Use of rpoB gene analysis for identification of nitrogen-fixing Paenibacillus species as an alternative to the 16S rRNA gene

被引:45
|
作者
da Mota, FF
Gomes, EA
Paiva, E
Rosado, AS
Seldin, L
机构
[1] Univ Fed Rio de Janeiro, Ctr Ciencias Saude, Inst Microbiol Prof Paulo de Goes, BR-21941590 Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
[2] EMBRAPA, CNPMS, Sete Lagoas, MG, Brazil
关键词
16S rRNA gene; DNA sequencing; nitrogen-fixing Paenibacillus; phylogeny; rpoB gene; taxonomy;
D O I
10.1111/j.1472-765X.2004.01536.x
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Aim: To avoid the limitations of 16S rRNA-based phylogenetic analysis for Paenibacillus species, the usefulness of the RNA polymerase beta-subunit encoding gene (rpoB) was investigated as an alternative to the 16S rRNA gene for taxonomic studies. Methods and Results: Partial rpoB sequences were generated for the type strains of eight nitrogen-fixing Paenibacillus species. The presence of only one copy of rpoB in the genome of P. graminis strain RSA19(T) was demonstrated by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis and hybridization assays. A comparative analysis of the sequences of the 16S rRNA and rpoB genes was performed and the eight species showed between 91.6-99.1% (16S rRNA) and 77.9-97.3% (rpoB) similarity, allowing a more accurate discrimination between the different species using the rpoB gene. Finally, 24 isolates from the rhizosphere of different cultivars of maize previously identified as Paenibacillus spp. were assigned correctly to one of the nitrogen-fixing species. Conclusions, Significance and Impact of the Study: The data obtained in this study indicate that rpoB is a powerful identification tool, which can be used for the correct discrimination of the nitrogen-fixing species of agricultural and industrial importance within the genus Paenibacillus.
引用
收藏
页码:34 / 40
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The inconstant gut microbiota of Drosophila species revealed by 16S rRNA gene analysis
    Adam C-N Wong
    John M Chaston
    Angela E Douglas
    The ISME Journal, 2013, 7 : 1922 - 1932
  • [42] The inconstant gut microbiota of Drosophila species revealed by 16S rRNA gene analysis
    Wong, Adam C-N
    Chaston, John M.
    Douglas, Angela E.
    ISME JOURNAL, 2013, 7 (10): : 1922 - 1932
  • [43] Identification of Corynebacterium bovis by endonuclease restriction analysis of the 16S rRNA gene sequence
    Huxley, JN
    Helps, CR
    Bradley, AJ
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2004, 87 (01) : 38 - 45
  • [44] Identification of luminous bacteria in Caspian seawater using 16S rRNA gene analysis
    Yazdi, Mona Malek Nejad
    Mashreghi, Mansour
    Vaezi, Jamil
    Kakhki, Ali Makhdoumi
    Bahreini, Masoumeh
    Oroojalian, Fatemeh
    Pordeli, Parvaneh
    CLINICAL BIOCHEMISTRY, 2011, 44 (13) : S100 - S100
  • [45] Polymorphic Analysis of Mitochondrial 16S rRNA Gene of Two Lizard Species in Vietnam
    Dung, T. Q.
    Thi, Q. D.
    Chung, N. D.
    Thien, T. V.
    RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF GENETICS, 2011, 47 (05) : 621 - 624
  • [46] Rapid bacterial identification using 16S rRNA gene sequencing
    Lee, K. O.
    Chung, S. J.
    Jung, N. Y.
    Lee, H. J.
    Kim, K. T.
    CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, 2007, 53 (06) : A57 - A57
  • [47] Transcriptional analysis of the 16S rRNA gene in Rickettsia prowazekii
    Pang, HL
    Winkler, HH
    JOURNAL OF BACTERIOLOGY, 1996, 178 (06) : 1750 - 1755
  • [48] New molecular target for the phylogenetic identification of Leptospira species directly from clinical samples: an alternative gene to 16S rRNA
    Julio, Rafael Guillermo Villarreal
    Agudelo-Florez, Piedad
    Lopez, Juan Alvaro
    Sanchez, Ronald Guillermo Pelaez
    REVISTA DA SOCIEDADE BRASILEIRA DE MEDICINA TROPICAL, 2020, 53
  • [49] Comparative evaluation of sequence analysis of 16S rRNA and rpoB genes for identification of aquatic mycobacteria
    Pourahmad, Fazel
    Richards, Randolph H.
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF VETERINARY & ANIMAL SCIENCES, 2016, 40 (04): : 406 - 416
  • [50] A renaissance for the pioneering 16S rRNA gene
    Tringe, Susannah G.
    Hugenholtz, Philip
    CURRENT OPINION IN MICROBIOLOGY, 2008, 11 (05) : 442 - 446