Farm-level risk factors for fluoroquinolone resistance in E-coli and thermophilic Campylobacter spp. on finisher pig farms

被引:21
作者
Taylor, N. M. [1 ]
Clifton-Hadley, F. A. [2 ]
Wales, A. D. [2 ]
Ridley, A. [2 ]
Davies, R. H. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Reading, Vet Epidemiol & Econ Res Unit, Sch Agr Policy & Dev, Reading RG6 6AR, Berks, England
[2] Vet Labs Agcy Weybridge, Dept Food & Environm Safety, Surrey, England
关键词
Antimicrobial resistance; Campylobacter; E; coli; Fluoroquinolone; pigs; risk factors; MULTIPLE ANTIBIOTIC-RESISTANCE; ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE; QUINOLONE RESISTANCE; FATTENING PIGS; PREVALENCE; HUMANS; POULTRY; CATTLE; EPIDEMIOLOGY; POPULATION;
D O I
10.1017/S0950268808001854
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Logistic regression, supported by other statistical analyses was used to explore the possible association of risk factors with the fluoroquinolone (FQ)-resistance status of 108 pig finisher farms in Great Britain. The farms were classified as 'affected' or 'not affected' by FQ-resistant E. coli or Campylobacter spp. on the basis of isolation of organisms from faecal samples on media containing 1 mg/l FQ. The use of FQ was the most important factor associated with finding resistant E. coli and/or Campylobacter, which were found on 79% (FQ-resistant E. coli) and 86% (FQ-resistant Campylobacter) of farms with a history of FQ use. However, resistant bacteria were also found on 19% (FQ-resistant E. coli) and 54% (FQ-resistant Campylobacter) of farms with no history of FQ use. For FQ-resistant E. coli, biosecurity measures may be protective and there was strong seasonal variation, with more farms found affected when sampled in the summer. For FQ-resistant Campylobacter, the buying-in of grower stock may increase risk and good on-farm hygiene may be protective. The findings suggest that resistant organisms, particularly Campylobacter, may spread between pig farms.
引用
收藏
页码:1121 / 1134
页数:14
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]   The effects of antibiotic usage in food animals on the development of antimicrobial resistance of importance for humans in Campylobacter and Escherichia coli [J].
Aarestrup, FM ;
Wegener, HC .
MICROBES AND INFECTION, 1999, 1 (08) :639-644
[2]  
Agresti A., 2007, INTRO CATEGORICAL DA, V2nd, P372, DOI [10.1002/0471249688, DOI 10.1002/0470114754, 10.1002/0470114754, DOI 10.1002/0471249688]
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2001, SAS STAT SOFTW VERS
[4]  
*BAY HEALTHC, GUID US QUIN VET MED
[5]  
COLLETT D, 2003, C&H TEXT STAT SCI, P1
[6]   Emergence of fluoroquinolone resistance in the native Campylobacter coli population of pigs exposed to enrofloxacin [J].
Delsol, AA ;
Sunderland, J ;
Woodward, MJ ;
Pumbwe, L ;
Piddock, LJV ;
Roe, JM .
JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 2004, 53 (05) :872-874
[7]   Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada [J].
Dunlop, RH ;
McEwen, SA ;
Meek, AH ;
Clarke, RC ;
Black, WD ;
Friendship, RM .
PREVENTIVE VETERINARY MEDICINE, 1998, 34 (04) :283-305
[8]   QUINOLONE RESISTANCE IN CAMPYLOBACTER ISOLATED FROM MAN AND POULTRY FOLLOWING THE INTRODUCTION OF FLUOROQUINOLONES IN VETERINARY-MEDICINE [J].
ENDTZ, HP ;
RUIJS, GJ ;
VANKLINGEREN, B ;
JANSEN, WH ;
VANDERREYDEN, T ;
MOUTON, RP .
JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 1991, 27 (02) :199-208
[9]   Quinolone and macrolide resistance in Campylobacter jejuni and C-coli:: Resistance mechanisms and trends in human isolates [J].
Engberg, J ;
Aarestrup, FM ;
Taylor, DE ;
Gerner-Smidt, P ;
Nachamkin, I .
EMERGING INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2001, 7 (01) :24-34
[10]  
EVERITT B, 1980, CLUSTER ANAL, P136