Computed tomography attenuation value for the characterization of pleural effusions in dogs: A cross-sectional study in 58 dogs

被引:8
作者
Briola, Chiara [1 ]
Zoia, Andrea [2 ]
Rocchi, Paola [3 ]
Caldin, Marco [4 ]
Bertolini, Giovanna [1 ]
机构
[1] San Marco Vet Clin & Lab, Diagnost & Intervent Radiol Div, Via Ind 3, I-35030 Padua, Italy
[2] San Marco Vet Clin & Lab, Internal Med Div, Via Ind 3, I-35030 Padua, Italy
[3] San Marco Vet Clin & Lab, Emergency & Crit Care Div, Via Ind 3, I-35030 Padua, Italy
[4] San Marco Vet Clin & Lab, Clin Pathol Div, Via Ind 3, I-35030 Padua, Italy
关键词
Pleural effusion; Computed tomography; Attenuation value; Hounsfield unit; Dog; CT FINDINGS; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; VARIABILITY; DIAGNOSIS; EFFICACY; FEATURES; FLUID;
D O I
10.1016/j.rvsc.2019.04.024
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
CT attenuation value can help to differentiate exudate from transudate in people. The aim of this cross-sectional study was to assess the utility of CT in characterizing pleural effusions based on attenuation values in a population of dogs having CT and diagnostic thoracentesis within 48 h of each other. The CT attenuation values were determined using four circular, same size, regions of interest (ROIs) placed on the same CT slice with the greatest quantity of fluid. Values of each ROI were recorded and the mean of the four ROIs mean values (mean of the means) was calculated and considered as the CT attenuation value of that patient. The final population included 23 proper inflammatory exudates, 15 chylous effusions, 12 hemorrhagic effusions and 8 transudates. The median of 'mean of the means' values were: exudate 19.22 HU (8.23 to 37.66 HU); chylous effusion 10.26 HU ( - 0.90 to 15.37); hemorrhagic effusion 31.65 HU (18.10 to 54.97), and transudate 11.20 HU, ( - 2.52 to 16.59). CT accurately differentiated hemorrhagic from chylous effusion (AUC 1.0, P < 0.0001) and hemorrhagic effusion from transudate (AUC 1.0, P < 0.0001); CT-values allowed good accuracy in distinguishing exudates from transudates [AUC 0.87 (95%, CI: 0.74-1.0; P < 0.0001)]. HU attenuation values did not accurately differentiate between transudates and chylous effusion. A cutoff value of 34.68 HU (sensitivity of 96% and specificity of 95%) discriminated between exudates and hemorrhagic effusions. CT-value < 12.15 HU had a sensitivity of 94% and specificity of 78% for identify transudate or chylous effusion.
引用
收藏
页码:357 / 365
页数:9
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   Pleural Effusion: Characterization with CT Attenuation Values and CT Appearance [J].
Abramowitz, Yigal ;
Simanovsky, Natalia ;
Goldstein, Michael S. ;
Hiller, Nurith .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2009, 192 (03) :618-623
[2]   Evaluation of CT findings for diagnosis of pleural effusions [J].
Arenas-Jiménez, J ;
Alonso-Charterina, S ;
Sánchez-Payá, J ;
Fernández-Latorre, F ;
Gil-Sánchez, S ;
Lloret-Llorens, M .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2000, 10 (04) :681-690
[3]  
Basu S, 2011, IEEE SYS MAN CYBERN, P1306, DOI 10.1109/ICSMC.2011.6083840
[4]  
Bertolini G., 2017, BODY MDTC SMALL ANIM, P348
[5]   PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF THE PLEURAL SPACE [J].
BOGGS, DS ;
KINASEWITZ, GT .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF THE MEDICAL SCIENCES, 1995, 309 (01) :53-59
[6]  
Broaddus V. C., 2016, MURRAY NADELS TXB RE, P1439
[7]   Biochemical analysis of pleural, peritoneal and pericardial effusions [J].
Burgess, LJ .
CLINICA CHIMICA ACTA, 2004, 343 (1-2) :61-84
[8]   Effectiveness of computed tomography attenuation values in characterization of pericardial effusion [J].
Cetin, Mehmet Serkan ;
Cetin, Elif Hande Ozcan ;
Ozdemir, Mustafa ;
Topaloglu, Serkan ;
Aras, Dursun ;
Temizhan, Ahmet ;
Aydogdu, Sinan .
ANATOLIAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2017, 17 (04) :322-327
[9]   THORACENTESIS - CLINICAL-VALUE, COMPLICATIONS, TECHNICAL PROBLEMS, AND PATIENT EXPERIENCE [J].
COLLINS, TR ;
SAHN, SA .
CHEST, 1987, 91 (06) :817-822
[10]   Efficacy of CT in diagnosis of transudates and exudates in patients with pleural effusion [J].
Cullu, Nesat ;
Kalemci, Serdar ;
Karakas, Omer ;
Eser, Irfan ;
Yalcin, Funda ;
Boyaci, Fatima Nurefsan ;
Karakas, Ekrem .
DIAGNOSTIC AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2014, 20 (02) :116-120