Intercomparison of satellite and ground-based ozone total column measurements

被引：13

作者：

Virolainen, Ya. A. ^{[1
]}

Timofeyev, Yu. M. ^{[1
]}

Poberovsky, A. V. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] St Petersburg State Univ, Fac Phys, St Petersburg 198504, Russia

来源：

IZVESTIYA ATMOSPHERIC AND OCEANIC PHYSICS | 2013年 / 49卷 / 09期

基金：

俄罗斯基础研究基金会;

关键词：

ozone total column; atmospheric remote sensing methods; Fourier spectroscopy; satellite measurements validation; FTIR; OMI;

D O I：

10.1134/S0001433813090235

中图分类号：

P4 [大气科学（气象学）];

学科分类号：

0706 ; 070601 ;

摘要：

Ozone total column (OTC) measurements made in 2009-2012 near St. Petersburg by a Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectrometer (Peterhof, St. Petersburg State University (SPbSU)), an M-124 filter ozonometer, and a Dobson spectrophotometer (Voeikovo, MGO), as well as measurements made by a spectrometer ozone monitoring instrument (OMI) (onboard the AURA satellite) have been analyzed and compared. Comparisons have been performed both between ensembles of ground-based measurement data, as well as between ground-based and satellite data. It has been shown that the standard deviation for all devices is 2.5-4.5%; here, the FTIR and Dobson instruments measuring the direct sun are in better agreement with OMI than the M-124 ozonometer measuring the zenith-scattered solar radiation as well. A seasonal cycle in discrepancy with amplitude of 1.5% has been detected between two series of OTC measurements made by M-124 and OMI instruments for a total of 850 days. In fall and winter, the ground-based measurements underestimate the OTC values in comparison with satellite data; in spring and summer, the situation is reversed: ground-based data overestimate the OTC values. Also, it has been revealed that FTIR measurements systematically overestimate the OTC values in comparison with other instruments: from 1.4% (for Dobson) to 3.4% (for OMI). Taking into account the spatial and temporal discrepancy of independent ensembles of measurements and an analysis of standard deviations between ground-based and satellite measurement data, the FTIR spectrometer (SPbSU) can be recommended for OTC satellite data validation.

引用

页码：993 / 1001

页数：9

共 19 条

[1]

[Anonymous], 2003, 47 WMO

[2] Validation of OMI-TOMS and OMI-DOAS total ozone column using five Brewer spectroradiometers at the Iberian peninsula [J].

Anton, M. ;

Lopez, M. ;

Vilaplana, J. M. ;

Kroon, M. ;

McPeters, R. ;

Banon, M. ;

Serrano, A. .

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2009, 114

[3] Ten years of GOME/ERS2 total ozone data - The new GOME data processor (GDP) version 4: 2. Ground-based validation and comparisons with TOMS V7/V8 [J].

Balis, D. ;

Lambert, J. -C. ;

Van Roozendael, M. ;

Spurr, R. ;

Loyola, D. ;

Livschitz, Y. ;

Valks, P. ;

Amiridis, V. ;

Gerard, P. ;

Granville, J. ;

Zehner, C. .

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2007, 112 (D7)

[4]

Bhartia P.K., 2002, NASA TECH PUB

[5] REPLACEMENT FOR DOBSON SPECTROPHOTOMETER QUESTIONABLE - PRESIDENTIAL-ADDRESS [J].

BREWER, AW .

PURE AND APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 1973, 106 (5-7) :919-927

[6] Comparison of OMI ozone and UV irradiance data with ground-based measurements at two French sites [J].

Buchard, V. ;

Brogniez, C. ;

Auriol, F. ;

Bonnel, B. ;

Lenoble, J. ;

Tanskanen, A. ;

Bojkov, B. ;

Veefkind, P. .

ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2008, 8 (16) :4517-4528

[7]

Dobson G. M. B., 1957, Annals of the International Geophysical Year, VPart1, P46

[8]

Gushchin G.P., 1987, T 6 VSES S 15 17 MAY, P49

[9] Intercomparison of retrieval codes used for the analysis of high-resolution, ground-based FTIR measurements [J].

Hase, F ;

Hannigan, JW ;

Coffey, MT ;

Goldman, A ;

Höpfner, M ;

Jones, NB ;

Rinsland, CP ;

Wood, SW .

JOURNAL OF QUANTITATIVE SPECTROSCOPY & RADIATIVE TRANSFER, 2004, 87 (01) :25-52

[10]

Ialongo I., 2008, ATMOS CHEM PHYS DISC, P2381

← 1 2 →