Adaptivity of wayfinding strategies in a multi-building ensemble: The effects of spatial structure, task requirements, and metric information

被引:58
作者
Hoelscher, Christoph [1 ]
Buechner, Simon J. [1 ]
Meilinger, Tobias [1 ,2 ]
Strube, Gerhard [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Freiburg, Ctr Cognit Sci, D-79098 Freiburg, Germany
[2] Max Planck Inst Biol Cybernet, Tubingen, Germany
关键词
Cognition; Architecture; Wayfinding strategies; Adaptivity; Representation; ORIENTATION; KNOWLEDGE; NAVIGATION; ROUTE; MAPS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.05.010
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This study investigates the adaptivity of wayfinding strategies in a real-world setting of a multi-building ensemble. Familiarity with the environment, map usage and verbal vs. visual task instructions were systematically varied. Measures included path choices, wayfinding performance and information usage. Thirty-two participants had to find eight goals in a multi-level building ensemble consisting of two distinctive building parts. It was tested whether the standard wall-mounted floor maps found in the majority of public buildings can help navigation in a complex unknown environment. Unfamiliar users tried to make use of these plans more frequently, but were not able to compensate for spatial knowledge deficits compared to participants familiar with the setting, Two strategies of multi-level wayfinding were compared with respect to a region-based hierarchical planning approach. Strategy selection could be shown to be highly adaptive to spatial properties of the environment as well as characteristics of the task instruction, i.e., spatial precision of target information. Overall, the strategy of moving horizontally into the target building prior to vertical travel was shown to be more effective in this multi-building setting. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:208 / 219
页数:12
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
BROSAMLE M, 2007, P 6 INT SPAC SYNT S
[2]  
Brown B, 1997, J ARCHIT PLAN RES, V14, P35
[3]   WAYFINDING BY NEWCOMERS IN A COMPLEX BUILDING [J].
BUTLER, DL ;
ACQUINO, AL ;
HISSONG, AA ;
SCOTT, PA .
HUMAN FACTORS, 1993, 35 (01) :159-173
[4]   Gender differences in spatial orientation: A review [J].
Coluccia, E ;
Louse, G .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 24 (03) :329-340
[5]   The secret is to follow your nose - Route path selection and angularity [J].
Dalton, RC .
ENVIRONMENT AND BEHAVIOR, 2003, 35 (01) :107-131
[6]  
Ericsson K. A., 1993, Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data
[7]  
Fontaine S., 2001, COSIT 2001, P387
[8]  
GARLING T, 1983, J APPL PSYCHOL, V68, P177
[9]   The soft constraints hypothesis: A rational analysis approach to resource allocation for interactive behavior [J].
Gray, Wayne D. ;
Sims, Chris R. ;
Fu, Wai-Tat ;
Schoelles, Michael J. .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2006, 113 (03) :461-482
[10]   Development of a self-report measure of environmental spatial ability [J].
Hegarty, M ;
Richardson, AE ;
Montello, DR ;
Lovelace, K ;
Subbiah, I .
INTELLIGENCE, 2002, 30 (05) :425-447