Reynolds stress transport modeling for high-lift airfoil flows

被引:19
|
作者
Chaouat, Bruno [1 ]
机构
[1] Off Natl Etud & Rech Aerosp, Dept Computat Fluid Dynam, F-92322 Chatillon, France
关键词
D O I
10.2514/1.21228
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
Numerical predictions of high-lift airfoil flows are performed on refined grids using a Reynolds stress model that is a variant of Launder and Shima model [Launder, B. E., and Shima, N., "Second Moment Closure for the Near Wall Sublayer: Development and Application," AIAA Journal, Vol. 2710, 1989, pp. t319-1325.] and a standard k-is an element of model. In this study, the test case of the turbulent flow over the A-airfoil designed by Aerospatiale is considered. Three incidence angles 7.2, 13.3, and 15.3 deg, which correspond to attached and separated flows, are examined for analyzing the performances of the Reynolds stress turbulence model. In particular, emphasis is put on the case 13.3 deg near the static stall which constitutes a challenging test in turbulence modeling since the flow presents complex physics such as a laminar separation bubble, a turbulent reattachment, and a turbulent separation near the trailing edge. Comprehensive comparisons with wind tunnel experiments for the lift and drag coefficients, the pressure and skin friction distributions, as well as the computed velocity, and Reynolds stress turbulent profiles, are worked out. Special attention is devoted to the evolving profiles of the velocity and the turbulent stresses in the boundary layer at six locations on the suction side of the airfoil for incidence angles 7.2 and 13.3 deg. As a result of interest, it is found that the Reynolds stress model predicts both attached and separated flows in a very good agreement with the experimental data. As expected, the k-is an element of model reveals very poor performance near the static stall.
引用
收藏
页码:2390 / 2403
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Verification and validation of openfoam for high-lift aircraft flows
    Ashton, Neil
    Skaperdas, Vangelis
    Journal of Aircraft, 2019, 56 (04): : 1641 - 1657
  • [32] Verification and Validation of OpenFOAM for High-Lift Aircraft Flows
    Ashton, Neil
    Skaperdas, Vangelis
    JOURNAL OF AIRCRAFT, 2019, 56 (04): : 1641 - 1657
  • [33] Investigation of confluent boundary layers in high-lift flows
    Ying, SX
    Spaid, FW
    McGinley, CB
    Rumsey, CL
    JOURNAL OF AIRCRAFT, 1999, 36 (03): : 550 - 562
  • [34] High-Lift Airfoil Separation with Dielectric Barrier Discharge Plasma Actuation
    Little, Jesse
    Samimy, Mo
    AIAA JOURNAL, 2010, 48 (12) : 2884 - 2898
  • [35] Design of a High-Lift, Thick Airfoil for Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Applications
    Cerra, David F.
    Katz, Joseph
    JOURNAL OF AIRCRAFT, 2008, 45 (05): : 1789 - 1793
  • [36] Active Flow Control of a High-Lift Supercritical Airfoil with Microjet Actuators
    Aley, Kade Stephen
    Guha, Tufan Kumar
    Kumar, Rajan
    AIAA JOURNAL, 2020, 58 (05) : 2053 - 2069
  • [37] Mathematical model of the flow around airfoil with energy high-lift devices
    Gulyaev, VV
    Lifanov, IK
    Misko, VA
    RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF NUMERICAL ANALYSIS AND MATHEMATICAL MODELLING, 1996, 11 (02) : 155 - 165
  • [38] Aerodynamic Design and Optimization of a High-Lift Device for a Wind Turbine Airfoil
    Jaume, Ana Manso
    Wild, Jochen
    NEW RESULTS IN NUMERICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL FLUID MECHANICS X, 2016, 132 : 859 - 869
  • [39] Design of a high-lift, thick airfoil for unmanned aerial vehicle applications
    Cerra, David F.
    Katz, Joseph
    Journal of Aircraft, 1600, 45 (05): : 1789 - 1793
  • [40] A two-element high-lift airfoil in disturbed flow conditions
    Klein S.
    Scholz P.
    Radespiel R.
    CEAS Aeronautical Journal, 2017, 8 (1) : 79 - 91