Energy transfer in hydrogen separation from syngas using pressure swing adsorption (PSA) process: a thermodynamic model

被引:13
作者
Mondal, Mayurakshi [1 ]
Datta, Amitava [1 ]
机构
[1] Jadavpur Univ, Dept Power Engn, Salt Lake Campus, Kolkata 700098, India
关键词
adsorption pressure; column size; energy transfer; hydrogen; pressure swing adsorption; separation; OXYGEN BLOWN GASIFICATION; CARBON-DIOXIDE; ACTIVATED CARBONS; SYNTHESIS GAS; MFI MEMBRANES; PURIFICATION; PERFORMANCE; RECOVERY; METHANE; SECTOR;
D O I
10.1002/er.3627
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
This paper presents the thermodynamic modeling of a pressure swing adsorption (PSA) unit for hydrogen separation from a syngas mixture, which can be obtained from biomass gasification. Two different types of activated carbon (A-20 and Maxsorb III) have been considered for CO2 adsorption from the gas and the variations in the adsorber bed size and energy transfer have been analyzed at different adsorption pressure, ranging from 2000 to 4000kPa, and at 320K temperature. CaX Zeolite has been utilized for the adsorption of other constituents (N-2 and CH4) in the gas mixture. The bed size decreases while the energy consumption in the process increases with the increase in adsorption pressure. The decrease in bed size is found to be 48%-50%, and the energy consumption increases by 31%-32% over the range of adsorption pressure and for the adsorbent materials considered. Allowing the minor components (N-2 and CH4) with hydrogen (without separating them from the gas) drastically reduces the bed size and energy consumption. This reduction of bed size is found to be around 70% for A-20 and 85% for Maxsorb III, and the decrease in power consumption is around 25% for either of the adsorbents. Maxsorb III has been found to be a better CO2 adsorbent with higher working bed capacity than A-20. The analysis has also been extended to 300K bed temperature for Maxsorb III adsorbent to identify the effect of bed temperature on the adsorption process. At this temperature, a decrease of around 30% in column volume and a hike of 27%-35% in the energy consumption have been observed in the aforesaid adsorption pressure range. Copyright (C) 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:448 / 458
页数:11
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Hydrogen membrane separation techniques [J].
Adhikari, S ;
Fernando, S .
INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 2006, 45 (03) :875-881
[2]   The maximum coefficient of performance of internally irreversible refrigerators and heat pumps [J].
AitAli, MA .
JOURNAL OF PHYSICS D-APPLIED PHYSICS, 1996, 29 (04) :975-980
[3]   Amine functionalised metal organic frameworks (MOFs) as adsorbents for carbon dioxide [J].
Arstad, Bjornar ;
Fjellvag, Helmer ;
Kongshaug, Kjell Ove ;
Swang, Ole ;
Blom, Richard .
ADSORPTION-JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL ADSORPTION SOCIETY, 2008, 14 (06) :755-762
[4]   Adsorption Measurements of Nitrogen and Methane in Hydrogen-Rich Mixtures at High Pressures [J].
Bastos-Neto, Moises ;
Moeller, Andreas ;
Staudt, Reiner ;
Boehm, Juergen ;
Gaeser, Roger .
INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 2011, 50 (17) :10211-10221
[5]   Exergy based performance analysis of hydrogen production from rice straw using oxygen blown gasification [J].
Bhattacharya, Atmadeep ;
Das, Anirban ;
Datta, Amitava .
ENERGY, 2014, 69 :525-533
[6]   Modeling of hydrogen production process from biomass using oxygen blown gasification [J].
Bhattacharya, Atmadeep ;
Bhattacharya, Abhishek ;
Datta, Amitava .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2012, 37 (24) :18782-18790
[7]   Hydrogen recovery from off-gases with nitrogen-rich impurity by pressure swing adsorption using CaX and 5A zeolites [J].
Delgado, Jose A. ;
Agueda, Vicente I. ;
Uguina, Maria A. ;
Sotelo, Jose L. ;
Brea, Pablo .
ADSORPTION-JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL ADSORPTION SOCIETY, 2015, 21 (1-2) :107-123
[8]   Review and evaluation of hydrogen production methods for better sustainability [J].
Dincer, Ibrahim ;
Acar, Canan .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2015, 40 (34) :11094-11111
[9]   Electrochemical reforming vs. catalytic reforming of ethanol: A process energy analysis for hydrogen production [J].
Gutierrez-Guerra, N. ;
Jimenez-Vazquez, M. ;
Serrano-Ruiz, J. C. ;
Valverde, J. L. ;
de Lucas-Consuegra, A. .
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING AND PROCESSING-PROCESS INTENSIFICATION, 2015, 95 :9-16
[10]  
Hauchhum L, 2015, TRANSPORT POROUS MED, P1