Medical immunity, international law and just war theory

被引:2
作者
Allhoff, Fritz [1 ]
Potts, K. [2 ]
机构
[1] Western Michigan Univ, Dept Philosophy, Kalamazoo, MI 49008 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Law Sch, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
military medical ethics; medical immunity; international humanitarian law; just war theory; NEUTRALITY;
D O I
10.1136/jramc-2018-001020
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Under customary international law, the First Geneva Convention and Additional Protocol I, medical personnel are protected against intentional attack. In 1 of this paper, we survey these legal norms and situate them within the broader international humanitarian law framework. In 2, we explore the historical and philosophical basis of medical immunity, both of which have been underexplored in the academic literature. In 3, we analyse these norms as applied to an attack in Afghanistan (2015) by the United States; the United States was attempting to target a Taliban command-and-control centre but inadvertently destroyed a Medecins Sans Frontieres hospital instead, killing 42 people. In 4, we consider forfeiture of medical immunity and, more sceptically, whether supreme emergency could justify infringement of non-forfeited protected status.
引用
收藏
页码:256 / 265
页数:10
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]  
Adams MP, 2008, INT LIBR ETH LAW NEW, V41, P215
[2]  
Allhoff F, 2011, CULTURAL HERITAGE ET, P43
[3]  
Allhoff F, 2011, PUBLIC AFFAIRS Q, V25, P217
[4]  
Allhoff F, 2013, SLATE, P13
[5]  
Allhoff F, 2012, MED SOCIAL JUSTICE E, P363
[6]  
Allhoff F., 2008, Physicians at war: The dual-loyalties challenge
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2011, Accountability for Collective Wrongdoing
[8]  
[Anonymous], ONE YEAR KUNDUZ BATT
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2006, JUST UNJUST WARS
[10]  
[Anonymous], COLLECTED PAPERS