CRITERIA FOR SELECTING A CLOUD-BASED LEARNING MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FOR A HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTION

被引:2
作者
Spirin, Oleg M. [1 ,2 ]
Vakaliuk, Tetiana A. [3 ,4 ]
Ievdokymov, Viktor V. [5 ]
Sydorenko, Sergiy, I [6 ]
机构
[1] NAES Ukraine, Univ Educ Management, Res & Digitalizat State Higher Educ Inst, Kiev, Ukraine
[2] NAES Ukraine, Dept Open Educ & Sci Informat Syst, Inst Digitalisat Educ, Kiev, Ukraine
[3] Zhytomyr Polytech State Univ, Dept Software Engn, Zhytomyr, Ukraine
[4] NAES Ukraine, Inst Digitalisat Educ, Dept Open Educ & Sci Informat Syst, Dept Network Technol & Databases, Kiev, Ukraine
[5] Zhytomyr Polytech State Univ, Zhytomyr, Ukraine
[6] Natl Aviat Univ, English Philol & Translat Dept, Kiev, Ukraine
关键词
criteria; selection criteria; cloud-based LMS; learning management system; higher education institution;
D O I
10.33407/itlt.v89i3.4958
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The paper explores the essence of the criteria and indicators which can be used to select a cloud-oriented learning support system for a higher education institution. The following criteria with corresponding indicators are identified: design criterion (reliability, accessibility, multilinguality, security, adaptability, ease of use and administration, free use); technological criterion (user access rights differentiation, cloud storage of data, integration with other cloud-based services, ability to download different types of files); communication criterion (user registration, communication between registered users, creating groups, creating forums and chats); information-didactic criterion (structuredness, calendar, assessment of student achievement, file sharing, testing and surveys, group and individual modes of work; analytics for a particular course). The most downloaded LMS are shown based on the results published by LMS Market Share. The paper offers an analysis of a number of cloud-based learning management systems (Google Classroom, Moodle, Edmodo, Studyboard, Oracle, Learner Nation, iSpring, Canvas, Schoology, Blackboard, NeoLms) in terms of the above-mentioned criteria and indicators. The systems were selected based on the method of expert evaluation. The expert evaluation showed that the most convenient and high-quality cloud-based learning management system for building a cloud-oriented learning environment of a higher education institution which best meets all the criteria are NeoLMS, Canvas and Google Classroom. These LMS offer all the functionalities which are essential in the educational process. We see the development of methodological recommendations for higher education regarding the high-quality and successful implementation of such learning management systems in the educational process as prospects for further research.
引用
收藏
页码:105 / 120
页数:16
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
Al-khresheh M.H., 2021, WORLD J ENGLISH LANG, V12, P1
[2]  
Alia Abdallah Ahmed Hassan, 2022, International Journal of Information and Education Technology, P280, DOI 10.18178/ijiet.2022.12.4.1616
[3]  
[Anonymous], Philosophical Dictionary
[4]  
[Anonymous], LMS STAT TRENDS POST
[5]  
[Anonymous], About us
[6]  
Beshelev S. D, 1980, STAT-US
[7]  
Dychkavska I. M, 2004, INNOVATIVE PEDAGOGIC
[8]   A systematic review on trends in using Moodle for teaching and learning [J].
Gamage, Sithara H. P. W. ;
Ayres, Jennifer R. ;
Behrend, Monica B. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STEM EDUCATION, 2022, 9 (01)
[9]  
Halchevska O. A, 2015, INFORM TECHNOLOGIES, V23, P115
[10]  
Holovnia O.S, 2015, INFORM TECHNOLOGIES, V24, P119