Validating the Strategies Analysis Diagram: Assessing the reliability and validity of a formative method

被引:19
作者
Cornelissen, Miranda [1 ,2 ]
McClure, Roderick [2 ]
Salmon, Paul M. [3 ]
Stanton, Neville A. [4 ]
机构
[1] Griffith Univ, Griffith Aviat, Nathan, Qld 4111, Australia
[2] Monash Univ, Monash Injury Res Inst, Clayton, Vic 3800, Australia
[3] Univ Sunshine Coast, Fac Arts & Business, Univ Sunshine Coast Accid Res, Maroochydore, Qld 4558, Australia
[4] Univ Southampton, Fac Engn & Environm, Civil Maritime Environm Engn & Sci Unit, Southampton SO17 1BJ, Hants, England
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Strategies Analysis Diagram; Cognitive Work Analysis; Validation; ERROR IDENTIFICATION; TASK-ANALYSIS; ERGONOMICS;
D O I
10.1016/j.apergo.2014.04.010
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The Strategies Analysis Diagram (SAD) is a recently developed method to model the range of possible strategies available for activities in complex sociotechnical systems. Previous applications of the new method have shown that it can effectively identify a comprehensive range of strategies available to humans performing activity within a particular system. A recurring criticism of Ergonomics methods is however, that substantive evidence regarding their performance is lacking. For a method to be widely used by other practitioners such evaluations are necessary. This article presents an evaluation of criterion-referenced validity and test-retest reliability of the SAD method when used by novice analysts. The findings show that individual analyst performance was average. However, pooling the individual analyst outputs into a group model increased the reliability and validity of the method. It is concluded that the SAD method's reliability and validity can be assured through the use of a structured process in which analysts first construct an individual model, followed by either another analyst pooling the individual results or a group process pooling individual models into an agreed group model. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd and The Ergonomics Society. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1484 / 1494
页数:11
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [1] Work domain analysis for air traffic controller weather displays
    Ahlstrom, U
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SAFETY RESEARCH, 2005, 36 (02) : 159 - 169
  • [2] [Anonymous], BARRIERS AND ACCIDEN
  • [3] [Anonymous], PAPER PRESENTED AT T
  • [4] [Anonymous], THEOR ISSUES ERGON S
  • [5] [Anonymous], COGNITIVE WORK ANALY
  • [6] [Anonymous], WORK DOMAIN ANALYSIS
  • [7] [Anonymous], PAPER PRESENTED AT T
  • [8] [Anonymous], PAPER PRESENTED AT T
  • [9] [Anonymous], PROC HUM FACTORS ERG
  • [10] TASK-ANALYSIS FOR ERROR IDENTIFICATION - A METHODOLOGY FOR DESIGNING ERROR-TOLERANT CONSUMER PRODUCTS
    BABER, C
    STANTON, NA
    [J]. ERGONOMICS, 1994, 37 (11) : 1923 - 1941