations detected in case series unselected for family history:: A combined analysis of 22 studies
    Antoniou, A
    Pharoah, PDP
    Narod, S
    Risch, HA
    Eyfjord, JE
    Hopper, JL
    Loman, N
    Olsson, H
    Johannsson, O
    Borg, Å
    Pasini, B
    Radice, P
    Manoukian, S
    Eccles, DM
    Tang, N
    Olah, E
    Anton-Culver, H
    Warner, E
    Lubinski, J
    Gronwald, J
    Gorski, B
    Tulinius, H
    Thorlacius, S
    Eerola, H
    Nevanlinna, H
    Syrjäkoski, K
    Kallioniemi, OP
    Thompson, D
    Evans, C
    Peto, J
    Lalloo, F
    Evans, DG
    Easton, DF
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2003, 72 (05) : 1117 - 1130
  • [3] Skin-sparing mastectomy - Oncologic and reconstructive considerations
    Carlson, GW
    Bostwick, J
    Styblo, TM
    Moore, B
    Bried, JT
    Murray, DR
    Wood, WC
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1997, 225 (05) : 570 - 575
  • [4] Carlson GW, 1997, ANN SURG, V225, P575
  • [5] Meta-analysis of BRCA1 and BRCA2 penetrance
    Chen, Sining
    Parmigiani, Giovanni
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2007, 25 (11) : 1329 - 1333
  • [6] Immediate nipple reconstruction utilizing the DIEP flap in areola-sparing mastectomy
    Craig, E. Stirling
    Walker, Marc E.
    Salomon, Jeffrey
    Fusi, Stefano
    [J]. MICROSURGERY, 2013, 33 (02) : 125 - 129
  • [7] Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy for Breast Cancer and Risk-Reducing Surgery: The Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center Experience
    de Alcantara Filho, Paulo
    Capko, Deborah
    Barry, John Mitchel
    Morrow, Monica
    Pusic, Andrea
    Sacchini, Virgilio S.
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 18 (11) : 3117 - 3122
  • [8] Why do women accept to undergo a nipple sparing mastectomy or to reconstruct the nipple areola complex when nipple sparing mastectomy is not possible?
    Didier, F.
    Arnaboldi, P.
    Gandini, S.
    Maldifassi, A.
    Goldhirsch, A.
    Radice, D.
    Minotti, I.
    Ballardini, B.
    Luini, A.
    Santillo, B.
    Rietjens, M.
    Petit, J. Y.
    [J]. BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2012, 132 (03) : 1177 - 1184
  • [9] Does nipple preservation in mastectomy improve satisfaction with cosmetic results, psychological adjustment, body image and sexuality?
    Didier, F.
    Radice, D.
    Gandini, S.
    Bedolis, R.
    Rotmensz, N.
    Maldifassi, A.
    Santillo, B.
    Luini, A.
    Galimberti, V.
    Scaffidi, E.
    Lupo, F.
    Martella, S.
    Petit, J. Y.
    [J]. BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2009, 118 (03) : 623 - 633
  • [10] Patient Satisfaction following Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Immediate Breast Reconstruction: An 8-Year Outcome Study
    Djohan, Risal
    Gage, Earl
    Gatherwright, James
    Pavri, Sabrina
    Firouz, Jimmy
    Bernard, Steven
    Yetman, Randall
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2010, 125 (03) : 818 - 829