Clinical Evaluation of Bone Strength and Fracture Risk

被引:41
|
作者
de Bakker, Chantal M. J. [1 ]
Tseng, Wei-Ju [1 ]
Li, Yihan [1 ]
Zhao, Hongbo [1 ]
Liu, X. Sherry [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Dept Orthopaed Surg, McKay Orthopaed Res Lab, Perelman Sch Med, 426C Stemmler Hall,36th St & HamiltonWalk, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
来源
CURRENT OSTEOPOROSIS REPORTS | 2017年 / 15卷 / 01期
关键词
Bone strength; Fracture; Osteoporosis; Finite element analysis; Clinical imaging; Bonemicrostructure; Bone material properties; QUANTITATIVE COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; FINITE-ELEMENT-ANALYSIS; REFERENCE POINT INDENTATION; IN-VIVO ASSESSMENT; MINERAL DENSITY CHANGES; HUMAN CORTICAL BONE; DISTAL TIBIAL BONE; TRABECULAR BONE; PROXIMAL FEMUR; MECHANICAL-PROPERTIES;
D O I
10.1007/s11914-017-0346-3
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose of Review This paper seeks to evaluate and compare recent advances in the clinical assessment of the changes in bone mechanical properties that take place as a result of osteoporosis and other metabolic bone diseases and their treatments. Recent Findings In addition to the standard of DXA-based areal bone mineral density (aBMD), a variety of methods, including imaging-based structural measurements, finite element analysis (FEA)-based techniques, and alternate methods including ultrasound, bone biopsy, reference point indentation, and statistical shape and density modeling, have been developed which allow for reliable prediction of bone strength and fracture risk. These methods have also shown promise in the evaluation of treatment-induced changes in bone mechanical properties. Summary Continued technological advances allowing for increasingly high-resolution imaging with low radiation dose, together with the expanding adoption of DXA-based predictions of bone structure and mechanics, as well as the increasing awareness of the importance of bone material properties in determining whole-bone mechanics, lead us to anticipate substantial future advances in this field.
引用
收藏
页码:32 / 42
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Clinical Evaluation of Bone Strength and Fracture Risk
    Chantal M. J. de Bakker
    Wei-Ju Tseng
    Yihan Li
    Hongbo Zhao
    X. Sherry Liu
    Current Osteoporosis Reports, 2017, 15 : 32 - 42
  • [2] Response to "Clinical Evaluation of Bone Strength and Fracture Risk"
    Loucks, Anne B.
    Clark, Brian C.
    Bowman, Lyn
    CURRENT OSTEOPOROSIS REPORTS, 2017, 15 (04): : 396 - 397
  • [3] Response to “Clinical Evaluation of Bone Strength and Fracture Risk”
    Anne B. Loucks
    Brian C. Clark
    Lyn Bowman
    Current Osteoporosis Reports, 2017, 15 : 396 - 397
  • [4] Response to Loucks et al.'s Comment on "Clinical Evaluation of Bone Strength and Fracture Risk"
    Liu, X. Sherry
    de Bakker, Chantal M. J.
    Tseng, Wei-Ju
    Li, Yihan
    Zhao, Hongbo
    CURRENT OSTEOPOROSIS REPORTS, 2017, 15 (04): : 398 - 398
  • [5] Response to Loucks et al.’s Comment on “Clinical Evaluation of Bone Strength and Fracture Risk”
    X. Sherry Liu
    Chantal M. J. de Bakker
    Wei-Ju Tseng
    Yihan Li
    Hongbo Zhao
    Current Osteoporosis Reports, 2017, 15 : 398 - 398
  • [6] ROLE OF BONE STRENGTH IN THE ASSESSMENT OF FRACTURE RISK
    Thomas, T.
    OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 31 (SUPPL 1) : S62 - S62
  • [7] FRACTURE RISK REDUCTION IN OSTEOPOROSIS: A MATTER OF BONE QUALITY AND BONE STRENGTH
    Fonseca, J. E.
    OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 22 : S756 - S756
  • [8] CONTRIBUTION OF BONE ARCHITECTURE TO FRACTURE RISK EVALUATION
    Cappelle, S.
    Peretz, A.
    Karmali, R.
    Rozenberg, S.
    Muhire, C.
    Moreau, M.
    Paesmans, M.
    Bergmann, P.
    Body, J. J.
    OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 25 : S273 - S274
  • [9] Chemotherapy decreases epiphyseal strength and increases bone fracture risk
    Van Leeuwen, BL
    Verkerke, GJ
    Hartel, RM
    Sluiter, WJ
    Kamps, WA
    Jansen, HWB
    Hoekstra, HJ
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2003, (413) : 243 - 254
  • [10] Osteoporosis in clinical practice - Bone densitometry and fracture risk
    Davey, DA
    SOUTH AFRICAN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1998, 88 (11): : 1419 - 1423