Interpersonal communication outcomes of a media literacy alcohol prevention curriculum

被引:9
作者
Banerjee, Smita C. [1 ]
Greene, Kathryn [2 ]
Magsamen-Conrad, Kate [3 ]
Elek, Elvira [4 ]
Hecht, Michael L. [5 ]
机构
[1] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Psychiat & Behav Sci, New York, NY 10021 USA
[2] Rutgers State Univ, Dept Commun, New Brunswick, NJ 08901 USA
[3] Bowling Green State Univ, Dept Commun, Bowling Green, OH 43403 USA
[4] RTI Int, Drug Violence & Delinquency Prevent, Washington, DC USA
[5] Penn State Univ, Dept Commun Arts & Sci, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
关键词
Alcohol prevention; Evaluation; Interpersonal communication; Media literacy; INTERVENTIONS; RESISTANCE; ADOLESCENTS; TELEVISION; EDUCATION; EXPOSURE; DECISION; PROGRAM; MODEL; YOUTH;
D O I
10.1007/s13142-015-0329-9
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Media literacy intervention efficacy literature has focused on media-relevant (e. g., knowledge and realism) and behavior-relevant outcomes (e. g., attitudes and behaviors), without much attention paid to interpersonal communication outcomes. This project examined interpersonal communication after participation in two versions (analysis plus analysis and analysis plus planning) of the Youth Message Development (YMD) intervention, a brief media literacy curriculum targeted at preventing high school student alcohol use. Participants attended a 75-mins media literacy YMD workshop and completed a delayed posttest questionnaire 3 to 4 months later. Overall, 68 % participants replied affirmatively to interpersonal communication about the YMD intervention. Communication about the workshop moderated the effects of the type of workshop (analysis plus analysis or analysis plus planning) on self-efficacy to counter-argue (but not critical thinking). Interpersonal communication moderated the effects of the YMD intervention on self-efficacy to counter-argue, thereby signaling the importance of including interpersonal communication behaviors in intervention evaluation.
引用
收藏
页码:425 / 432
页数:8
相关论文
共 65 条
  • [52] Mitigating the harmful effects of violent television
    Rosenkoetter, LI
    Rosenkoetter, SE
    Ozretich, RA
    Acock, AC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 25 (01) : 25 - 47
  • [53] Scharrer E., 2006, Journal of Mass Media Ethics, V21, P69, DOI [10.1207/s15327728jmme2101_5, DOI 10.1207/S15327728JMME2101_5]
  • [54] Children, adolescents, and advertising
    Shifrin, Donald L.
    Broughton, Daniel Dean
    Buttross, Susan
    Ginsburg, Kenneth R.
    Gonzalez de Rivas, Rosario
    Milteer, Regina Melinda
    Mulligan, Deborah Ann
    Strasburger, Victor C.
    [J]. PEDIATRICS, 2006, 118 (06) : 2563 - 2569
  • [55] HELPING ELEMENTARY-SCHOOL-CHILDREN LEARN ABOUT TV
    SINGER, DG
    ZUCKERMAN, DM
    SINGER, JL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION, 1980, 30 (03) : 84 - 93
  • [56] Southwell B.G., 2008, Communication yearbook 31, P420
  • [57] Between messages and people - A multilevel model of memory for television content
    Southwell, BG
    [J]. COMMUNICATION RESEARCH, 2005, 32 (01) : 112 - 140
  • [58] Connecting interpersonal and mass communication: Science news exposure, perceived ability to understand science, and conversation
    Southwell, Brian G.
    Torres, Alicia
    [J]. COMMUNICATION MONOGRAPHS, 2006, 73 (03) : 334 - 350
  • [59] When (and Why) Interpersonal Talk Matters for Campaigns
    Southwell, Brian G.
    Yzer, Marco C.
    [J]. COMMUNICATION THEORY, 2009, 19 (01) : 1 - +
  • [60] TYNER K, 1992, NEW DIRECTIONS, P170