A comparison of vaginal ultrasound and digital examination in predicting preterm delivery in women with threatened preterm labor: a cohort study

被引:7
作者
Pinton, Anne [1 ]
Severac, Francois [2 ]
Meyer, Nicolas [2 ]
Akladios, Cherif Y. [1 ]
Gaudineau, Adrien [1 ]
Favre, Romain [1 ]
Langer, Bruno [1 ]
Sananes, Nicolas [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Strasbourg Teaching Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Ave Moliere, F-67098 Strasbourg, France
[2] Strasbourg Univ Teaching Hosp, Dept Publ Hlth, Strasbourg, France
[3] INSERM, UMR S 1121, Biomat & Bioengn, Natl Inst Hlth & Med Res, Strasbourg, France
关键词
Preterm birth; cervix; ultrasound; cervical length; digital examination; PREMATURE DELIVERY; INTACT MEMBRANES; CERVICAL LENGTH; UTERINE CERVIX; ULTRASONOGRAPHIC EXAMINATION; INCOMPETENT CERVIX; FETAL WEIGHT; RISK; EPIDEMIOLOGY; BIRTH;
D O I
10.1111/aogs.13071
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Introduction. The aim of this study is to evaluate the utility of digital examination in addition to ultrasonic measurement of cervical length for predicting spontaneous preterm delivery in women with threatened preterm labor. Material and methods. This was a prospective cohort study in Strasbourg University Hospital, France, between January 2013 and January 2015. All women with a singleton pregnancy hospitalized with threatened preterm labor between 23 and 34 weeks of gestation were included. Cases of iatrogenic preterm delivery were excluded. A multivariable logistic regression model to estimate the significant predictive parameters of spontaneous preterm delivery was performed. The primary endpoint of our study was a preterm birth before 34 weeks of gestation. Results. A total of 395 women were included in our study. The rate of preterm delivery before 34 weeks was 13%. In univariate analysis every single cervical parameter assessed by the digital examination and all the ultrasound parameters were significantly associated with preterm delivery. The final model included five variables predicting preterm birth: visualization of the membranes at the speculum examination (OR 15.8, 95% CI 2.43-146), ultrasound cervical length (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.75-0.89), signs of inflammation (OR 6.23, 95% CI 2.07-22.9), gestational age on admission (OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.71-1.0), and presence of vaginal infection (OR 4.28, 95% CI 1.52-12.7). None of the cervical parameters assessed by the digital examination provided additional predictive value of preterm delivery. Conclusion. Our study suggests that digital examination does not add to the information given by vaginal ultrasound evaluation in predicting preterm labor.
引用
收藏
页码:447 / 453
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The role of cervical length in women with threatened preterm labor: is it a valid predictor at any gestational age?
    Hiersch, Liran
    Yogev, Yariv
    Domniz, Noam
    Meizner, Israel
    Bardin, Ron
    Melamed, Nir
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2014, 211 (05) : 532.e1 - 532.e9
  • [42] The Prevalence of Vaginal Microorganisms in Pregnant Women with Preterm Labor and Preterm Birth
    Choi, Seong Jin
    Park, Soon Deok
    Jang, In Ho
    Uh, Young
    Lee, Anna
    ANNALS OF LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2012, 32 (03) : 194 - 200
  • [43] Development and validation of a multivariable prediction model of spontaneous preterm delivery and microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity in women with preterm labor
    Cobo, Teresa
    Aldecoa, Victoria
    Figueras, Francesc
    Herranz, Ana
    Ferrero, Silvia
    Izquierdo, Montse
    Murillo, Clara
    Amoedo, Raquel
    Rueda, Claudia
    Bosch, Jordi
    Martinez-Portilla, Raigam J.
    Gratacos, Eduard
    Palacio, Montse
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 223 (03) : 421.e1 - 421.e14
  • [44] Comparison of cesarean versus vaginal delivery of extremely preterm gestations in breech presentation: retrospective cohort study
    Niles, Kirsten M.
    Barrett, Jon F. R.
    Ladhani, Noor Niyar N.
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2019, 32 (07) : 1142 - 1147
  • [45] Can myometrial thickness/cervical length ratio predict preterm delivery in singleton pregnancies with threatened preterm labor? A prospective study
    Selen Gürsoy Erzincan
    N. Cenk Sayin
    Selcuk Korkmaz
    Havva Sutcu
    Cihan Inan
    Isil Uzun Cilingir
    Fusun G. Varol
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2019, 299 : 1275 - 1282
  • [46] Can myometrial thickness/cervical length ratio predict preterm delivery in singleton pregnancies with threatened preterm labor? A prospective study
    Erzincan, Selen Gursoy
    Sayin, N. Cenk
    Korkmaz, Selcuk
    Sutcu, Havva
    Inan, Cihan
    Cilingir, Isil Uzun
    Varol, Fusun G.
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2019, 299 (05) : 1275 - 1282
  • [47] Effectiveness of the contemporary treatment of preterm labor: a comparison with a historical cohort
    Wagner, Philipp
    Sonek, Jiri
    Abele, Harald
    Sarah, Loefler
    Hoopmann, Markus
    Brucker, Sara
    Wu, Qinging
    Kagan, Karl Oliver
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2017, 296 (01) : 27 - 34
  • [48] Vaginal Microbiota and Cytokine Levels Predict Preterm Delivery in Asian Women
    Kumar, Manoj
    Murugesan, Selvasankar
    Singh, Parul
    Saadaoui, Marwa
    Elhag, Duaa Ahmed
    Terranegra, Annalisa
    Kabeer, Basirudeen Syed Ahamed
    Marr, Alexandra K.
    Kino, Tomoshige
    Brummaier, Tobias
    McGready, Rose
    Nosten, Francois
    Chaussabel, Damien
    Al Khodor, Souhaila
    FRONTIERS IN CELLULAR AND INFECTION MICROBIOLOGY, 2021, 11
  • [49] Cost-effectiveness analysis of cervical length measurement and fibronectin testing in women with threatened preterm labor
    van Baaren, Gert-Jan
    Vis, Jolande Y.
    Grobman, William A.
    Bossuyt, Patrick M.
    Opmeer, Brent C.
    Mol, Ben W.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2013, 209 (05) : 436.e1 - 436.e8
  • [50] Predictive value of cervical length in women with twin pregnancy presenting with threatened preterm labor
    Melamed, N.
    Hiersch, L.
    Gabbay-Benziv, R.
    Bardin, R.
    Meizner, I.
    Wiznitzer, A.
    Yogev, Y.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 46 (01) : 73 - 81