Weight as an Embodiment of Importance

被引:234
作者
Jostmann, Nils B. [1 ]
Lakens, Daniel [2 ]
Schubert, Thomas W. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Lisbon, Portugal
[2] Univ Utrecht, Lisbon, Portugal
[3] Inst Super Ciencias Trabalho & Empresa, Lisbon, Portugal
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02426.x
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Four studies show that the abstract concept of importance is grounded in bodily experiences of weight. Participants provided judgments of importance while they held either a heavy or a light clipboard. Holding a heavy clipboard increased judgments of monetary value (Study 1) and made participants consider fair decision-making procedures to be more important (Study 2). It also caused more elaborate thinking, as indicated by higher consistency between related judgments (Study 3) and by greater polarization of agreement ratings for strong versus weak arguments (Study 4). In line with an embodied perspective on cognition, these findings suggest that, much as weight makes people invest more physical effort in dealing with concrete objects, it also makes people invest more cognitive effort in dealing with abstract issues.
引用
收藏
页码:1169 / 1174
页数:6
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2003, Metaphors We Live By
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1967, MEASUREMENT MEANING
  • [3] Grounded cognition
    Barsalou, Lawrence W.
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 59 : 617 - 645
  • [4] The roles of body and mind in abstract thought
    Boroditsky, L
    Ramscar, M
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2002, 13 (02) : 185 - 189
  • [5] Briñol P, 2008, EMBODIED GROUNDING: SOCIAL, COGNITIVE, AFFECTIVE, AND NEUROSCIENTIFIC APPROACHES, P184
  • [6] Chaiken S., 1995, ATTITUDE STRENGTH AN, P387, DOI DOI 10.4324/9781315807041
  • [7] Clark H.H., 1973, COGNITIVE DEV ACQUIS, P27, DOI [10.1016/B978-0-12-505850-6.50008-6, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-505850-6.50008-6]
  • [8] Gibson James J., 1979, ECOLOGICAL APPROACH
  • [9] Petty RE, 1999, DUAL-PROCESS THEORIES IN SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, P41
  • [10] Embodied Perception and the Economy of Action
    Proffitt, Dennis R.
    [J]. PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2006, 1 (02) : 110 - 122