Integrating case-based and fuzzy reasoning to qualitatively predict risk in an environmental impact assessment review

被引:39
作者
Liu, Kevin Fong-Rey [1 ]
Yu, Chih-Wei [2 ]
机构
[1] Ming Chi Univ Technol, Dept Safety Hlth & Environm Engn, Taipei 24301, Taiwan
[2] Da Yeh Univ, Dept Environm Engn, Changhua 51591, Taiwan
关键词
Environmental impact assessment; Case-based reasoning; Fuzzy reasoning; Importance-performance analysis; Risk prediction; Risk management; DECISION-SUPPORT; LOGIC; SYSTEM; SUSTAINABILITY; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.envsoft.2009.04.005
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
During the preparation of environmental impact statements (EIS) and environmental impact assessment reports (EIAR) for a development proposal, developers have three concerns. First is acquiring similar proposals for reference. Second is to forecast a possible review result for a compiled EIS or EIAR: approval, conditional approval, second-stage EIA, or disapproval. Risk management in accordance with the possible review result is the third issue. With the predicted possible review result, early preparation and revision of environmental management plans can ameliorate in advance highly risky nuisances: thereby the probability of passing review is relatively enhanced. In response to the first concern, Taiwan EPA provides developers an information system to access EISs and EIARs through the Internet. Except that, there is no related system to address these concerns in Taiwan. In this paper, the following suggestions of using artificial intelligence and management science are proposed to assist developers: case-based reasoning (CBR) for retrieval of similar cases, fuzzy reasoning (FR) for qualitative risk forecast, and importance-performance analysis (IPA) for risk management. Finally, a case study is used to demonstrate the use of the proposed system. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1241 / 1251
页数:11
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   Evaluating strategies for sustainable development: fuzzy logic reasoning and sensitivity analysis [J].
Andriantiatsaholiniaina, LA ;
Kouikoglou, VS ;
Phillis, YA .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2004, 48 (02) :149-172
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1999, Handbook of Environmental Impact Assessment
[3]   Application of the self-organizing mapping in exploration of the environmental impact of a tsunami disaster [J].
Astel, Aleksander ;
Boszke, Leonard ;
Niedzielski, Przemyslaw ;
Kozak, Lidia .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND HEALTH PART A-TOXIC/HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES & ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2008, 43 (09) :1016-1026
[4]  
Borri D., 1998, Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, V22, P299, DOI 10.1016/S0198-9715(98)00045-3
[5]   Risk assessment modelling of microbiology-related solids separation problems in activated sludge systems [J].
Comas, J. ;
Rodriguez-Roda, I. ;
Gernaey, K. V. ;
Rosen, C. ;
Jeppsson, U. ;
Poch, M. .
ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2008, 23 (10-11) :1250-1261
[6]   A knowledge-based model of watershed assessment for sediment [J].
Dai, JJ ;
Lorenzato, S ;
Rocke, DM .
ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2004, 19 (04) :423-433
[7]   A decision support method for environmental impact assessment using a fuzzy logic approach [J].
De Siqueira Campos Boclin, Andr ;
de Mello, Renato .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2006, 58 (01) :170-181
[8]   Fuzzy expert systems and GIS for cholera health risk prediction in southern Africa [J].
Fleming, Gavin ;
van der Merwe, Mama ;
McFerren, Graeme .
ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2007, 22 (04) :442-448
[9]   A fuzzy logic approach for the impact assessment in LCA [J].
González, B ;
Adenso-Díaz, B ;
González-Torre, PL .
RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2002, 37 (01) :61-79
[10]  
GRAHAM W, 2007, ENVIRON PLANN, V39, P810