Women's responses to changes in US preventive task force's mammography screening guidelines: results of focus groups with ethnically diverse women

被引:60
作者
Allen, Jennifer D. [1 ,2 ]
Bluethmann, Shirley Morrison [3 ]
Sheets, Margaret [1 ]
Opdyke, Kelly Morrison [4 ]
Gates-Ferris, Kathryn [4 ]
Hurlbert, Marc [5 ]
Harden, Elizabeth [1 ]
机构
[1] Dana Farber Canc Inst, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Boston, MA USA
[3] Univ Texas Houston, Sch Publ Hlth, Houston, TX USA
[4] Cicatelli Associates Inc, New York, NY USA
[5] Avon Fdn Women, New York, NY USA
关键词
Mammography; Screening guidelines; Health communication; SOCIAL NETWORK CHARACTERISTICS; BREAST-CANCER; SERVICES; RECOMMENDATIONS; ATTITUDES; BENEFITS; IMPACT; CARE; INTERVENTIONS; DISPARITIES;
D O I
10.1186/1471-2458-13-1169
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: The 2009 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) changed mammography guidelines to recommend routine biennial screening starting at age 50. This study describes women's awareness of, attitudes toward, and intention to comply with these new guidelines. Methods: Women ages 40-50 years old were recruited from the Boston area to participate in focus groups (k = 8; n = 77). Groups were segmented by race/ethnicity (Caucasian = 39%; African American = 35%; Latina = 26%), audio-taped, and transcribed. Thematic content analysis was used. Results: Participants were largely unaware of the revised guidelines and suspicious that it was a cost-savings measure by insurers and/or providers. Most did not intend to comply with the change, viewing screening as obligatory. Few felt prepared to participate in shared decision-making or advocate for their preferences with respect to screening. Conclusions: Communication about the rationale for mammography guideline changes has left many women unconvinced about potential disadvantages or limitations of screening. Since further guideline changes are likely to occur with advances in technology and science, it is important to help women become informed consumers of health information and active participants in shared decision-making with providers. Additional research is needed to determine the impact of the USPSTF change on women's screening behaviors and on breast cancer outcomes.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 72 条
  • [1] Breast cancer screening: review of benefits and harms, and recommendations for developing and low-income countries
    Al-Foheidi, Meteb
    Al-Mansour, Mubarak M.
    Ibrahim, Ezzeldin M.
    [J]. MEDICAL ONCOLOGY, 2013, 30 (02)
  • [2] Use of GIS to identify optimal settings for cancer prevention and control in African American communities
    Alcaraz, Kassandra I.
    Kreuter, Matthew W.
    Bryan, Rebecca P.
    [J]. PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2009, 49 (01) : 54 - 57
  • [3] Promoting breast and cervical cancer screening at the workplace: Results from the Woman to Woman Study
    Allen, JD
    Stoddard, AM
    Sorensen, G
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2001, 91 (04) : 584 - 590
  • [4] The relationship between social network characteristics and breast cancer screening practices among employed women
    Allen, JD
    Sorensen, G
    Stoddard, AM
    Peterson, KE
    Colditz, G
    [J]. ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 1999, 21 (03) : 193 - 200
  • [5] Intention to have a mammogram in the future among women who have underused mammography in the past
    Allen, JD
    Sorensen, G
    Stoddard, AM
    Colditz, G
    Peterson, K
    [J]. HEALTH EDUCATION & BEHAVIOR, 1998, 25 (04) : 474 - 488
  • [6] Do Social Network Characteristics Predict Mammography Screening Practices?
    Allen, Jennifer D.
    Stoddard, Anne M.
    Sorensen, Glorian
    [J]. HEALTH EDUCATION & BEHAVIOR, 2008, 35 (06) : 763 - 776
  • [7] Allen Jennifer D, 2011, Semin Oncol Nurs, V27, P192, DOI 10.1016/j.soncn.2011.04.004
  • [8] Patient understanding of the revised USPSTF screening mammogram guidelines: need for development of patient decision aids
    Allen, Summer V.
    Nes, Lise Solberg
    Marnach, Mary L.
    Polga, Kristen
    Jenkins, Sarah M.
    Files, Julia A.
    Croghan, Ivana T.
    Ghosh, Karthik
    Pruthi, Sandhya
    [J]. BMC WOMENS HEALTH, 2012, 12
  • [9] [Anonymous], 11 HLTH PREV ORG DEF
  • [10] [Anonymous], 2005, METHODS COMMUNITY BA