The Mexican Cervical Cancer Screening Trial Self-Sampling for Human Papillomavirus With Unaided Visual Inspection as a Secondary Screen

被引:17
作者
Belinson, Jerome L. [1 ]
Pretorius, Robert G. [3 ]
Enerson, Christine [4 ]
Garcia, Francisco [1 ]
Perez Cruz, Eduardo
Belinson, Suzanne E. [5 ]
Yeverino Garcia, Eduardo
Brainard, Jennnifer [2 ]
机构
[1] Cleveland Clin, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[2] Cleveland Clin, Dept Pathol, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[3] So Calif Permanente Med Grp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Fontana, CA USA
[4] Prevent Oncol Int, Morelia, Michoacan, Mexico
[5] Northwestern Univ, Dept Prevent Med, Feinberg Sch Med, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
关键词
HPV; Self-sampling; Screening; ACETIC-ACID; WOMEN; CRYOTHERAPY; PREVENTION; LESIONS; INDIA; RISK; HPV;
D O I
10.1111/IGC.0b013e318197f479
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The Mexican Cervical Cancer Screening (MECCS) study took place in the State of Michoacan. Primary screening was by self-sampling for high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV). The objectives were to increase the specificity of primary HPV screening by requiring 2 positive HPV tests I year apart in women whose secondary screen was negative according to an acetic acid-aided visual inspection (VIA). In addition, we postulated that the sensitivity of VIA would be sufficient to identify large preinvasive lesions and cancers unsuitable for cryotherapy if applied in a see-and-treat algorithm. A total of 8621 women (aged 30-50 years) were screened, and 14.3% were positive for HR-HPV In phase 1, 11.9% of the HPV-positive women were VIA-positive and were referred for colposcopy with directed and random biopsies. If VIA-negative, women repeated the self-sample I year later to detect persistent HR-HPV (25.2% were positive). If persistently HR-HPV-positive in phase 2, patients again had VIA, then all women (both VIA-positive and -negative) received directed and random biopsies. If cryotherapy had been used to treat HPV- and VIA-positive women in phase 1 or persistent HR-HPV-positive (phase 2), the potential risk of under treatment Would have been 4.1%, and 66.4% of the treated patients Would have had normal or cervical intraepithelial neoplasia I on biopsy. The VIA triage would refer 0.73% of the patients to colposcopy owing to the lesion size, location, or the presence of a cancer. On the basis of this pilot study, we are encouraged to explore and evaluate a rapid, more sensitive, and more specific self-test.
引用
收藏
页码:27 / 32
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Feasibility and applicability of self-sampling based online cervical cancer screening: findings from the China online cervical cancer screening trial
    Zhang, Yi
    Du, Hui
    Wang, Chun
    Huang, Xia
    Qu, Xinfeng
    Wu, Ruifang
    [J]. INFECTIOUS AGENTS AND CANCER, 2024, 19 (01)
  • [22] Promotion of Cervical Screening among Long-term Non-attendees by Human Papillomavirus Self-sampling
    Ernstson, Avalon
    Forslund, Ola
    Borgfeldt, Christer
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CANCER PREVENTION, 2021, 26 (01) : 25 - 31
  • [23] Women's perspectives on human papillomavirus self-sampling in the context of the UK cervical screening programme
    Williams, Denitza
    Davies, Myfanwy
    Fiander, Alison
    Farewell, Daniel
    Hillier, Sharon
    Brain, Kate
    [J]. HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2017, 20 (05) : 1031 - 1040
  • [24] Community-randomised controlled trial embedded in the Anishinaabek Cervical Cancer Screening Study: human papillomavirus self-sampling versus Papanicolaou cytology
    Zehbe, Ingeborg
    Jackson, Robert
    Wood, Brianne
    Weaver, Bruce
    Escott, Nicholas
    Severini, Alberto
    Krajden, Mel
    Bishop, Lisa
    Morrisseau, Kyla
    Ogilvie, Gina
    Burchell, Ann N.
    Little, Julian
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2016, 6 (10):
  • [25] Rationale and design of the HOME trial: A pragmatic randomized controlled trial of home-based human papillomavirus (HPV) self-sampling for increasing cervical cancer screening uptake and effectiveness in a US healthcare system
    Winer, Rachel L.
    Tiro, Jasmin A.
    Miglioretti, Diana L.
    Thayer, Chris
    Beatty, Tara
    Lin, John
    Gao, Hongyuan
    Kimbel, Kilian
    Buist, Diana S. M.
    [J]. CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL TRIALS, 2018, 64 : 77 - 87
  • [26] Cervical cancer screening improvements with self-sampling during the COVID-19 pandemic
    Elfstrom, Miriam
    Gray, Penelope Grace
    Dillner, Joakim
    [J]. ELIFE, 2023, 12
  • [27] Recent HPV self-sampling use for cervical cancer screening in Latin America and Caribbean: a systematic review
    Dartibale, Camila B.
    Prado, Gabriela de C.
    Carobeli, Lucimara R.
    Meirelles, Lyvia E. de F.
    Damke, Gabrielle M. Z. F.
    Damke, Edilson
    Morelli, Fabricio
    Souza, Raquel P.
    Grp Prevent Yorself, Vania R. S.
    da Silva, Vania R. S.
    Consolaro, Marcia E. L.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 12
  • [28] Effectiveness and feasibility of self-sampling for human papillomavirus testing for internet-based cervical cancer screening
    Li, Jingran
    Wu, Ruifang
    Qu, Xinfeng
    Huang, Xia
    Li, Ling
    Lin, Zhixin
    Zhang, Zhijun
    Deng, Jihong
    Liu, Rong
    Zhao, Xiaofeng
    Zhang, Songling
    Lin, Bei
    An, Ruifang
    Zhao, Chao
    Li, Mingzhu
    Zhao, Yun
    Wei, Lihui
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 10
  • [29] Influence of Spirituality and Modesty on Acceptance of Self-Sampling for Cervical Cancer Screening
    Dareng, Eileen O.
    Jedy-Agba, Elima
    Bamisaye, Patience
    Modibbo, Fatima Isa
    Oyeneyin, Lawal O.
    Adewole, Ayodele S.
    Olaniyan, Olayinka B.
    Dakum, Patrick S.
    Pharoah, Paul D.
    Adebamowo, Clement A.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (11):
  • [30] Improvement of Gynecological Screening of Female Renal Transplant Recipients by Self-Sampling for Human Papillomavirus Detection
    Hinten, Floor
    Hilbrands, Luuk B.
    Meeuwis, Kim A.
    van Bergen-Verkuyten, Muriel C.
    Slangen, Brigitte F.
    van Rossum, Michelle M.
    Rahamat-Langendoen, Janette
    Massuger, Leon F.
    de Hullu, Joanne A.
    Melchers, Willem J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LOWER GENITAL TRACT DISEASE, 2017, 21 (01) : 33 - 36