Effects of pH, Acidity and Ethanol on Astringency and Bitterness of Grape Tannin in Model Wine Solution

被引:0
|
作者
Guo Anque [1 ]
Hao Chong [1 ]
Yong Zihan [1 ]
Wang Weiwei [1 ]
Zhang Peng [1 ]
Wang Jiaming [1 ]
机构
[1] Northwest A&F Univ, Coll Enol, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
关键词
Wine; Tannin; Bitterness; Astringency;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Condensed tannins are the major compounds responsible for the sensory characteristics of bitterness and astringency in wine. However, these sensations are also influenced by many environmental factors in wine matrix. It is essential to understand the comprehensive effects of these factors on the bitterness and astringency of tannin as well as their interactions, which of practically importance for winemaker to control winemaking process and improve the quality of wines. Covering their typical concentration in wine, the combined effects of pH (2.8 - 3.8), acidity (tartaric acid, 1.6 - 8.0 g/L) and ethanol (3.8 - 14.0% vol) on the astringency and bitterness of grape tannin were investigated in a model wine by using the design of quadratic orthogonal rotating combination, and the regression models of test factors and the astringent intensity and the bitterness intensity were established respectively, with the individual and interactive of the factors analyzed. The results showed that pH was the major factor affecting the astringency of tannin, next was the acidity, while the ethanol had no effect. Among them, pH performed a negative effect, while the change curve of astringency with acidity was an open side down parabola. For the bitterness of tannin, ethanol was the most factor, next was acidity, and pH was the least. Ethanol had a positive effect, while acidity showed a negative effect. Under the experimental conditions, no significant interactive effect was found between the factors either for the bitterness or for the astringency of tannin.
引用
收藏
页码:187 / 194
页数:8
相关论文
共 14 条
  • [1] Bitterness and astringency of grape and wine polyphenols
    Brossaud, F
    Cheynier, V
    Noble, AC
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF GRAPE AND WINE RESEARCH, 2001, 7 (01) : 33 - 39
  • [2] DeMiglio P., 2002, P BACCH FUT C ST CAT, P31
  • [3] Demiglio P, 2008, J FOOD AGRIC ENVIRON, V6, P143
  • [4] Fischer U., 1994, Food Quality and Preference, V5, P55, DOI 10.1016/0950-3293(94)90008-6
  • [5] FISCHER U, 1990, THESIS U CALIFORNIA
  • [6] Effect of pH, ethanol and acidity on astringency and bitterness of grape seed tannin oligomers in model wine solution
    Fontoin, Helene
    Saucier, Cedric
    Teissedre, Pierre-Louis
    Glories, Yves
    [J]. FOOD QUALITY AND PREFERENCE, 2008, 19 (03) : 286 - 291
  • [7] Beer astringency assessed by time-intensity and quantitative descriptive analysis:: Influence of pH and accelerated aging
    Francois, Nancy
    Guyot-Declerck, Christine
    Hug, Benedicte
    Callemien, Delphine
    Govaerts, Bernadette
    Collin, Sonia
    [J]. FOOD QUALITY AND PREFERENCE, 2006, 17 (06) : 445 - 452
  • [8] ORAL ASTRINGENCY - A TACTILE COMPONENT OF FLAVOR
    GREEN, BG
    [J]. ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 1993, 84 (01) : 119 - 125
  • [9] TEMPORAL PERCEPTION OF ASTRINGENCY AND SWEETNESS IN RED WINE
    ISHIKAWA, T
    NOBLE, AC
    [J]. FOOD QUALITY AND PREFERENCE, 1995, 6 (01) : 27 - 33
  • [10] Astringency of organic acids is related to pH
    Lawless, HT
    Horne, J
    Giasi, P
    [J]. CHEMICAL SENSES, 1996, 21 (04) : 397 - 403