Negative selection algorithm based methodology for online structural health monitoring

被引:9
|
作者
Barontini, Alberto [1 ]
Masciotta, Maria Giovanna [2 ]
Amado-Mendes, Paulo [3 ]
Ramos, Luis F. [1 ]
Lourenco, Paulo B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Minho Guimaraes, Dept Civil Engn, ISISE, Portugal Campus Azurem, P-4800058 Guimaraes, Portugal
[2] Univ G dAnnunzio, Dept Engn & Geol, Viale Pindaro 42, Pescara, Italy
[3] Univ Coimbra, ISISE, Dept Civil Engn Coimbra, Portugal R Luis Reis Santos,Polo II, P-3030788 Coimbra, Portugal
关键词
Negative Selection Algorithm; Masonry Arch; Damage Detection; Structural Health Monitoring; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE; DAMAGE DETECTION; OPTIMIZATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111662
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Even small damages in engineered systems can endanger the users or lead to significant economic costs. The detection of damage existence is only the first task within the Damage Identification strategy, nonetheless, it is still very complex, especially for Civil Engineering products. The present study is devoted to the analysis of a global methodology for damage detection based on a recently developed version of the Negative Selection Algorithm (NSA). Given any new monitored data measured from the system, the methodology addresses the one-class classification problem by labelling it as normal or abnormal, thus potentially damaged. The strategy is independent of the engineered system under investigation and of the damage-sensitive features used to assess the state, as long as only two features per time are analysed by the classifier. The methodology includes a set of features meant to tackle typical shortcomings and open issues which might prevent an effective application of NSA to damage detection. Some of them are shared with other soft computing techniques for classifications. Finally, the methodology is applied to the data collected from a scaled masonry arch built and tested at the University of Minho (Portugal). The datasets are used to validate the algorithm features, to compare the NSA with other well-known classification algorithms and to simulate a real monitoring to assess the readiness of the algorithm response.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Optimal Structural Health Monitoring Feature Selection via Minimized Performance Uncertainty
    Mao, Zhu
    Todd, Michael D.
    STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING: RESEARCH AND APPLICATIONS, 2013, 558 : 235 - +
  • [22] Structural health monitoring based on the hybrid ant colony algorithm by using Hooke-Jeeves pattern search
    Shakya, Abhishek
    Mishra, Mayank
    Maity, Damodar
    Santarsiero, Giuseppe
    SN APPLIED SCIENCES, 2019, 1 (07):
  • [23] A crowdsourcing-based methodology using smartphones for bridge health monitoring
    Mei, Qipei
    Gul, Mustafa
    STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2019, 18 (5-6): : 1602 - 1619
  • [24] An unsupervised structural health monitoring framework based on Variational Autoencoders and Hidden Markov Models
    Coraca, Eduardo M.
    Ferreira, Janito, V
    Nobrega, Euripedes G. O.
    RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2023, 231
  • [25] Sensor Placement Optimization in Structural Health Monitoring Using Niching Monkey Algorithm
    Yi, Ting-Hua
    Li, Hong-Nan
    Gu, Ming
    Zhang, Xu-Dong
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL STABILITY AND DYNAMICS, 2014, 14 (05)
  • [26] A new methodology for Structural Health Monitoring applications
    de Medeiros, Ricardo
    Lopes, Hernani M. R.
    Guedes, Rui M.
    Vaz, Mario A. P.
    Vandepitte, Dirk
    Tita, Volnei
    ICSI 2015 THE 1ST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY FUNCHAL, 2015, 114 : 54 - 61
  • [27] Structural health monitoring by using a sparse coding-based deep learning algorithm with wireless sensor networks
    Guo, Junqi
    Xie, Xiaobo
    Bie, Rongfang
    Sun, Limin
    PERSONAL AND UBIQUITOUS COMPUTING, 2014, 18 (08) : 1977 - 1987
  • [28] A Bayesian-based data fusion methodology and its application for seismic structural health monitoring of the Consoli Palace in Gubbio, Italy
    Ierimonti, Laura
    Venanzi, Ilaria
    Cavalagli, Nicola
    Garcia-Macias, Enrique
    Ubertini, Filippo
    XIX ANIDIS CONFERENCE, SEISMIC ENGINEERING IN ITALY, 2023, 44 : 2082 - 2089
  • [29] New Bayesian model updating algorithm applied to a structural health monitoring benchmark
    Ching, JY
    Beck, JL
    STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2004, 3 (04): : 313 - 332
  • [30] Defect classification in sparsity-based structural health monitoring
    Golato, Andrew
    Ahmad, Fauzia
    Santhanam, Sridhar
    Amin, Moeness G.
    COMPRESSIVE SENSING VI: FROM DIVERSE MODALITIES TO BIG DATA ANALYTICS, 2017, 10211