Exploring product and service innovation similarities and differences

被引:251
作者
Nijssen, Edwin J.
Hillebrand, Bas
Vermeulen, Patrick A. M.
Kemp, Ron G. M.
机构
[1] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Sch Management, NL-6500 HK Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Tilburg Univ, NL-5000 LE Tilburg, Netherlands
[3] EIM Small Business Res & Consultancy, Zoetermeer, Netherlands
[4] Univ Wageningen & Res Ctr, NL-6700 HB Wageningen, Netherlands
关键词
innovation; new product development; new service development; cannibalization; SMEs;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijresmar.2006.02.001
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper aims to provide an initial step towards a synthesis of new service and new product development research. Using a baseline model of innovation, applicable to innovation in general, we hypothesize differential context effects between new service and product development in order to better understand their differences and similarities. We argue that R&D strength is more important for new product than service development, while a company's willingness to cannibalize organizational routines and prior investments is more important in the case of new service than new product development. The model and hypotheses are tested using data from 217 service-based and 105 product-based companies in The Netherlands. The results provide initial support for the integrating perspective. Directions for future research are discussed. (c) 2006 Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:241 / 251
页数:11
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]   Postindustrial technology policy [J].
Alic, JA .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2001, 30 (06) :873-889
[2]   Differential potency of factors affecting innovation performance in manufacturing and services firms in Australia [J].
AtuaheneGima, K .
JOURNAL OF PRODUCT INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, 1996, 13 (01) :35-52
[3]   An empirically-based typology of product innovativeness for new financial services: Success and failure scenarios [J].
Avlonitis, GJ ;
Papastathopoulou, PG ;
Gounaris, SP .
JOURNAL OF PRODUCT INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, 2001, 18 (05) :324-342
[4]   TOWARDS A THEORY OF INNOVATION IN SERVICES [J].
BARRAS, R .
RESEARCH POLICY, 1986, 15 (04) :161-173
[5]   Firm size, small business presence and sales of innovative products: A micro-econometric analysis [J].
Brouwer, E ;
Kleinknecht, A .
SMALL BUSINESS ECONOMICS, 1996, 8 (03) :189-201
[6]   PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT - PAST RESEARCH, PRESENT FINDINGS, AND FUTURE-DIRECTIONS [J].
BROWN, SL ;
EISENHARDT, KM .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1995, 20 (02) :343-378
[7]   Market motives, distinctive capabilities, and domestic inertia: A hybrid model of innovation generation [J].
Chandrashekaran, M ;
Mehta, R ;
Chandrashekaran, R ;
Grewal, R .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1999, 36 (01) :95-112
[8]   Organizing for radical product innovation: The overlooked role of willingness to cannibalize [J].
Chandy, RK ;
Tellis, GJ .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1998, 35 (04) :474-487
[9]  
Coombs R, 2000, ECON SCI TECHN INNOV, V18, P85
[10]   THE IMPACT OF NEW PRODUCT STRATEGIES [J].
COOPER, RG .
INDUSTRIAL MARKETING MANAGEMENT, 1983, 12 (04) :243-256