Translation and validation of the Chinese version of medical maximizer-minimizer scale: a cross-sectional study

被引:3
作者
Lai, Fenghua [1 ]
Pei, Ling [1 ]
Yue, Shufan [1 ]
Cao, Xiaopei [1 ]
Xiao, Haipeng [1 ]
Li, Yanbing [1 ]
Li, Jin [2 ]
机构
[1] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Endocrinol, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Geriatr, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2021年 / 11卷 / 01期
关键词
health informatics; quality in health care; primary care; HEALTH; CANCER; CARE; SERVICES; INCOME;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042432
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective Medical overutilisation and underutilisation affect optimal healthcare. The Medical Maximizer-Minimizer Scale (MMS) was developed to assess individual medical maximising and minimising tendencies. Despite significant improvement in the healthcare system over the past four decades, no psychometric scales to examine treatment maximising and minimising preferences are available in China. This study aimed to translate the MMS into Chinese and examine its reliability and validity in a Chinese population. Design This cross-sectional study was conducted in December 2019 through an online survey panel. Methods The MMS was translated into a Chinese version (CN-MMS) using a forward-backward translation procedure. Next, a random online survey of the general population in China was conducted. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis were performed to examine the underlying factor structure of the CN-MMS. The internal consistency reliability of the scale was determined using Cronbach's alpha coefficient and corrected item-total correlation. A multivariate linear regression analysis was used to examine associations between medical maximising and minimising preferences and demographic variables in the Chinese population. Results This study included 984 participants aged 18-80 years. The CN-MMS retained 10 items, and the EFA supported a two-factor structure. The model fit for this two-factor structure of the CN-MMS was acceptable with chi(2)/df=3.7, comparative fit index=0.958, goodness-of-fit index=0.951, Tucker-Lewis Index=0.944 and root mean square error of approximation=0.074. The scale had a Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.864, corrected item-total correlation of 0.451-0.667, and test-retest reliability of 0.815. Significant predictors of CN-MMS total score were nationality and household monthly income. Conclusions The CN-MMS showed satisfactory psychometric properties. Therefore, it can be used to investigate the individual medical maximising and minimising tendencies among the general Chinese population.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] Patient online self-reporting of toxicity symptoms during chemotherapy
    Basch, E
    Artz, D
    Dulko, D
    Scher, K
    Sabbatini, P
    Hensley, M
    Mitra, N
    Speakman, J
    McCabe, M
    Schrag, D
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2005, 23 (15) : 3552 - 3561
  • [2] Population health in an era of rising income inequality: USA, 1980-2015
    Bor, Jacob
    Cohen, Gregory H.
    Galea, Sandro
    [J]. LANCET, 2017, 389 (10077) : 1475 - 1490
  • [3] A comprehensive method for the translation and cross-cultural validation of health status questionnaires
    Eremenco, SL
    Cella, D
    Arnold, BJ
    [J]. EVALUATION & THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS, 2005, 28 (02) : 212 - 232
  • [4] Role of Patient Maximizing-Minimizing Preferences in Thyroid Cancer Surveillance
    Evron, Joshua M.
    Reyes-Gastelum, David
    Banerjee, Mousumi
    Scherer, Laura D.
    Wallner, Lauren P.
    Hamilton, Ann S.
    Ward, Kevin C.
    Hawley, Sarah T.
    Zikmund-Fisher, Brian J.
    Haymart, Megan R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 37 (32) : 3042 - +
  • [5] Translation of the Chinese Version of the Nomophobia Questionnaire and Its Validation Among College Students: Factor Analysis
    Gao, Ye
    Dai, Hongliang
    Jia, Guizhi
    Liang, Chunguang
    Tong, Tong
    Zhang, Zhiyu
    Song, Ruobing
    Wang, Qing
    Zhu, Yue
    [J]. JMIR MHEALTH AND UHEALTH, 2020, 8 (03):
  • [6] Graham JL, 2003, HARVARD BUS REV, V81, P82
  • [7] Groopman J., 2011, Your medical mind, How to decide what is right for you
  • [8] Screening for Prostate Cancer US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement
    Grossman, David C.
    Curry, Susan J.
    Owens, Douglas K.
    Bibbins-Domingo, Kirsten
    Caughey, Aaron B.
    Davidson, Karina W.
    Doubeni, Chyke A.
    Ebel, Mark
    Epling, John W., Jr.
    Kemper, Alex R.
    Krist, Alex H.
    Kubik, Martha
    Landefeld, C. Seth
    Mangione, Carol M.
    Silverstein, Michael
    Simon, Melissa A.
    Siu, Albert L.
    Tseng, Chien-Wen
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2018, 319 (18): : 1901 - 1913
  • [9] Access to healthcare services makes a difference in healthy longevity among older Chinese adults
    Gu, Danan
    Zhang, Zhenmei
    Zeng, Yi
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2009, 68 (02) : 210 - 219
  • [10] Inequality in the health services utilization in rural and urban china A horizontal inequality analysis
    Guo, Bin
    Xie, Xin
    Wu, Qunhong
    Zhang, Xin
    Cheng, Huaizhi
    Tao, Sihai
    Quan, Hude
    [J]. MEDICINE, 2020, 99 (02)