Integrating philosophy with anthropology in an approach to morality

被引:4
作者
Wong, David B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Durham, NC 27708 USA
关键词
Anthropology; diversity; philosophy; relativism; truth; EVOLUTION; CULTURE;
D O I
10.1177/1463499614534554
中图分类号
Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
030303 ;
摘要
Philosophy and anthropology need to integrate their accounts of what a morality is. I identify three desiderata that an account of morality should satisfy: (1) it should recognize significant diversity and variation in the major kinds of value, (2) it should specify a set of criteria for what counts as a morality, and (3) it should indicate the basis for distinguishing between more or less justifiable moralities, or true and false moralities. I will discuss why these three desiderata are hard to satisfy at the same time, and why they are controversial. Anthropologists and philosophers will differ on which ones they are inclined to reject. I argue that all three should be accepted and can be satisfied.
引用
收藏
页码:336 / 355
页数:20
相关论文
共 44 条
[21]  
Haney Craig., 1973, International Journal of Criminology Penology, V1, P69, DOI DOI 10.1037/H0076835
[22]  
Hare R.M., 1963, Freedom and Reason
[23]  
Hare Richard Mervyn., 1952, The Language of Morals
[24]  
Harman G., 2000, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC, V100, P223
[25]  
Harman Gilbert, 1999, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC, P315, DOI DOI 10.1111/1467-9264.00062
[26]   CROSS-CULTURAL DIFFERENCES IN THE SELF [J].
HOLLAN, D .
JOURNAL OF ANTHROPOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 1992, 48 (04) :283-300
[27]   Harm, affect, and the moral/conventional distinction [J].
Kelly, Daniel ;
Stich, Stephen ;
Haley, Kevin J. ;
Eng, Serena J. ;
Fessler, Daniel M. T. .
MIND & LANGUAGE, 2007, 22 (02) :117-131
[28]   CULTURE AND THE SELF - IMPLICATIONS FOR COGNITION, EMOTION, AND MOTIVATION [J].
MARKUS, HR ;
KITAYAMA, S .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1991, 98 (02) :224-253
[29]  
Milgram, 1974, OBEDIENCE AUTHORITY
[30]  
Miller G.F., 2000, MATING MIND