Differential response to intravitreal dexamethasone implant in naive and previously treated diabetic macular edema eyes

被引:11
作者
Zarranz-Ventura, Javier [1 ,2 ]
Romero-Nunez, Barbara [1 ]
Bernal-Morales, Carolina [1 ]
Velazquez-Villoria, Daniel [3 ]
Sala-Puigdollers, Anna [1 ,2 ]
Figueras-Roca, Marc [1 ,2 ]
Copete, Sergio [3 ]
Distefano, Laura [3 ]
Boixadera, Anna [3 ]
Garcia-Arumi, Jose [3 ]
Adan, Alfredo [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Clin Barcelona, Inst Clin Oftalmol ICOF, C Sabino Arana 1, Barcelona 08028, Spain
[2] Inst Invest Biomed August Pi & Sunyer IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain
[3] Hosp Valle De Hebron, Dept Oftalmol, Barcelona, Spain
关键词
Diabetic macular edema; Real world setting; Naï ve; Previously treated; Refractory; Dexamethasone; Implant; Ozurdex; Audit; Benchmark standard; REAL-LIFE; EFFICACY; RANIBIZUMAB; BEVACIZUMAB; 3-YEAR; SAFETY; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1186/s12886-020-01716-2
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Background To identify different response patterns to intravitreal dexamethasone implants (IDI) in naive and previously treated (PT) diabetic macular edema (DME) eyes in a real-life setting. Methods 342 IDI injections (203 DME eyes) were included. Number of IDI injections, percentage (%) of eyes with 1, 2, 3 and >= 4 injections, time to reinjections, visual acuity (VA), intraocular pressure (IOP) and central retinal thickness (CRT) were evaluated for naive and PT DME eyes over 24 months. Results Mean number of injections was significantly lower in naive vs PT DME eyes (1.40 +/- 0.9 vs 1.82 +/- 0.9, p < 0.001). The percentage of eyes receiving 1 injection was significantly higher in naive vs PT DME eyes (76.1 vs 47.7), (p < 0.001). However, it was significantly lower for 2 (16.4 vs 29.4), or 3 injections (1.4 vs 17.6) (both p < 0.001), with no differences in eyes receiving >= 4 injections (5.9 vs 5.1 respectively, p = 0.80). Mean time to reinjection was not significantly different between both groups for the second, third and fourth injection (9.6 +/- 4.0 vs 10.0 +/- 5.5, p = 0.75, 13.2 +/- 4.0 vs 16.0 +/- 3.5, p = 0.21 and 21.7 +/- 3.8 vs 19.7 +/- 5.8, p = 0.55). VA scores were consistently better in naive vs PT DME eyes at all studied timepoints, with no significant differences in CRT reduction or adverse effect rates. Conclusion Naive DME eyes received lower number of IDI injections and showed better VA levels than PT DME eyes for 24 months in a real-world setting. This data supports the IDI use in early DME stages and provide further evidence of better IDI response when used as first-line therapy.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 46 条
  • [11] Dexamethasone implant in diabetic macular edema in real-life situations
    Chhablani, J.
    Bansal, P.
    Veritti, D.
    Sambhana, S.
    Sarao, V.
    Pichi, F.
    Carrai, P.
    Massaro, D.
    Lembo, A.
    Mansour, A. M.
    Banker, A.
    Gupta, S. R.
    Hamam, R.
    Lanzetta, P.
    [J]. EYE, 2016, 30 (03) : 426 - 430
  • [12] INVICTUS: intravitreal anti-VEGF and dexamethasone implant comparison for the treatment of diabetic macular edema: a 6 months follow-up Study
    Comet, Alban
    Gascon, Pierre
    Sauvan, Lauren
    Donnadieu, Benjamin
    Matonti, Frederic
    [J]. ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA, 2019, 97 (06) : E937 - E938
  • [13] One-Year Outcomes of the DA VINCI Study of VEGF Trap-Eye in Eyes with Diabetic Macular Edema
    Do, Diana V.
    Quan Dong Nguyen
    Boyer, David
    Schmidt-Erfurth, Ursula
    Brown, David M.
    Vitti, Robert
    Berliner, Alyson J.
    Gao, Bo
    Zeitz, Oliver
    Ruckert, Rene
    Schmelter, Thomas
    Sandbrink, Rupert
    Heier, Jeff S.
    [J]. OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2012, 119 (08) : 1658 - 1665
  • [14] Dexamethasone Intravitreal Implant for Treatment of Patients with Persistent Diabetic Macular Edema
    Dutra Medeiros, Marco
    Postorino, Maurizio
    Navarro, Rafael
    Garcia-Arumi, Jose
    Mateo, Carlos
    Corcostegui, Borja
    [J]. OPHTHALMOLOGICA, 2014, 231 (03) : 141 - 146
  • [15] Diabetic macular oedema: physical, physiological and molecular factors contribute to this pathological process
    Ehrlich, Rita
    Harris, Alon
    Ciulla, Thomas A.
    Kheradiya, Nisha
    Winston, Diana M.
    Wirostko, Barbara
    [J]. ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA, 2010, 88 (03) : 279 - 291
  • [16] Vascular permeability in ocular disease and the role of tight junctions
    Erickson K.K.
    Sundstrom J.M.
    Antonetti D.A.
    [J]. Angiogenesis, 2007, 10 (2) : 103 - 117
  • [17] Anatomic Response to Intravitreal Dexamethasone Implant and Baseline Aqueous Humor Cytokine Levels in Diabetic Macular Edema
    Figueras-Roca, Marc
    Sala-Puigdollers, Anna
    Zarranz-Ventura, Javier
    Alba-Linero, Carmen
    Alforja, Socorro
    Esquinas, Cristina
    Molins, Blanca
    Adan, Alfredo
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2019, 60 (05) : 1336 - 1343
  • [18] Predictive capacity of baseline hyperreflective dots on the intravitreal dexamethasone implant (Ozurdex®) outcomes in diabetic macular edema: a multicenter study
    Fonollosa, Alejandro
    Zarranz-Ventura, Javier
    Valverde, Alicia
    Becerra, Erika
    Bernal-Morales, Carolina
    Pastor-Idoate, Salvador
    Angel Zapata, Miguel
    [J]. GRAEFES ARCHIVE FOR CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2019, 257 (11) : 2381 - 2390
  • [19] Bevacizumab or Dexamethasone Implants for DME: 2-year Results (The BEVORDEX Study)
    Fraser-Bell, Samantha
    Lim, Lyndell L.
    Campain, Anna
    Mehta, Hemal
    Aroney, Christine
    Bryant, Jaclyn
    Li, Ji
    Quin, Godfrey J.
    McAllister, Ian L.
    Gillies, Mark C.
    [J]. OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2016, 123 (06) : 1399 - 1401
  • [20] Intravitreal triamcinolone for refractory diabetic macular edema - Two-year results of a double-masked, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial
    Gillies, Mark C.
    Sutter, Florian K. P.
    Simpson, Judy M.
    Larsson, Jorgen
    Ali, Haipha
    Zhu, Meidong
    [J]. OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2006, 113 (09) : 1533 - 1538