Does bacteriology laboratory automation reduce time to results and increase quality management?

被引：61

作者：

Dauwalder, O. ^{[1
,2
]}

Landrieve, L. ^{[3
]}

Laurent, F. ^{[2
,4
,5
]}

de Montclos, M. ^{[6
]}

Vandenesch, F. ^{[1
,2
,5
]}

Lina, G. ^{[2
,5
,6
]}

机构：

[1] Hosp Civils Lyon, Bacteriol Lab, Ctr Biol & Pathol Est, Bron, France

[2] Hosp Civils Lyon, Serv Tech Biomed, Lyon, France

[3] Hosp Civils Lyon, Bacteriol Lab, Ctr Biol & Pathol Nord, Lyon, France

[4] Hosp Civils Lyon, Bacteriol Lab, Ctr Biol & Pathol Sud, Pierre Benite, France

[5] Univ Lyon 1, Fac Med Lyon Est, F-69365 Lyon, France

[6] INSERM, U1111, CIRI Domaine Buire, Lyon, France

来源：

CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTION | 2016年 / 22卷 / 03期

关键词：

Automation; clinical microbiology laboratory; InoqulA plus (TM); ReadA (TM); time to results; traceability; WASPLab; SWAB TRANSPORT-SYSTEMS; CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY; INOQULA; PERFORMANCE; INSTRUMENT; RECOVERY; ESWAB; WASP;

D O I：

10.1016/j.cmi.2015.10.037

中图分类号：

R51 [传染病];

学科分类号：

100401 ;

摘要：

Due to reductions in financial and human resources, many microbiological laboratories have merged to build very large clinical microbiology laboratories, which allow the use of fully automated laboratory instruments. For clinical chemistry and haematology, automation has reduced the time to results and improved the management of laboratory quality. The aim of this review was to examine whether fully automated laboratory instruments for microbiology can reduce time to results and impact quality management. This study focused on solutions that are currently available, including the BD Kiestra (TM) Work Cell Automation and Total Lab Automation and the Copan WASPLab (R). Clinical Microbiology and Infection (C) 2015 European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

引用

页码：236 / 243

页数：8

共 24 条

[1] Automation in Clinical Microbiology [J].

Bourbeau, Paul P. ;

Ledeboer, Nathan A. .

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2013, 51 (06) :1658-1665

[2] First Evaluation of the WASP, a New Automated Microbiology Plating Instrument [J].

Bourbeau, Paul P. ;

Swartz, Brandi Lynn .

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2009, 47 (04) :1101-1106

[3] Clinical Evaluation of the Walk-Away Specimen Processor and ESwab for Recovery of Streptococcus agalactiae Isolates in Prenatal Screening Specimens [J].

Buchan, Blake W. ;

Olson, Wendy J. ;

Mackey, Tami-Lea A. ;

Ledeboer, Nathan A. .

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2014, 52 (06) :2166-2168

[4]

CISp A., 2013, WASPLAB OP MAN, P100

[5] Optimal testing parameters for blood cultures [J].

Cockerill, FR ;

Wilson, JW ;

Vetter, EA ;

Goodman, KM ;

Torgerson, CA ;

Harmsen, WS ;

Schleck, CD ;

Ilstrup, DM ;

Washington, JA ;

Wilson, WR .

CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2004, 38 (12) :1724-1730

[6] Clinical comparison of BACTEC 9240 plus aerobic/F resin bottles and the isolator aerobic culture system for detection of bloodstream infections [J].

Cockerill, FR ;

Reed, GS ;

Hughes, JG ;

Torgerson, CA ;

Vetter, EA ;

Harmsen, WS ;

Dale, JS ;

Roberts, GD ;

Ilstrup, DM ;

Henry, NK .

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1997, 35 (06) :1469-1472

[7]

COFRAC CFdA, 2013, 151892012 COFRAC CFD, P48

[8]

Copan, 2011, WASP CLEAN SAN PROC, P8

[9]

Cornaglia G, 2012, European Manual of Clinical Microbiology (2012) SFM

[10] Comparison of Inoculation with the InoqulA and WASP Automated Systems with Manual Inoculation [J].

Croxatto, Antony ;

Dijkstra, Klaas ;

Prod'hom, Guy ;

Greub, Gilbert .

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2015, 53 (07) :2298-2307

← 1 2 3 →