How many came home? Evaluating ex situ conservation of green turtles in the Cayman Islands

被引:25
作者
Barbanti, Anna [1 ,2 ]
Martin, Clara [1 ,2 ]
Blumenthal, Janice M. [3 ]
Boyle, Jack [3 ]
Broderick, Annette C. [4 ]
Collyer, Lucy [3 ]
Ebanks-Petrie, Gina [3 ]
Godley, Brendan J. [4 ]
Mustin, Walter [5 ]
Ordonez, Victor [1 ,2 ]
Pascual, Marta [1 ,2 ]
Carreras, Carlos [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Barcelona, Dept Genet Microbiol & Stat, Barcelona, Spain
[2] Univ Barcelona, IRBio, Barcelona, Spain
[3] Dept Environm, Grand Cayman, Cayman Islands
[4] Univ Exeter, Ctr Ecol & Conservat, Penryn, England
[5] Cayman Turtle Ctr, West Bay, Cayman Islands
关键词
Chelonia mydas; ex situ conservation; microsatellites; mtDNA; parentage analysis; CHELONIA-MYDAS POPULATIONS; CAPTIVE BREEDING PROGRAMS; MITOCHONDRIAL-DNA; BIODIVERSITY LOSS; GENETIC DIVERSITY; LIFE-HISTORY; SEA-TURTLE; REINTRODUCTION; PHYLOGEOGRAPHY; EXTINCTION;
D O I
10.1111/mec.15017
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Ex situ management is an important conservation tool that allows the preservation of biological diversity outside natural habitats while supporting survival in the wild. Captive breeding followed by re-introduction is a possible approach for endangered species conservation and preservation of genetic variability. The Cayman Turtle Centre Ltd was established in 1968 to market green turtle (Chelonia mydas) meat and other products and replenish wild populations, thought to be locally extirpated, through captive breeding. We evaluated the effects of this re-introduction programmme using molecular markers (13 microsatellites, 800-bp D-loop and simple tandem repeat mitochondrial DNA sequences) from captive breeders (N = 257) and wild nesting females (N = 57) (sampling period: 2013-2015). We divided the captive breeders into three groups: founders (from the original stock), and then two subdivisions of F1 individuals corresponding to two different management strategies, cohort 1995 ("C1995") and multicohort F1 ("MCF1"). Loss of genetic variability and increased relatedness was observed in the captive stock over time. We found no significant differences in diversity among captive and wild groups, and similar or higher levels of haplotype variability when compared to other natural populations. Using parentage and sibship assignment, we determined that 90% of the wild individuals were related to the captive stock. Our results suggest a strong impact of the re-introduction programmme on the present recovery of the wild green turtle population nesting in the Cayman Islands. Moreover, genetic relatedness analyses of captive populations are necessary to improve future management actions to maintain genetic diversity in the long term and avoid inbreeding depression.
引用
收藏
页码:1637 / 1651
页数:15
相关论文
共 112 条
  • [91] THE NEIGHBOR-JOINING METHOD - A NEW METHOD FOR RECONSTRUCTING PHYLOGENETIC TREES
    SAITOU, N
    NEI, M
    [J]. MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 1987, 4 (04) : 406 - 425
  • [92] Successful reintroduction of captive-raised Yellow-shouldered Amazon parrots on Margarita Island, Venezuela
    Sanz, V
    Grajal, A
    [J]. CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 1998, 12 (02) : 430 - 441
  • [93] Reintroduction: Challenges and lessons for basic ecology
    Sarrazin, F
    Barbault, R
    [J]. TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 1996, 11 (11) : 474 - 478
  • [94] Seminoff J. A., 2004, CHELONIA MYDAS
  • [95] Deeper Mitochondrial Sequencing Reveals Cryptic Diversity and Structure in Brazilian Green Turtle Rookeries
    Shamblin, Brian M.
    Dutton, Peter H.
    Bjorndal, Karen A.
    Bolten, Alan B.
    Naro-Maciel, Eugenia
    Barsante Santos, Armando Jose
    Bellini, Claudio
    Baptistotte, Cecilia
    Marcovaldi, Maria Angela
    Nairn, Campbell J.
    [J]. CHELONIAN CONSERVATION AND BIOLOGY, 2015, 14 (02) : 167 - 172
  • [96] Genetic structure of Florida green turtle rookeries as indicated by mitochondrial DNA control region sequences
    Shamblin, Brian M.
    Bagley, Dean A.
    Ehrhart, Llewellyn M.
    Desjardin, Nicole A.
    Martin, R. Erik
    Hart, Kristen M.
    Naro-Maciel, Eugenia
    Rusenko, Kirt
    Stiner, John C.
    Sobel, Debra
    Johnson, Chris
    Wilmers, Thomas J.
    Wright, Laura J.
    Nairn, Campbell J.
    [J]. CONSERVATION GENETICS, 2015, 16 (03) : 673 - 685
  • [97] Efficient, Noninvasive Genetic Sampling for Monitoring Reintroduced Wolves
    Stenglein, Jennifer L.
    Waits, Lisette P.
    Ausband, David E.
    Zager, Peter
    Mack, Curt M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 2010, 74 (05) : 1050 - 1058
  • [98] Stoddart D.R., 1980, Atoll Research Bulletin, V241, P171, DOI DOI 10.5479/SI.00775630.241-16.171
  • [99] Gene flow and endangered species translocations: a topic revisited
    Storfer, A
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 1999, 87 (02) : 173 - 180
  • [100] Standards for documenting and monitoring bird reintroduction projects
    Sutherland, William J.
    Armstrong, Doug
    Butchart, Stuart H. M.
    Earnhardt, Joanne M.
    Ewen, John
    Jamieson, Ian
    Jones, Carl G.
    Lee, Rebecca
    Newbery, Peter
    Nichols, James D.
    Parker, Kevin A.
    Sarrazin, Francois
    Seddon, Philip J.
    Shah, Nirmal
    Tatayah, Vikash
    [J]. CONSERVATION LETTERS, 2010, 3 (04): : 229 - 235