Impact of recipient MELD score on resource utilization

被引:66
作者
Washburn, W. K. [1 ]
Pollock, B. H.
Nichols, L.
Speeg, K. V.
Halff, G.
机构
[1] Univ Texas, Hlth Sci Ctr, Transplant Ctr, San Antonio, TX 78229 USA
[2] Univ Texas, Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, San Antonio, TX USA
关键词
liver transplantation; MELD; resource utilization; STAGE LIVER-DISEASE; MODEL; TRANSPLANTATION; ALLOCATION; PREDICTORS; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.1111/j.1600-6143.2006.01490.x
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
The model for end stage liver disease (MELD) system prioritizes deceased donor organs to the sickest patients who historically require higher healthcare expenditures. Limited information exists regarding the association of recipient MELD score with resource use. Adult recipients of a primary liver allograft (n = 222) performed at a single center in the first 27 months of the MELD system were analyzed. Costs were obtained for each recipient for the 12 defined categories of resource utilization from the time of transplant until discharge. True (calculated) MELD scores were used. Inpatient transplant costs were significantly associated with recipient MELD score (r = 0.20; p = 0.002). Overall 1-year patient survival was 85.0% and was not associated with MELD score (p = 0.57, log rank test). Recipient MELD score was significantly associated with costs for pharmacy, laboratories, radiology, dialysis and physical therapy. Multivariate linear regression revealed that MELD score was most strongly associated with cost compared to other demographic and clinical factors. Recipient MELD score is correlated with transplant costs without significantly impacting survival.
引用
收藏
页码:2449 / 2454
页数:6
相关论文
共 18 条
[11]  
MARKMANN J, TRANSPLANTATION, V72, P1113
[12]   A correlation between the pretransplantation MELD score and mortality in the first two years after liver transplantation [J].
Onaca, NN ;
Levy, MF ;
Sanchez, EQ ;
Chinnakotla, S ;
Fasola, CG ;
Thomas, MJ ;
Weinstein, JS ;
Murray, NG ;
Goldstein, RM ;
Klintmalm, GB .
LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2003, 9 (02) :117-123
[13]   The sickest first? Disparities with model for end-stage liver disease-based organ allocation: One region's experience [J].
Schaffer, RL ;
Kulkarni, S ;
Harper, A ;
Millis, JM ;
Cronin, DC .
LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2003, 9 (11) :1211-1215
[14]  
Schaubel DE, 2005, AM J TRANSPLANT, V5, P265
[15]   Resource utilization in liver transplantation - Effects of patient characteristics and clinical practice [J].
Showstack, J ;
Katz, PP ;
Lake, JR ;
Brown, RS ;
Dudley, RA ;
Belle, S ;
Wiesner, RH ;
Zetterman, RK ;
Everhart, J .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1999, 281 (15) :1381-1386
[16]   MELD scores of liver transplant recipients according to size of waiting list - Impact of organ allocation and patient outcomes [J].
Trotter, JF ;
Osgood, MJ .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2004, 291 (15) :1871-1874
[17]   Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) and allocation of donor livers [J].
Wiesner, R ;
Edwards, E ;
Freeman, R ;
Harper, A ;
Kim, R ;
Kamath, P ;
Kremers, W ;
Lake, J ;
Howard, T ;
Merion, RM ;
Wolfe, RA ;
Krom, R .
GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2003, 124 (01) :91-96
[18]   MELD and PELD: Application of survival models to liver allocation [J].
Wiesner, RH ;
McDiarmid, SV ;
Kamath, PS ;
Edwards, EB ;
Malinchoc, M ;
Kremers, WK ;
Krom, RAF ;
Kim, WR .
LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2001, 7 (07) :567-580